ASSESSMENT OF CONGENITAL NEUTROPENIA IN CHILDREN: COMMON CLINICAL SCENERIES AND CLUES FOR MANAGEMENT

A disparate group of rare hematological diseases characterized by impaired maturation of neutrophil granulocytes defines congenital neutropenias. Neutropenic patients are prone to recurrent infections beginning in the first months of life. Of interest is “cyclic neutropenia”, an ultra-rare disorder revealed by sinusoidal variations of the neutrophil count and periodically-recurring infections every 21 days. Diagnosis of these disorders is frequently obscured by the multiple causes of recurrent fevers in children. Aim of this overview is to outline the physical assessment of children presenting with early-onset symptomatic neutropenia, identify the disease between the many medical conditions and even emergencies which should enter in differential diagnosis, hint at the potential management with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, define the risk of evolution to hematologic malignancy, and summarize inter-professional team strategies for improving care coordination and outcomes of such patients.

Palatal mucormycosis in neutropenic children: A Case Report with Review of Literature

Palatal involvement in mucormycosis is mostly secondary to rhino-orbito-cerebral disease, but rarely can be a primary disease of the oral mucosa. This report presents two rare cases of the isolated palatal mucormycosis in neutropenic children and highlights some of the peculiar features of the primary palatal disease and management-related issues in children. A 12-year-old child, who had completed the dexamethasone-based induction phase of chemotherapy for Near Early T cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and a 9-year-old boy with a Late Isolated Medullary relapse of B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, who was to receive salvage induction chemotherapy, developed palatal discoloration without any other major complaints. Both had neutropenia and were on antifungal prophylaxis. In vitro staining of the discolored mucosa suggested mucormycosis, which was confirmed by pathological examination of the debrided tissue. Computed tomography, done before debridement, showed no significant sinonasal disease enabling us to proceed with the transoral approach. With the help of adjuvant antifungal therapy, the infection could be contained in both cases. This report, along with the reviewed literature, shows that limited palatal mucormycosis can be effectively treated by early diagnosis and debridement and appropriate antifungal therapy. Also, the role of antifungal prophylaxis amongst neutropenic patients has been briefly discussed here.

Diagnosis and therapeutic decision-making for the neutropenic patient

Determining the cause of a low neutrophil count in a pediatric or adult patient is essential for the hematologist's clinical decision-making. Fundamental to this diagnostic process is establishing the presence or lack of a mature neutrophil storage pool, as absence places the patient at higher risk for infection and the need for supportive care measures. Many diagnostic tests, eg, a peripheral blood smear and bone marrow biopsy, remain important tools, but greater understanding of the diversity of neutropenic disorders has added new emphasis on evaluating for immune disorders and genetic testing. In this article, a structure is provided to assess patients based on the mechanism of neutropenia and to prioritize testing based on patient age and hypothesized pathophysiology. Common medical quandaries including fever management, need for growth factor support, risk of malignant transformation, and curative options in congenital neutropenia are reviewed to guide medical decision-making in neutropenic patients.

Impact of empirical antibiotic regimens on mortality in neutropenic patients with bloodstream infection presenting with septic shock

Objectives: We analyzed risk factors for mortality in febrile neutropenic patients with bloodstream infections (BSI) presenting with septic shock and assessed the impact of empirical antibiotic regimens. Methods: Multicenter retrospective study (2010-2019) of two prospective cohorts comparing BSI episodes in patients with or without septic shock. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for mortality in episodes with septic shock. Results: Of 1563 patients with BSI, 257 (16%) presented with septic shock. Those patients with septic shock had higher mortality than those without septic shock (55% vs 15%, p<0.001). Gram-negative bacilli caused 81% of episodes with septic shock; gram-positive cocci, 22%; and Candida species 5%. Inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment (IEAT) was administered in 17.5% of septic shock episodes. Empirical β-lactam combined with other active antibiotics was associated with the lowest mortality observed. When amikacin was the only active antibiotic, mortality was 90%. Addition of empirical specific gram-positive coverage had no impact on mortality. Mortality was higher when IEAT was administered (76% vs 51%, p=0.002). Age >70 years (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.7), IEAT for Candida spp. or gram-negative bacilli (OR 3.8, 1.3-11.1), acute kidney injury (OR 2.6, 1.4-4.9) and amikacin as the only active antibiotic (OR 15.2, 1.7-134.5) were independent risk factors for mortality, while combination of β-lactam and amikacin was protective (OR 0.32, 0.18-0.57). Conclusions: Septic shock in febrile neutropenic patients with BSI is associated with extremely high mortality, especially when IEAT is administered. Combination therapy including an active β-lactam and amikacin results in the best outcomes.

The Experience of the Cooperation in Science and Technology European Network for Innovative Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Neutropenias (COST EuNet-INNOCHRON) Action and the Sweden Experience in the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Era

Background-Aim: Infection from SARS-CoV-2 has emerged as new pathological entity within the global medical community. One of the earliest questions was in relation to the ability of the immunocompromised patients to clear the infection. In COST EuNet-INNOCHRON we were interested in the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with different types of chronic neutropenia (CNP). The aim of the current study is to understand the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection and to identify any possible characteristic patterns of the clinical course in patients with CNP. Patients and Methods: The COST EuNet-INNOCHRON Action in collaboration with the European Haematology Association - Scientific Working Group (EHA-SWG) on Granulocytes and Constitutional Marrow Failure Syndromes has conducted an online survey on SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with CNP. The EuNet-INNOCHRON participants from different countries got access to an on-line platform fulfilling the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and could register adult and paediatric CNP patients who had been infected by SARS-CoV-2 from March 2020 to June 2021. Data on demographic characteristics, type of CNP, patients' background and SARS-CoV-2 infection history (symptoms, laboratory features, radiological appearance, therapeutic approach and outcome) were collected. Results: Twenty-six patients with diagnosis of CNP, 7 males and 19 females were registered. Patient age distribution as follows: 16 patients &gt;18 years old (y.o.)5 patients 5-18 y.o, 4 patients &lt; 5 y.o whereas age was not available for one of the patients. Nine of the patients were diagnosed with idiopathic CNP, 7 patients with congenital neutropenia (6 of them with severe congenital neutropenia), 3 with secondary CNP, 2 with suspected autoimmune neutropenia of infancy (although antineutrophil Ab were negative), one with autoimmune neutropenia, one with drug induced neutropenia and 3 with other types of CNP. Twelve patients were on treatment with G-CSF and 6 patients had a history of previous viral or bacterial infections. Clonal Cytopenia(s) of Undetermined Significance (CCUS) was excluded in the eight patients who were investigated. Twenty-four out of 26 patients had positive PCR and one was found incidentally with positive antibodies for SARS-CoV-2. One more patient was symptomatic with history of close contact with SARS-CoV-2 infected family members. The commonest observed symptoms were fever &gt;38 oC (19 patients), cough (10 patients), rhinorrhoea (10 patients), sore throat (6 patients), musculoskeletal pains (7 patients), taste/smell loss (5 patients), headache (5 patients), dyspnoea (4 patients), chest pain (one patient) and none of them had gastrointestinal symptoms. No other associated respiratory viral or bacterial infections were reported. Four patients who had one or more underlying conditions (immune deficiency, heart/respiratory/kidney disease) were admitted in hospital and needed anti SARS-CoV-2 treatment. Two of them had non-invasive ventilation and one of them needed admission in intensive care unit (ICU); both recovered. Another patient with Fallot's tetralogy needed mechanical ventilation in ICU and sadly passed away. No other deaths were observed. Deterioration of the pre-existing neutropenia was seen in two patients, two patients developed thrombocytopenia, one patient developed worsening lymphopenia and one anaemia. Twelve patients had chest X-ray and consolidation was found in two of them. All three patients who had chest CT scans were found with ground-glass changes. During the observation period (up to two months), no re-infection from SARS-CoV-2 was found. The Stockholm, Sweden experience is similar to the above data. One hundred fifty-four patients with CNP were followed up, for 10 months (March 1 to December 31, 2020) for SARS-CoV-2. Seventeen of these (i.e. 11 %) were infected. None needed hospitalization and there were no fatalities. Conclusion: Although the relative susceptibility of neutropenic patients to contract SARS-CoV-2 needs to be assessed with further studies, the clinical course and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection doesn't seem to be worse in CNP patients (regardless the type of neutropenia and the need for GCSF treatment) compared to the general population. Also, like what has been observed in non-neutropenic patients, underlying comorbidities is a significant risk factor for severe disease and adverse outcome. Disclosures Dale: X4 Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Palmblad: Chiesi Ltd Sweden: Honoraria; Roche Sweden: Speakers Bureau; Chiesi Ltd Candada,: Honoraria.

Neutropenia and Large Granular Lymphocyte Leukemia: From Pathogenesis to Therapeutic Options

Large granular lymphocyte leukemia (LGLL) is a rare lymphoproliferative disorder characterized by the clonal expansion of cytotoxic T-LGL or NK cells. Chronic isolated neutropenia represents the clinical hallmark of the disease, being present in up to 80% of cases. New advances were made in the biological characterization of neutropenia in these patients, in particular STAT3 mutations and a discrete immunophenotype are now recognized as relevant features. Nevertheless, the etiology of LGLL-related neutropenia is not completely elucidated and several mechanisms, including humoral abnormalities, bone marrow infiltration/substitution and cell-mediated cytotoxicity might cooperate to its pathogenesis. As a consequence of the multifactorial nature of LGLL-related neutropenia, a targeted therapeutic approach for neutropenic patients has not been developed yet; moreover, specific guidelines based on prospective trials are still lacking, thus making the treatment of this disorder a complex and challenging task. Immunosuppressive therapy represents the current, although poorly effective, therapeutic strategy. The recent identification of a STAT3-mediated miR-146b down-regulation in neutropenic T-LGLL patients emphasized the pathogenetic role of STAT3 activation in neutropenia development. Accordingly, JAK/STAT3 axis inhibition and miR-146b restoration might represent tempting strategies and should be prospectively evaluated for the treatment of neutropenic LGLL patients.

The Evaluation of Neutropenia in X-linked Agammaglobulinemia Patients

Objectives: X-linked Agammaglobulinemia (XLA) is a primary immunodeficiency disease, characterized by severe hypogammaglobulinemia and the low numbers of peripheral B cells. Neutropenia is a rare complication among the XLA patients, which may lead to a higher rate of infections and morbidity. The aim of the authors is to assess the correctness of this issue. Methods: In this study, we compared demographic, clinical and laboratorial data between two groups of XLA patients, with and without neutropenia. Results: Frequency of neutropenia was 15% in our population. Infectious complications were the most prevalent clinical manifestations, regardless of the presence of neutropenia. However, Lymphoproliferative complication was significantly higher in the neutropenic patients (p = 0.001). No significant difference in mortality rate was observed between the groups. Conclusion: Neutropenia is a rare complication among the XLA patients, and significantly decreases the mean age of XLA diagnosis in the patients. But it is not related to the higher frequency of infectious diseases in the neutropenic patients compared to non-neutropenic ones.

Invasive Fusariosis in Patients with Hematologic Diseases

Fusarium species are filamentous fungi widely encountered in nature, and may cause invasive disease in patients with hematologic conditions. Patients at higher risk are those with acute leukemia receiving induction remission chemotherapy or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. In these hosts, invasive fusariosis presents typically with disseminated disease, fever, metastatic skin lesions, pneumonia, and positive blood cultures. The prognosis is poor and the outcome is largely dependent on the immune status of the host, with virtually a 100% death rate in persistently neutropenic patients, despite monotherapy or combination antifungal therapy. In this paper, we will review the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and management of invasive fusariosis affecting patients with hematologic diseases.