Safety and Efficacy of Caspofungin as Preventive and Empirical Antifungal Treatment of Neutropenic Allografted Patients.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 5024-5024
Author(s):  
Patrice Chevallier ◽  
Pierre Bordigoni ◽  
Thierry Lamy ◽  
Philippe Moreau ◽  
Jean-Luc Harousseau ◽  
...  

Abstract Antifungal therapy is appropriate in neutropenic patients who have unexplained persistent fever, despite receipt of few days of antibacterial therapy. Conventional or liposomal amphotericin B are the preferred agents in this situation for allografted patients but toxicity or interaction with other drugs could limit their prescription. Caspofungin, the first inhibitor of fungal cell wall glucan synthesis, is the only echinocandin approved by the FDA for treatment of candidiasis. In case of suspected or documented aspergillosis infection, caspofungin is generally reserved to patients who failed to respond to amphotericin B or voriconazole. Recently, Walsh et al (ICAAC 2003) demonstrated in a randomised trial that caspofungin was comparable to liposomal amphotericine B in overall success as empirical antifungal therapy of persistently febrile neutropenic patients and was better tolerated. Here, we report our experience of caspofungin as preventive and empirical anti-fungal treatment, between November 2002 and May 2003, in 19 allografted patients with neutropenia (< 500/mm3 neutrophils) ± persistent fever despite at least 4 days of appropriate antibacterial therapy (n=12). There were 15 adult and 4 children, 11 male and 8 female. Median age was 33 years (range: 3–57). There were 6 ALL, 5 AML, 1 Myelodysplasia, 1 CML, 1 Hodgkin disease, 1 NHL, 1 myeloma, 1 aplastic anemia, 1 carcinoma and 1 Ewing sarcoma. A myeloablative conditioning regimen was used in 14 patients consisting of total body irradiation (TBI) plus high-dose chemotherapy in 9 patients and busulfan plus cyclophosphamide in 5 patients. A non myeloablative conditioning regimen was used in 5 patients. For graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis, the regimen was cyclosporin plus methotrexate in 13 patients or ATG in 6 patients. Nine patients received a bone marrow graft, 9 received granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilized peripheral blood stem-cells and 1 received an unrelated cord blood transplant. Twelve/19 patients have received prophylaxis with fluconazole from day 0 of the graft. Patients received caspofungin at an initial dose of 70 mg then 50 mg per day. Caspofungin was initiated within a median of 10 days after allograft (range: 0–174) including 7 patients receiving preventive caspofungin treatment at the date of aplasia. The mean duration of caspofungin therapy was 16 days (range: 3–72). Caspofungin was well tolerated and not stopped because of toxicity: WHO grade 1 and 2 hepatotoxicity occurred in 5 patients including 3 with previous hepatic abnormalities, WHO grade 1 and 2 nephrotoxicity occurred in 6 patients. No infusion reaction was observed. Only one patient developed a probable invasive bronchopulmonary aspergillosis on day 30 while receiving caspofungin. Seventeen/19 (89%) patients remain alive at least 7 days after the end of caspofungin administration without documented or suspected fungal, bacterial, or viral infection. Resolution of fever occurred in 11/12 febrile neutropenic patients in a median of 2 days (range:2–13) after starting caspofungin. We conclude that caspofungin is safe and effective as preventive and empirical antifungal treatment of neutropenic allografted patients.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 4961-4961
Author(s):  
Elad Goldberg ◽  
Anat Gafter-Gvili ◽  
Mical Paul ◽  
Eyal Robenshtok ◽  
Liat Vidal ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Opportunistic invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are a major concern in the management of immunocompromised patients with hematological malignancies. The practice of administering antifungal therapy to neutropenic patients with persistent fever has become a standard care. Conflicting data exists concerning the efficacy of empirical antifungal therapy. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate if empirical antifungal therapy reduces mortality and prevents invasive fungal infections (IFI). Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing empirical antifungal treatment with placebo or no intervention (control), or another regimen, in neutropenic patients with persistent fever. The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, conference proceedings and references were searched until 2007. Outcomes assessed were: All-cause mortality, documented IFI, and adverse events. Relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated and pooled. Results: Our search yielded 26 trials, 6 of which compared polyenes or azoles to control, and 20 compared between different regimens of polyenes, azoles or glucan synthesis inhibitors. Compared to control, there was no difference in all-cause mortality (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.58–1.66, 5 trials, Fig.1). The risk for developing documented IFI was lower (RR 0.23; 95% CI 0.08–0.65, 4 trials, 4 events in the treatment group versus 18 in the control). When azoles (fluconazole, ketoconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole) were compared to polyenes (amphotericin B in 8 trials, liposomal ampho B in 1 trial) there was a trend in favor of azoles for decreased all-cause mortality (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.73–1.09, 9 trials) and for decreased documented IFI (RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.47–1.04, 8 trials). Adverse events of any kind were less frequent in the azole group (RR 0.40; 95% CI 0.34–0.66, 5 trials), as were those which required discontinuation (RR 0.48; 95% CI 0.38–0.62, 7 trials). Conclusions: Our review demonstrates that empirical antifungal therapy does not reduce mortality. Although it reduces IFIs, data are based on a small number of trials and events. The use of amphotericin B as empirical antifungal therapy seems unwarranted since it appears to be less effective than azoles, with no mortality benefit and an increased rate of side effects. Future trials should pursue a pre-emptive approach using improved diagnostic tools (such as galactomannan testing, high resolution CT), to identify the patients for whom antifungal treatment is warranted. Figure Figure


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4644-4644
Author(s):  
R. Rojas ◽  
Jr Molina ◽  
I. Jarque ◽  
C. Montes ◽  
J. Besalduch ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4644 INTRODUCTION Despite the advent of new antifungal agents, the prognosis of Invasive Fungal Infections (IFIs) in highly immunocompromised patients remains poor. The current Mycoses Study Group Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines do not recommend the use of combination antifungal therapy for the routine treatment of IFIs. However, the use of combination therapy has become very prevalent in treating seriously ill immunocompromised patients. The purpose of this study was to collect the clinical experience of 7 Spanish Haematology Departments in antifungal combination therapy. Thus, we retrospectively examined all antifungal combination therapies applied in patients diagnosed with proven or probable IFIs in our centers. The main goal was to determine efficacy, toxicity and mortality among combinations. PATIENTS AND METHODS We identified 52 patients (26 males and 26 females) who received antifungal combination therapy for more than a week in our institutions between October 2007 and May 2009. The mean age was 40.7 years (range: 2-73). The diagnosis of IFI was established according to the EORTC/MSG criteria. 31 patients were treated for haematological malignancies with high-dose chemotherapy for remission induction and the others 21 were undergone stem cell transplantation -9 HLA-identical sibling, 11 unrelated SCT, 1 autologous; the stem cells source was cord blood in 9 patients and 6 of the 21 receptors received reduced intensity conditioning regimen-. Underlying diseases were: 21 AML, 17 ALL, 7 MDS, 4 NHL, 1 MM, 1 CLL and 1 Biphenotypic Acute Leukemia. RESULTS 26 patients had a proven IFI -12 Invasive Lung Aspergillosis, 4 Candidemia (2 C. Krusei and 2 C. Tropicalis), 2 generalized Fusarium, 5 Mucormicosis (3 rinocerebral and 2 pulmonar), 1 generalized Scedosporium Apiospermun, 1 cerebral Cryptococcus and 1 generalized Geotrichum Capitatum- and 26 had a probable IFI (all Invasive Aspergillosis). All patients but 4 received antifungal prophylaxis, 9 with fluconazole, 18 with voriconazole, 15 with itraconazole, 2 with liposomal amphotericin B (AmB) and 2 with caspofungin. Antifungal combination therapy was: AmB + caspofungin in 17 patients; voriconazole + caspofungin in 15 patients; voriconazole + AmB in 15 patients; AmB + posaconazole in 4 patients and voriconazole + anidulafungin in 1 patient. Global mortality was 59.6% (31 patients) and mortality due to IFI was 32,6% (17 patients). The combination therapy was well tolerated and no patient had severe toxicity that leads to discontinue the antifungal treatment, although mild renal and liver toxicity were seen. 37 patients (71.1%) showed a favourable response (28 complete and 9 partial) while unfavourable response were seen in 15 patients (28.9%). When we analyzed the results among antifungal combinations, the response rate was: 82.4% in caspofungin + AmB group, 66.76% in voriconazole + caspofungin group and 60% in voriconazole + AmB group. In spite of the best response in caspofungin + AmB group there were no statistically significances compared with voriconazole + caspofungin (p=0,3, chi square test) and voriconazole + AmB ( p=0,16, chi-square test). In 83.6 % of patients response was accompanied with granulocytic recovery. CONCLUSIONS The prognosis of antifungal monotherapy for IFIs remains poor. In practice, clinicians are increasingly using antifungal combination therapy in highly immunocompromised patients although appropriate clinical trials evaluating this treatment have not been performed. Our findings show that combination therapy is well tolerated and good results are obtained with highly rates response in patients with this therapy. Future studies should be performed comparing antifungal combined therapy versus monotherapy and among different antifungal combinations. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3358-3358
Author(s):  
Avichai Shimoni ◽  
Avital Rand ◽  
Noga Shem-Tov ◽  
Izhar Hardan ◽  
Yulia Volchek ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3358 Poster Board III-246 Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (SCT) with both myeloablative (MAC) and reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) is effective therapy in AML and MDS. However, the relative merits of each may differ in different settings. We have previously reported on the role of dose intensity in a group of 112 patients (pts) with AML/MDS given allogeneic SCT with different busulfan (Bu)- based regimens (Leukemia 2006). We showed that survival was similar with MAC and RIC in pts given SCT in remission, but was inferior in pts given RIC in active disease due to high post transplant relapse rates. The combination of fludarabine and treosulfan (FT) has been reported as an effective regimen in AML/MDS with limited toxicity. However, the relative dose intensity and expected outcomes with FT in the different SCT settings, compared with Bu-based regimens is not well defined. We now extend the analysis to a group of 298 pts with AML/MDS, given allogneic SCT from sibling (n=153) or unrelated/mismatched donors (n=145) and included the more recently introduced FT regimen. Pts meeting standard eligibility criteria for myeloablative conditioning were given high dose iv Bu and cyclophosphamide (BuCy, n=81). Pts with a risk factor for MAC, mainly due to advanced age, were given fludarabine (F) and reduced doses of Bu (6.4 mg/kg, FB2, n=91), F with high dose Bu (12.8 mg/kg, FB4,n=63) or FT (treosulfan 30-36 gr/m2). Protocol allocation was not randomized, resulting in a younger age for pts in the BuCy group; median age 37 years compared with 60, 50, and 58 for FB2, FB4 and FT, respectively. BuCy and FT groups included more pts with active disease at SCT, while the BuCy group had less unrelated donors. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 17%,18%,18% and 20% with FB2,FB4,FT and BuCy, respectively (p=NS). However, pts were selected to regimens other than BuCy based on a high estimated risk for NRM. With a median follow-up of 38 months (range, 1-115), estimated 5-yr overall survival (OS) was 38% (95%CI, 31-44). OS rates were 36%,33%,43% and 41% after FB2, FB4, FT and BuCy, respectively (p=NS). Multivariate analysis (MVA) defined age>50 [HR 1.5 (1-2.2), p=0.05)], active disease at SCT [HR 2.3 (1.6-3.2), p<0.001)] and unrelated donor [HR 1.5 (1-2.0), p=0.02)], as risk factors for shorter OS. The conditioning regimen used was not predictive in the entire group. When the analysis was limited to pts in first or subsequent remission (n=126), OS was 51%,43%,58%, and 43%, respectively. MVA identified age>50 as an adverse factor, while SCT using FB2 or FT was associated with prolonged OS [HR 0.3 (0.2-0.7), p=0.002)]. When the analysis was limited to pts with active disease (n=172) either chemo-refractory to induction or subsequent therapy (n=93) or untreated [n=79; untreated relapsed AML (n=15) or MDS with excess of blasts (n=64)], OS was 12%,25%,32%, and 36%, respectively. MVA identified chemo-refractory disease as the major adverse factor; OS [HR 2.2 (1.5-3.3), p=0.001), while SCT using BuCy or FT was associated with prolonged OS [HR 0.7 (0.5-1.0), p=0.06)]. The advantage of FT was observed mainly in pts with active untreated disease (mostly MDS). OS was 57% (95%CI, 32-82) in a group of 25 pts given FT for advanced, previously untreated MDS. Only BuCy and to a lesser degree FB4 (OS 27%) were effective in the truly refractory pts. FB2 and FT, were associated with a grim outcome in this setting (OS 6%, p=0.04). In conclusion, dose intensity is associated with different outcomes in the different transplant setting. In pts in remission at SCT, outcome is mostly related to SCT toxicity, thus there is an advantage to less intensive regimens, such as FB2, while FT shares this characteristic. When outcome is dominated by the risk for relapse, such as in pts with active disease at SCT, there is an advantage to a more intensive regimen, such as BuCy. FT shares this characteristic mainly in pts with no true chemo-refractoriness, and has an advantage over FB2 in this setting. FT should be considered as a reduced toxicity myeloablative conditioning, that is feasible in pts ineligible for MAC, rather than a reduced-intensity regimen. In pts in CR toxicity is comparable to FB2 while in pts with active untreated MDS its anti leukemic activity is comparable to BuCy. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4554-4554
Author(s):  
Sebastian Sevilla ◽  
Gustavo Daniel Kusminsky ◽  
Mario Atilio Damiano ◽  
Miguel Rizzo ◽  
Jose Trucco

Abstract Abstract 4554 Introduction: Persistent fever in high risk neutropenic patients (HRNF) after day 5 of empiric treatment is a sign of high susceptibility for IFI with elevated morbidity and mortality. Diagnostic tools in this setting are inaccurate to determine the occurrence of IFI and most patients start with empiric antifungal agents. Drugs are usually associated with increasing costs and toxicity. It is challenging to establish the population of patients in whom in spite of persistent fever and neutropenia, avoidance of antifungal treatment is a reasonable strategy. Methods: We have prospectively allocated 229 HRNF patients in different empiric antimicrobial regimens over a 4.5 year period. In a retrospective revision, there were 33 patients with persistent fever on day 5 of empirical antimicrobial treatment and no evident new infection episode or clinical impairment. In 28 patients, a thorax CT scan was performed as part of the evaluation of persistent fever. The clinical outcome was evaluated regarding the presence or absence of pulmonary infiltrates in the CT scans. Initial empiric antifungal treatment, transfusions, days in hospital, days with neutropenia, antimicrobial treatment, and days with fever were evaluated. Results: Nineteen patients (68%) of 28 presented with pulmonary infiltrates. All of them received antifungal treatment. In 9 patients with normal CT scan antifungal treatment was deferred. The difference of the decision in not giving antifungals according CT scans was highly significant (p <0,0001). Transfusions of red blood cells and platelets were significantly less in the group of normal scans (p 0,0004 and 0,005 respectively). Antimicrobial treatment, days in hospital and days with fever were not significantly different in both groups. There was one death in the normal scan group due to relapse. Mortality was not significantly different in both groups. Conclusion: In HRNP, normal thorax CT scan changed the clinical decision in not starting antifungal treatment in spite of persistent fever. There was no difference in mortality with patients under antifungal treatment, allowing continuing with this strategy in more patients in the future. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2004 ◽  
Vol 351 (14) ◽  
pp. 1391-1402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Walsh ◽  
Hedy Teppler ◽  
Gerald R. Donowitz ◽  
Johan A. Maertens ◽  
Lindsey R. Baden ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jennifer van Griethuysen ◽  
Mark Gaze ◽  
Yenching Chang

Introduction: Patients with severe complications of non-malignant haematological disease are considered as candidates for curative treatment with an allogenic bone marrow transplant (ABMT). A non-myeloablative conditioning regimen is used; consisting of an alkylating agent and single fraction total body irradiation (SFTBI) at a dose of 2-4.5 Gy (dose rate 150mu/min). This is distinct from high dose fractionated total body irradiation (TBI) used in a myeloablative conditioning regimen; for which the late effects are well documented. There is however no dedicated study on the late effects associated with low dose SFTBI. Methods: We undertook a single institution study focusing on patient reported outcomes after SFTBI (January 2003 – January 2019) delivered more than 1-year previously, prior to an AMBT in patients aged under 16-years for non-malignant haematological conditions. A 19-point questionnaire was conducted with study subjects over the phone. The primary outcome was late effects as reported by patients. Secondary outcomes were patient demographics. Results: Fifty patients were screened, 31 were invited to take part and 24 consented to participate. Pulmonary toxicity was the most common visceral effect reported (5 patients), followed by kidney (3) and cardiac (2). No patients reported cataracts, diabetes or secondary malignancy. Two patients were on sex hormone replacement although no evidence of female menstrual delay was demonstrated. The majority (21) were enrolled in mainstream schools. Conclusion: Late effects do occur after SFTBI, but are mild and occur less frequently compared to high dose TBI. The consent process with children/parents prior to SFTBI should reflect this.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document