Acoustic Probing of Space-Time Scales in the Ocean

Author(s):  
R. P. Porter
2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 289-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Rajesh ◽  
Somdatta Sinha

1995 ◽  
Vol 345 (4) ◽  
pp. 397-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Durand ◽  
J. Colin ◽  
J.F. Lecolley ◽  
C. Meslin ◽  
M. Aboufirassi ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tejinder P. Singh

AbstractWe propose that space-time results from collapse of the wave function of macroscopic objects, in quantum dynamics. We first argue that there ought to exist a formulation of quantum theory which does not refer to classical time. We then propose such a formulation by invoking an operator Minkowski space-time on the Hilbert space. We suggest relativistic spontaneous localisation as the mechanism for recovering classical space-time from the underlying theory. Quantum interference in time could be one possible signature for operator time, and in fact may have been already observed in the laboratory, on attosecond time scales. A possible prediction of our work seems to be that interference in time will not be seen for ‘time slit’ separations significantly larger than 100 attosecond, if the ideas of operator time and relativistic spontaneous localisation are correct.


Exact continuum forms of balance (for mass, momentum, and energy) are established as relations between weighted space-time averages of molecular quantities computed at any supra-atomic length-time scales. The choice of weighting func­tion, and the physical interpretation of all terms, are discussed.


2013 ◽  
Vol 54 (S2) ◽  
pp. 197-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. V. Lokotosh ◽  
N. P. Malomuzh ◽  
K. N. Pankratov

2010 ◽  
Vol 128 (4) ◽  
pp. 2386-2386
Author(s):  
John A. Colosi ◽  
Brian Dushaw ◽  
Rex K. Andrew ◽  
Lora J. Van Effelen ◽  
Matthew A. Dzieciuch ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 116-119
Author(s):  
B. Guinot

I start by general remarks on the background of the recommendations on space-time references which are submitted to you.The need to consider time scales in a relativistic framework appeared more than 20 years age following the progress of atomic time standards. After long discussions, this led the IAU to define, In 1976, time scales which were designated, In 1979, as Terrestrial Dynamical Time (TDT) and Barycentric Dynamical Time (TDB). But soon afterwards difficulties in the interpretation of the definitions of TDT and TDB arose. It appeared that the source of these difficulties was the lack of a global approach to space-time reference systems. This point of view, first voiced by J. Lieske, gained acceptance. At the very beginning of the work of the WGRS Sub-Groups on Frames and Origins (SGFO) and on Time (SGT), It became clear the the primary mission of the SGFO and SGT was to jointly prepare general recommendations on space-time references on which they could base their specific recommendations.


2013 ◽  
Vol 116 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 549-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arindam Chakraborty ◽  
Ravi S. Nanjundiah
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document