An Estimate of Global Mean Sea-level Rise Inferred from Tide-gauge Measurements Using Glacial-isostatic Models Consistent with the Relative Sea-level Record

2007 ◽  
pp. 791-818
Author(s):  
J. M. Hagedoorn ◽  
D. Wolf ◽  
Z. Martinec
Keyword(s):  
Sea Level Rise ◽  
Sea Level ◽  
Tide Gauge ◽  
Relative Sea Level ◽  
Mean Sea Level ◽  
Tide Gauge Measurements ◽  
Global Mean Sea Level ◽  
Global Mean

scholarly journals A new assessment of global mean sea level from altimeters highlights a reduction of global trend from 2005 to 2008

2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ablain ◽  
A. Cazenave ◽  
G. Valladeau ◽  
S. Guinehut
Keyword(s):  
Sea Level Rise ◽  
Sea Level ◽  
Tide Gauge ◽  
Mean Sea Level ◽  
Error Budget ◽  
Isostatic Adjustment ◽  
Global Trend ◽  
Tide Gauge Measurements ◽  
Global Mean Sea Level ◽  
Global Mean

Abstract. A new error budget assessment of the global Mean Sea Level (MSL) determined by TOPEX/Poseidon and Jason-1 altimeter satellites between January 1993 and June 2008 is presented. We discuss all potential errors affecting the calculation of the global MSL rate. We also compare altimetry-based sea level with tide gauge measurements over the altimetric period. This allows us to provide a realistic error budget of the MSL rise measured by satellite altimetry. These new calculations highlight a reduction in the rate of sea level rise since 2005, by ~2 mm/yr. This represents a 60% reduction compared to the 3.3 mm/yr sea level rise (glacial isostatic adjustment correction applied) measured between 1993 and 2005. Since November 2005, MSL is accurately measured by a single satellite, Jason-1. However the error analysis performed here indicates that the recent reduction in MSL rate is real.

scholarly journals A new assessment of the error budget of global mean sea level rate estimated by satellite altimetry over 1993–2008

Ocean Science ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ablain ◽  
A. Cazenave ◽  
G. Valladeau ◽  
S. Guinehut
Keyword(s):  
Sea Level Rise ◽  
Sea Level ◽  
Satellite Altimetry ◽  
Tide Gauge ◽  
Mean Sea Level ◽  
Error Budget ◽  
Isostatic Adjustment ◽  
Tide Gauge Measurements ◽  
Global Mean Sea Level ◽  
Global Mean

Abstract. A new error budget assessment of the global Mean Sea Level (MSL) determined by TOPEX/Poseidon and Jason-1 altimeter satellites between January 1993 and June 2008 is presented using last altimeter standards. We discuss all potential errors affecting the calculation of the global MSL rate. We also compare altimetry-based sea level with tide gauge measurements over the altimetric period. Applying a statistical approach, this allows us to provide a realistic error budget of the MSL rise measured by satellite altimetry. These new calculations highlight a reduction in the rate of sea level rise since 2005, by ~2 mm/yr. This represents a 60% reduction compared to the 3.3 mm/yr sea level rise (glacial isostatic adjustment correction applied) measured between 1993 and 2005. Since November 2005, MSL is accurately measured by a single satellite, Jason-1. However the error analysis performed here indicates that the recent reduction in MSL rate is real.

scholarly journals Are long tide gauge records in the wrong place to measure global mean sea level rise?

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (19) ◽  
pp. 10,403-10,411 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. R. Thompson ◽  
B. D. Hamlington ◽  
F. W. Landerer ◽  
S. Adhikari
Keyword(s):  
Sea Level Rise ◽  
Sea Level ◽  
Tide Gauge ◽  
Tide Gauge Records ◽  
Mean Sea Level ◽  
Global Mean Sea Level ◽  
Wrong Place ◽  
Global Mean

The causes of sea-level rise since 1900

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Frederikse ◽  
Felix Landerer ◽  
Lambert Caron ◽  
Surendra Adhikari ◽  
David Parkes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Expansion ◽  
Mass Loss ◽  
Sea Level Rise ◽  
Sea Level ◽  
Tide Gauge ◽  
Greenland Ice Sheet ◽  
Mean Sea Level ◽  
Terrestrial Water ◽  
Global Mean Sea Level ◽  
Global Mean

<p>Global-mean sea level (GMSL) has been rising unsteadily by about 1.5 mm/yr since 1900, but the underlying causes of this trend and the multi-decadal variations are still poorly understood. Over the last few years, updated estimates of the underlying contributing processes have become available, notably for the contributions from glaciers, terrestrial water storage, the Greenland Ice Sheet, and thermal expansion. In parallel, 20th-century GMSL estimates have been revised downward as a result of improved reconstruction approaches, spatial bias correction schemes, and the inclusion of estimates of local vertical land motion at tide-gauge locations. Together, both developments now necessitate the re-evaluation of the GMSL budget to determine whether the observed sea-level rise since 1900 can be reconciled with the estimated sum of contributing processes. </p><p>Here we present a probabilistic framework to reconstruct and budget sea level with independent observations considering their inherent uncertainties. We find that the sum of thermal expansion, ice-mass loss and terrestrial water storage changes is consistent with the trends and multi-decadal variability in observed sea level on both global and basin scales, which we reconstruct from tide-gauge records. </p><p>Glacier-dominated cryospheric mass loss has caused twice as much sea-level rise as thermal expansion since 1900. Glacier and Greenland Ice Sheet mass loss well explains the high rates typically seen in global sea-level reconstructions during the 1930s, while a sharp increase in water impoundment by artificial reservoirs has been the dominant contributor to lower-than-average rates during the 1970s. The acceleration since the 1970s is caused by both thermal expansion and increased Greenland mass loss. No additional large-scale deep ocean warming or additional mass loss from Antarctica are needed to explain 20th-century changes in global-mean sea level. This assessment reconciles the magnitude of observed global-mean sea-level rise since 1900 with estimates of underlying processes.</p>

scholarly journals Review article: Sea-level rise in Venice: historic and future trends

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Zanchettin ◽  
Sara Bruni ◽  
Fabio Raicich ◽  
Piero Lionello ◽  
Fanny Adloff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Level Rise ◽  
Sea Level ◽  
Tide Gauge ◽  
Tide Gauge Data ◽  
Relative Sea Level ◽  
Mean Sea Level ◽  
The Past ◽  
Gauge Data ◽  
Relative Sea Level Rise ◽  
Global Mean

Abstract. The City of Venice and the surrounding lagoonal ecosystem are highly vulnerable to variations in relative sea level. In the past ~150 years, this was characterized by a secular linear trend of about 2.5 mm/year resulting from the combined contributions of vertical land movement and sea-level rise. This literature review reassesses and synthesizes the progress achieved in understanding, estimating and predicting the individual contributions to local relative sea level, with focus on the most recent publications. The current best estimate of historical sea-level rise in Venice, based on tide-gauge data after removal of subsidence effects, is 1.23 ± 0.13 mm/year (period from 1872 to 2019). Subsidence thus contributed to about half of the observed relative sea-level rise over the same period. A higher – yet more uncertain – rate of sea-level rise is observed during recent decades, estimated from tide-gauge data to be about 2.76 ± 1.75 mm/year in the period 1993–2019 for the climatic component alone. An unresolved issue is the contrast between the observational capacity of tide gauges and satellite altimetry, with the latter tool not covering the Venice Lagoon. Water mass exchanges through the Gibraltar Strait currently constitute a source of substantial uncertainty for estimating future deviations of the Mediterranean mean sea-level trend from the global-mean value. Subsidence and regional atmospheric and oceanic circulation mechanisms can deviate Venetian relative sea-level trends from the global mean values for several decades. Regional processes will likely continue to determine significant interannual and interdecadal variability of Venetian sea level with magnitude comparable to that observed in the past, as well as non-negligible differential trends. Our estimate of the likely range of mean sea-level rise in Venice by 2100 due to climate change is presently estimated between 11 and 110 centimetres. An improbable yet possible high-end scenario linked to strong ice-sheet melting yields about 170 centimetres of mean sea-level rise in Venice by 2100. Projections of natural and human induced vertical land motions are currently not available, but historical evidence demonstrates that they can produce a significant contribution to the relative sea-level rise in Venice, further increasing the hazard posed by climatically-induced sea-level changes.

Effect of the processing methodology on satellite altimetry-based global mean sea level rise over the Jason-1 operating period

2013 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 351-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Henry ◽  
Michael Ablain ◽  
Benoit Meyssignac ◽  
Anny Cazenave ◽  
Dallas Masters ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Level Rise ◽  
Sea Level ◽  
Satellite Altimetry ◽  
Operating Period ◽  
Mean Sea Level ◽  
Global Mean Sea Level ◽  
Global Mean

The contribution of the East Antarctic Ice Sheet to future sea level rise

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jim Jordan ◽  
Hilmar Gudmundsson ◽  
Adrian Jenkins ◽  
Chris Stokes ◽  
Stewart Jamieson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Level Rise ◽  
Sea Level ◽  
Ice Sheet ◽  
Ice Shelf ◽  
Antarctic Ice Sheet ◽  
Mean Sea Level ◽  
Potential Contributor ◽  
Global Mean Sea Level ◽  
Global Mean ◽  
East Antarctic Ice Sheet

<p>The East Antarctic Ice Sheet (EAIS) is the single largest potential contributor to future global mean sea level rise, containing a water mass equivalent of 53 m. Recent work has found the overall mass balance of the EAIS to be approximately in equilibrium, albeit with large uncertainties. However, changes in oceanic conditions have the potential to upset this balance. This could happen by both a general warming of the ocean and also by shifts in oceanic conditions allowing warmer water masses to intrude into ice shelf cavities.</p><p>We use the Úa numerical ice-flow model, combined with ocean-melt rates parameterized by the PICO box mode, to predict the future contribution to global-mean sea level of the EAIS. Results are shown for the next 100 years under a range of emission scenarios and oceanic conditions on a region by region basis, as well as for the whole of the EAIS. </p>

Estimating global mean sea-level rise and its uncertainties by 2100 and 2300 from expert assessment

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Horton ◽  
Nicole Khan ◽  
Niamh Cahill ◽  
Janice Lee ◽  
Tim Shaw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Level Rise ◽  
Sea Level ◽  
Exceedance Probability ◽  
Mean Sea Level ◽  
Mitigation And Adaptation ◽  
Climate Change Responses ◽  
Global Mean Sea Level ◽  
Original Survey ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Global Mean

<p>Sea-level rise projections and knowledge of their uncertainties are vital to make informed mitigation and adaptation decisions. To elicit expert judgments from members of the scientific community regarding future global mean sea-level (GMSL) rise and its uncertainties, we repeated a survey originally conducted five years ago. Under Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 2.6, 106 experts projected a likely (at least 66% probability) GMSL rise of 0.30–0.65 m by 2100, and 0.54–2.15 m by 2300, relative to 1986–2005. Under RCP 8.5, the same experts projected a likely GMSL rise of 0.63–1.32 m by 2100, and 1.67–5.61 m by 2300. Expert projections for 2100 are similar to those from the original survey, although the projection for 2300 has extended tails and is higher than the original survey. Experts give a likelihood of 42% (original survey) and 45% (current survey) that under the high emissions scenario GMSL rise will exceed the upper bound (0.98 m) of the likely (i.e. an exceedance probability of 17%) range estimated by the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Responses to open-ended questions suggest that the increases in upper-end estimates and uncertainties arose from recent influential studies about the impact of marine ice cliff instability on the meltwater contribution to GMSL rise from the Antarctic Ice Sheet.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document