Structural and Statistical Aspects of Stably Stratified Turbulence

Author(s):  
Jackson R. Herring ◽  
Yoshifumi Kimura
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tianyi Li ◽  
Minping Wan ◽  
Jianchun Wang ◽  
Shiyi Chen

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
N. E. Sujovolsky ◽  
G. B. Mindlin ◽  
P. D. Mininni

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Amir ◽  
N. Bar ◽  
A. Eidelman ◽  
T. Elperin ◽  
N. Kleeorin ◽  
...  

Atmosphere ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 157
Author(s):  
Duane Rosenberg ◽  
Annick Pouquet ◽  
Raffaele Marino

We study in this paper the correlation between the buoyancy flux, the efficiency of energy dissipation and the linear and nonlinear components of potential vorticity, PV, a point-wise invariant of the Boussinesq equations, contrasting the three identified regimes of rotating stratified turbulence, namely wave-dominated, wave–eddy interactions and eddy-dominated. After recalling some of the main novel features of these flows compared to homogeneous isotropic turbulence, we specifically analyze three direct numerical simulations in the absence of forcing and performed on grids of 10243 points, one in each of these physical regimes. We focus in particular on the link between the point-wise buoyancy flux and the amount of kinetic energy dissipation and of linear and nonlinear PV. For flows dominated by waves, we find that the highest joint probability is for minimal kinetic energy dissipation (compared to the buoyancy flux), low dissipation efficiency and low nonlinear PV, whereas for flows dominated by nonlinear eddies, the highest correlation between dissipation and buoyancy flux occurs for weak flux and high localized nonlinear PV. We also show that the nonlinear potential vorticity is strongly correlated with high dissipation efficiency in the turbulent regime, corresponding to intermittent events, as observed in the atmosphere and oceans.


2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Rogachevskii ◽  
N. Kleeorin

We derive equations for the mean entropy and the mean internal energy in low-Mach-number temperature stratified turbulence (i.e. for turbulent convection or stably stratified turbulence), and show that turbulent flux of entropy is given by$\boldsymbol{F}_{s}=\overline{{\it\rho}}\,\overline{\boldsymbol{u}s}$, where$\overline{{\it\rho}}$is the mean fluid density,$s$is fluctuation of entropy and overbars denote averaging over an ensemble of turbulent velocity fields,$\boldsymbol{u}$. We demonstrate that the turbulent flux of entropy is different from the turbulent convective flux,$\boldsymbol{F}_{c}=\overline{T}\,\overline{{\it\rho}}\,\overline{\boldsymbol{u}s}$, of the fluid internal energy, where$\overline{T}$is the mean fluid temperature. This turbulent convective flux is well-known in the astrophysical and geophysical literature, and it cannot be used as a turbulent flux in the equation for the mean entropy. This result is exact for low-Mach-number temperature stratified turbulence and is independent of the model used. We also derive equations for the velocity–entropy correlation,$\overline{\boldsymbol{u}s}$, in the limits of small and large Péclet numbers, using the quasi-linear approach and the spectral${\it\tau}$approximation, respectively. This study is important in view of different applications to astrophysical and geophysical temperature stratified turbulence.


2006 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. 419-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lukas Liechtenstein ◽  
Fabien S. Godeferd ◽  
Claude Cambon

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document