Towards Patients as Innovators: Open Innovation in Health Care

Author(s):  
Christoph W. Kuenne ◽  
Kathrin M. Moeslein ◽  
John Bessant
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Serdar Temiz

This paper explores HacktheCrisis, the Swedish hackathon that was a response to the COVID-19 pandemic to address the challenges that it brought up. The main aims of the research were to explore the feasibility of the digital only COVID-19 hackathon as an open innovation method and to uncover the major issues that emerged during the HacktheCrisis hackathon in Sweden. The process and outcomes were assessed, leading to the lessons and development of recommendations for future health hackathons as an innovation in health care. We have found that conducting the virtual hackathon for COVID-19 resulted in significant growth in the digital health community in Sweden. Governments should be as fast as the private actors and citizens to address these challenges and to undertake organizational adaptations. Not only the hackathons, but the projects and processes after the hackathons should also be planned. Matchmaking between individuals and private and public actors should be facilitated throughout the year. Technology companies should provide platforms that facilitate flow of process with nice structures and user-friendly tools. Organizations were not ready to utilize the outcomes of these hackathons. Compared to public organizations, private organizations were faster to join hackathons.


2020 ◽  
pp. 000812562096863
Author(s):  
Ward Ooms ◽  
Roel Piepenbrink

Open innovation is a viable strategy to solve wicked problems. However, the complexity of these types of problems renders the management of open innovation initiatives (even) more difficult. How can managers make open innovation for complex or even wicked problems work? This article examines case studies of open innovation initiatives adopting a health care service innovation. It uses the proximity framework to identify several ways in which open innovation barriers can be overcome despite their complexity. The case study findings show how partners leverage their differences to the benefit of service innovation in the face of wicked problems.


Health Policy ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 105 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 165-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelika C. Bullinger ◽  
Matthias Rass ◽  
Sabrina Adamczyk ◽  
Kathrin M. Moeslein ◽  
Stefan Sohn

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatrice Orlando ◽  
Luca Vincenzo Ballestra ◽  
Domitilla Magni ◽  
Francesco Ciampi

PurposeThe study aims to explore the interplay between open innovation and intellectual property. Differently from previous studies, we argue that open innovation fosters firm's patenting activity.Design/methodology/approachWe use linear regression analysis to test model's hypotheses. Data are drawn from the Eurostat statistics and refer to a large sample of European firms (NACE Rev.2).FindingsThe findings confirm that open innovation fosters patenting activity in health care, also thanks to huge governments' expenditures in this market.Research limitations/implicationsThe study focuses solely on European firms and it adopts a traditional linear approach. So, we cannot exclude that different dynamics may occur across European borders. Future research should address this concern by focusing on multi-country comparative studies.Practical implicationsOpen innovation is the most suitable model for health industry, because it improves both innovation performance and intellectual capital of firms.Originality/valueThe study tackles an existing gap of the literature by considering how the presence of large customers impacts the strength of intellectual property protection.


Author(s):  
Ronny Reinhardt ◽  
Angelika C. Bullinger ◽  
Sebastian Gurtner
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (08) ◽  
pp. 1740013 ◽  
Author(s):  
SEPPO LEMINEN ◽  
MIKA WESTERLUND ◽  
MERVI RAJAHONKA

This paper examines diverse service innovations created with service robots in living labs that are an under researched and growing area of scholarly research. In particular, there is a need for research that connects robotics with welfare and health care living labs. This study focusses on the nexus between the different types of robots and services in living labs. It contributes to the literatures of open innovation and living labs by developing a conceptual framework for analysing service innovations enabled by robotics in eight living lab cases. The framework distinguishes four archetypes of service innovations in health and welfare living labs: (i) socialising, (ii) aiding, (iii) entertaining, and (iv) personal assisting. The paper concludes with implications to theory and practice, and suggests directions for future research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document