Probability Spaces and Random Variables

Author(s):  
J. Stoyanov ◽  
I. Mirazchiiski ◽  
Z. Ignatov ◽  
M. Tanushev
1971 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 291-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald W. Zimmerman

A model of variability in measurement, which is sufficiently general for a variety of applications and which includes the main content of traditional theories of error of measurement and psychological tests, can be derived from the axioms of probability, without introducing “true values” and “errors.” Beginning with probability spaces (Ω, P1) and (φ, P2), the set Ω representing the outcomes of a measurement procedure and the set * representing individuals or experimental objects, it is possible to construct suitable product probability spaces and collections of random variables which can yield all results needed to describe random variability and reliability. This paper attempts to fill gaps in the mathematical derivations in many classical theories and at the same time to overcome limitations in the language of “true values” and “errors” by presenting explicitly the essential constructions required for a general probability model.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guoping Zeng

There are various definitions of mutual information. Essentially, these definitions can be divided into two classes: (1) definitions with random variables and (2) definitions with ensembles. However, there are some mathematical flaws in these definitions. For instance, Class 1 definitions either neglect the probability spaces or assume the two random variables have the same probability space. Class 2 definitions redefine marginal probabilities from the joint probabilities. In fact, the marginal probabilities are given from the ensembles and should not be redefined from the joint probabilities. Both Class 1 and Class 2 definitions assume a joint distribution exists. Yet, they all ignore an important fact that the joint or the joint probability measure is not unique. In this paper, we first present a new unified definition of mutual information to cover all the various definitions and to fix their mathematical flaws. Our idea is to define the joint distribution of two random variables by taking the marginal probabilities into consideration. Next, we establish some properties of the newly defined mutual information. We then propose a method to calculate mutual information in machine learning. Finally, we apply our newly defined mutual information to credit scoring.


2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-39
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Okazaki ◽  
Yasunari Shidama

Summary We have been working on the formalization of the probability and the randomness. In [15] and [16], we formalized some theorems concerning the real-valued random variables and the product of two probability spaces. In this article, we present the generalized formalization of [15] and [16]. First, we formalize the random variables of arbitrary set and prove the equivalence between random variable on Σ, Borel sets and a real-valued random variable on Σ. Next, we formalize the product of countably infinite probability spaces.


1989 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 169-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles M. Goldie

AbstractTheorems on random permutations are translated into distribution-free results about record times and greatest convex minorants, by defining them together on appropriate probability spaces. The Bernoulli random variables that appear in the standard representation of the number of sides of the greatest convex minorant of a random walk are identified.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Qunying Wu

In this paper, the complete convergence theorems of partial sums and weighted sums for extended negatively dependent random variables in sublinear expectation spaces have been studied and established. Our results extend the corresponding results of classical probability spaces to the case of sublinear expectation spaces.


2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 719-755 ◽  
Author(s):  
ZALÁN GYENIS ◽  
MIKLÓS RÉDEI

AbstractWe investigate the general properties of general Bayesian learning, where “general Bayesian learning” means inferring a state from another that is regarded as evidence, and where the inference is conditionalizing the evidence using the conditional expectation determined by a reference probability measure representing the background subjective degrees of belief of a Bayesian Agent performing the inference. States are linear functionals that encode probability measures by assigning expectation values to random variables via integrating them with respect to the probability measure. If a state can be learned from another this way, then it is said to be Bayes accessible from the evidence. It is shown that the Bayes accessibility relation is reflexive, antisymmetric, and nontransitive. If every state is Bayes accessible from some other defined on the same set of random variables, then the set of states is called weakly Bayes connected. It is shown that the set of states is not weakly Bayes connected if the probability space is standard. The set of states is called weakly Bayes connectable if, given any state, the probability space can be extended in such a way that the given state becomes Bayes accessible from some other state in the extended space. It is shown that probability spaces are weakly Bayes connectable. Since conditioning using the theory of conditional expectations includes both Bayes’ rule and Jeffrey conditionalization as special cases, the results presented generalize substantially some results obtained earlier for Jeffrey conditionalization.


2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (07) ◽  
pp. 2050022
Author(s):  
Werner Kirsch ◽  
Thomas Kriecherbauer

We consider ensembles of real symmetric band matrices with entries drawn from an infinite sequence of exchangeable random variables, as far as the symmetry of the matrices permits. In general, the entries of the upper triangular parts of these matrices are correlated and no smallness or sparseness of these correlations is assumed. It is shown that the eigenvalue distribution measures still converge to a semicircle but with random scaling. We also investigate the asymptotic behavior of the corresponding [Formula: see text]-operator norms. The key to our analysis is a generalization of a classic result by de Finetti that allows to represent the underlying probability spaces as averages of Wigner band ensembles with entries that are not necessarily centered. Some of our results appear to be new even for such Wigner band matrices.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document