The Environmental Impact of Sludge Dumping at Sea and Other Disposal Options in the U.K. - Trace Metal Inputs

Author(s):  
M. Hutton ◽  
C. Symon
Author(s):  
C. J. Bower ◽  
S. H. Goldthorpe ◽  
G. Fynes

The Global Warming R&D Programme at the Coal Research Establishment is evaluating options for removing CO2 from coal-fired power plant. The aim is to identify coal-based technologies with minimal emissions of CO2 as contingency planning in case the most pessimistic fears of warming are realised. Two promising options based on Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle have been identified, so far. One incorporates a conventional CO shift conversion step and a physical solvent scrubbing process to remove 90% of the CO2 and 99% of the H2S. The second approach is conceptual, using CO shift but also a membrane gas separator. The gas turbine would be fired with hydrogen in both cases. A discussion of the environmental impact of these schemes suggests that they would be very much cleaner than current technology using Pulverised Fuel combustion with Flue Gas Desulphurisation. CO2 disposal options and needs for future work are also discussed.


2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 155892501200700 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subramanian Senthilkannan Muthu ◽  
Yi Li ◽  
J.Y. Hu ◽  
P.Y. Mok ◽  
Xuemei Ding

This article describes the study of the eco-impact of plastic and paper bags using the life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) technique under three different options: usage and disposal criteria with the existing usage behavior to reuse and governmental policies to recycle (option1), usage and disposal criteria as per consumers’ perceptions if systems are in place (option2) and usage and disposal criteria in case of absence of recycling systems (option3). The first stage, which was the baseline for other options, comprised of the study of the eco-impact of plastic and paper bags in the manufacturing phase, without considering the usage and disposal phases. LCIA was performed by the Eco-indicator 99, a damage oriented method for LCIA in SIMAPRO 7.1. The single score values calculated by the Eco-indicator'99 were considered as a directive to compare the environmental impact made by plastic and paper bags and a detailed explanation of the results is provided in this article. The next stage was the study of the eco-impact of these bags including their usage and disposal phases. This was undertaken with the three different options as stated above and the results derived were compared with the results derived from the baseline study, which is the main focus of the study under discussion. The values for usage and end-of-life phases were obtained from the questionnaire survey of different user groups of shopping bags in China, Hong Kong and India. The results of this study show that the eco-impact of plastic and paper bags was very high if there were no usage and disposal options provided. When the eco-impact values from options of existing possibilities and consumers’ perception were compared, the eco-impact value was lower in option 1 in all the three countries for both types of bags, which is mainly attributed to the fact that in option 1, a higher percentage of reuse is preferred to recycle and disposal to landfill categories. Also the eco-impact of these two types of bags was studied with and without the presence of recycling systems in China, India and Hong Kong, where the eco-impact was lower due to the presence of recycling systems. The results indicate that a higher percentage of reuse could significantly trim down the eco-impact of plastic and paper bags. Consumers’ perceptions and usage behaviors in connection with respective government's policies and implementation of recycling systems could be highly decisive in reducing the eco-impact of plastic and paper shopping bags.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document