Fundamental Physics in Universal Space-Time

1994 ◽  
pp. 253-264
Author(s):  
Irving Segal
2016 ◽  
pp. 4058-4069
Author(s):  
Michael A Persinger

                                Translation of four dimensional axes anywhere within the spatial and temporal boundaries of the universe would require quantitative values from convergence between parameters that reflect these limits. The presence of entanglement and volumetric velocities indicates that the initiating energy for displacement and transposition of axes would be within the upper limit of the rest mass of a single photon which is the same order of magnitude as a macroscopic Hamiltonian of the modified Schrödinger wave function. The representative metaphor is that any local 4-D geometry, rather than displaying restricted movement through Minkowskian space, would instead expand to the total universal space-time volume before re-converging into another location where it would be subject to cause-effect. Within this transient context the contributions from the anisotropic features of entropy and the laws of thermodynamics would be minimal.  The central operation of a fundamental unit of 10-20 J, the hydrogen line frequency, and the Bohr orbital time for ground state electrons would be required for the relocalized manifestation. Similar quantified convergence occurs for the ~1012 parallel states within space per Planck’s time which solve for phase-shift increments where Casimir and magnetic forces intersect.  Experimental support for these interpretations and potential applications is considered. The multiple, convergent solutions of basic universal quantities suggest that translations of spatial axes into adjacent spatial states and the transposition of four dimensional configurations any where and any time within the universe may be accessed but would require alternative perspectives and technologies.


Daedalus ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 141 (3) ◽  
pp. 53-66
Author(s):  
Nima Arkani-Hamed

Fundamental physics began the twentieth century with the twin revolutions of relativity and quantum mechanics, and much of the second half of the century was devoted to the construction of a theoretical structure unifying these radical ideas. But this foundation has also led us to a number of paradoxes in our understanding of nature. Attempts to make sense of quantum mechanics and gravity at the smallest distance scales lead inexorably to the conclusion that space-time is an approximate notion that must emerge from more primitive building blocks. Furthermore, violent short-distance quantum fluctuations in the vacuum seem to make the existence of a macroscopic world wildly implausible, and yet we live comfortably in a huge universe. What, if anything, tames these fluctuations? Why is there a macroscopic universe? These are two of the central theoretical challenges of fundamental physics in the twenty-first century. In this essay, I describe the circle of ideas surrounding these questions, as well as some of the theoretical and experimental fronts on which they are being attacked.


2003 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 1097-1119 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. El Gamal ◽  
M.O. Damen

2006 ◽  
Vol 54 (7) ◽  
pp. 1243-1250 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Kose ◽  
R.D. Wesel

2004 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Ciattoni ◽  
Claudio Conti ◽  
Paolo Di Porto
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document