Dear Carnap, Dear Van. W. V. Quine and Rudolf Carnap. The Quine-Carnap Correspondence and Related Work. Ed., with an Introduction by Richard Creath. Berkeley-Los Angeles-London: University of California Press 1990, xv + 384 pp

Author(s):  
Thomas E. Uebel

Richard Jeffrey. Introduction. Studies in inductive logic and probability, Volume II, edited by Richard C. Jeffrey, University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London, 1980, pp. 1–6. - Rudolf Carnap. A basic system of inductive logic, Part II. Studies in inductive logic and probability, Volume II, edited by Richard C. Jeffrey, University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London, 1980, pp. 7–155. - Jaakko Hintikka and Ilkka Niiniluoto. An axiomatic foundation for the logic of inductive generalization. Studies in inductive logic and probability, Volume II, edited by Richard C. Jeffrey, University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London, 1980, pp. 157–181. (Reprinted with added postscript from Formal methods in the methodology of empirical sciences, Proceedings of the Conference for Formal Methods in the Methodology of Empirical Sciences, Warsaw, June 17–21, 1974, edited by Marian Przełęcki, Klemens Szaniawski, and Ryszard Wójcicki, Synthese library, vol. 103, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht and Boston, and Ossolineum Publishing Company, Wroclaw, 1976, pp. 57–81.) - Theo A. F. Kuipers. A survey of inductive systems. Studies in inductive logic and probability, Volume II, edited by Richard C. Jeffrey, University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London, 1980, pp. 183–192. - Jens Erik Fenstad. The structure of probabilities defined on first-order languages. Studies in inductive logic and probability, Volume II, edited by Richard C. Jeffrey, University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London, 1980, pp. 251–262. - David Lewis. A subjectivist's guide to objective chance. Studies in inductive logic and probability, Volume II, edited by Richard C. Jeffrey, University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London, 1980, pp. 263–293. - Douglas N. Hoover. A note on regularity. Studies in inductive logic and probability, Volume II, edited by Richard C. Jeffrey, University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London, 1980, pp. 295–297.

1984 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 1409-1410
Author(s):  
C. Howson

2014 ◽  
Vol 91 (4) ◽  
pp. 43-55
Author(s):  
Scott Pittman

The story of anti-communism in California schools is a tale well and often told. But few scholars have appreciated the important role played by private surveillance networks. This article examines how privately funded and run investigations shaped the state government’s pursuit of leftist educators. The previously-secret papers of Major General Ralph H. Van Deman, which were opened to researchers at the National Archives in Washington, D.C., only a few years ago, show that the general operated a private spy network out of San Diego and fed information to military, federal, and state government agencies. Moreover, he taught the state government’s chief anti-communist bureaucrat, Richard E. Combs, how to recruit informants and monitor and control subversives. The case of the suspicious death of one University of California, Los Angeles student – a student that the anti-communists claimed had been “scared to death” by the Reds – shows the extent of the collaboration between Combs and Van Deman. It further illustrates how they conspired to promote fear of communism, influence hiring and firing of University of California faculty, and punish those educators who did not support their project. Although it was rarely successful, Combs’ and Van Deman’s coordinated campaign reveals a story of public-private anticommunist collaboration in California that has been largely forgotten. Because Van Deman’s files are now finally open to researchers, Californians can gain a much more complete understanding of their state bureaucracy’s role in the Red Scare purges of California educators.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 53-59

The California missions, whose original church spaces and visual programs were produced by Iberian, Mexican, and Native artisans between 1769 and 1823, occupy an ambiguous chronological, geographical, and political space. They occupy lands that have pertained to conflicting territorialities: from Native nations, to New Spain, to Mexico, to the modern multicultural California. The physical and visual landscapes of the missions have been sites of complex and often incongruous religious experiences; historical trauma and romantic vision; Indigenous genocide, exploitation, resistance, and survivance; state building and global enterprise. This Dialogues section brings together critical voices, including especially the voices of California Indian scholars, to interrogate received models for thinking about the art historical legacies of the California missions. Together, the contributing authors move beyond and across borders and promote new decolonial strategies that strive to be responsive to the experience of California Indian communities and nations. This conversation emerges from cross-disciplinary relationships established at a two-day conference, “‘American’ Art and the Legacy of Conquest: Art at California’s Missions in the Global 18th–20th Centuries,” sponsored by the Terra Foundation for American Art and held at the University of California, Los Angeles, in November 2019.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document