A New Framework for Collecting Implicit User Feedback for Movie and Video Recommender System

Author(s):  
Himanshu Sahu ◽  
Neha Sharma ◽  
Utkarsh Gupta
2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 635-648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donghui Yang ◽  
Chao Huang ◽  
Mingyang Wang

Social recommender systems aim to support user preferences and help users make better decisions in social media. The social network and the social context are two vital elements in social recommender systems. In this contribution, we propose a new framework for a social recommender system based on both network structure analysis and social context mining. Exponential random graph models (ERGMs) are able to capture and simulate the complex structure of a micro-blog network. We derive the prediction formula from ERGMs for recommending micro-blog users. Then, a primary recommendation list is created by analysing the micro-blog network structure. In the next step, we calculate the sentiment similarities of micro-blog users based on a sentiment feature set which is extracted from users’ tweets. Sentiment similarities are used to filter the primary recommendation list and find users who have similar attitudes on the same topic. The goal of those two steps is to make the social recommender system much more precise and to satisfy users’ psychological preferences. At the end, we use this new framework deal with big real-world data. The recommendation results of diabetes accounts of Weibo show that our method outperforms other social recommender systems.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinying Chen ◽  
Thomas K. Houston ◽  
Jamie M. Faro ◽  
Catherine S. Nagawa ◽  
Elizabeth A. Orvek ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Motivational messaging is a frequently used digital intervention to promote positive health behavior changes, including smoking cessation. Typically, motivational messaging systems have not actively sought feedback on each message, preventing a closer examination of the user-system engagement. This study assessed the granular user-system engagement around a recommender system (a new system that actively sought user feedback on each message to improve message selection) for promoting smoking cessation and the impact of engagement on cessation outcome. Methods We prospectively followed a cohort of current smokers enrolled to use the recommender system for 6 months. The system sent participants motivational messages to support smoking cessation every 3 days and used machine learning to incorporate user feedback (i.e., user’s rating on the perceived influence of each message, collected on a 5-point Likert scale with 1 indicating strong disagreement and 5 indicating strong agreement on perceiving the influence on quitting smoking) to improve the selection of the following message. We assessed user-system engagement by various metrics, including user response rate (i.e., the percent of times a user rated the messages) and the perceived influence of messages. We compared retention rates across different levels of user-system engagement and assessed the association between engagement and the 7-day point prevalence abstinence (missing outcome = smoking) by using multiple logistic regression. Results We analyzed data from 731 participants (13% Black; 73% women). The user response rate was 0.24 (SD = 0.34) and user-perceived influence was 3.76 (SD = 0.84). The retention rate positively increased with the user response rate (trend test P < 0.001). Compared with non-response, six-month cessation increased with the levels of response rates: low response rate (odds ratio [OR] = 1.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07–3.23), moderate response rate (OR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.36–3.88), high response rate (OR = 2.69, 95% CI: 1.58–4.58). The association between perceived message influence and the outcome showed a similar pattern. Conclusions High user-system engagement was positively associated with both high retention rate and smoking cessation, suggesting that investigation of methods to increase engagement may be crucial to increase the impact of the recommender system for smoking cessation. Trial registration Registration Identifier: NCT03224520. Registration date: July 21, 2017.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas J. Hamilton ◽  
Michael T. Vale ◽  
Michelle L. Hughes ◽  
Paige M. Pasta ◽  
Katherine Judge

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey J. Smith ◽  
Daniel P. Kelaher ◽  
David T. Windell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document