scholarly journals Myofascial Pain Dysfunction Syndrome

Author(s):  
Mirza Farhatullah Baig ◽  
Yashoda Ashok

AbstractMyofascial Pain Dysfunction Syndrome or myofascial pain disorder is one among the triad of disturbances that is encompassed within the umbrella term, TMJ disorders. Due to a lack of consensus on definitive symptoms and mode of diagnosis, it continues to remain an elusive entity for clinicians working with head and neck disorders and dentists alike. Additionally, There is a general lack of simplification in literature to enhance understanding and this is further complicated by the use of multiple descriptive terminologies to refer to the disorder. It is the objective of this chapter to provide a comprehensive overview of the subject for the reader, to clarify the various nuances of diagnosis, treatment planning and management modalities in addition to throwing light on the evolving terminologies, causative mechanisms and recent trends in MPDS management. The author has also highlighted the importance of a multi modality management approach, psychological rehabilitation with long term patient follow up. The authors personal experience with the use of specialised splints has been elucidated with relevant clinical case scenarios.

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1709-1709
Author(s):  
Anne-Sophie Michallet ◽  
Florence Beckerich ◽  
Fadhela Bouafia-Sauvy ◽  
Daniel Espinouse ◽  
Gilles Salles ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Rituximab has demonstrated significant clinical efficacy in the treatment of NHL, particularly in combination with chemotherapy, and its use has dramatically changed the treatment and outcome of both indolent and aggressive B-cell NHL over the past decade. Furthermore, consistent toxicity data have been obtained with a safe and tolerable profile in a large majority of patients. Aim: The objective of this retrospective study is to evaluate the long-term efficacy of rituximab monotherapy (4 weekly infusion at induction followed by 4 infusion every 2 months as consolidation) used for patients with relapsed indolent NHL. Results: From May 1998 through January 2011, Among 919 patients with indolent NHL treated in our department, 488 (53%) relapsed and were treated with rituximab alone (first and later relapse). 126 (26%) responded and were still in response 2 years later. These 126 patients (68 (54%) males and 58 (46%) females with a median age of 61 y; range: 17-94) are the subject of our analysis. 24% were over 70 years old, 45% were in first relapsed and 25% in later relapsed. Only 16% of the population have more than one co-morbidities (cardiac and or renal respectively); 79% a normal PS (0-1) with only 4 patients having a PS >2; 80% no bulky disease but 72% a disseminated disease (73% stage III and IV). In this study, 60 (48%) patients had a follicular lymphoma with 50% at an intermediate risk group according to the FLIPI score ; 20 (16%) a marginal zone lymphoma, and 43 (34%) a small lymphocytic or lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma and 3 patients other characteristics of lymphoproliferative disorders. After rituximab monotherapy, 55% of the entire cohort was in complete response (CR) and 31% in CRu or partial response and 5% in stable disease. Among these 126 patients, 74% progressed later than 3 years (38% later than 5 years). With a median follow-up of 6.5 years, 4-year and 8-year PFS were 70% and 30%, respectively. 18% had transformation into Richter syndrome and 12 patients have died. Conclusion: Rituximab monotherapy is an effective therapy in selected relapsed indolent NHL and allows long-term response. This strategy could be used as “spare of chemotherapy” which is an important question today, especially in indolent not curable disease. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naif Alqarni ◽  
Hamdan Alhazmi ◽  
Ossamah Alsowayan ◽  
Tamer Eweda ◽  
KhalidFouda Neel

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud K. Al-Omiri ◽  
Maher Al-Masri ◽  
Mohannad M. Alhijawi ◽  
Edward Lynch

Objectives. This article presents a review on the concerned topics and some considerations related to the concept of splinting teeth and implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism.Study Selection. An electronic PubMed/MEDLINE and manual search of identified articles and reviews as well as clinical, laboratory, and finite element studies was performed in this project. Due to the shortage in within-subject, long term, randomized, controlled clinical trials regarding the subject a meta-analysis was not possible.Results. Although surrounded with some controversy, joining teeth and implants during the rehabilitation of partial edentulism provides the clinicians with more treatment options where proprioception and bone volume are maintained and distal cantilevers and free end saddles are eliminated. It makes the treatment less complex, of less cost, and more acceptable for the patient.Conclusions. Whenever suitable and justified, combining implant and tooth support might be recommended as an alternative during rehabilitation of partial edentulism. Based on the literature, clinical tips and suggestions were recommended to increase the success of this treatment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Fernando Sousa Filho ◽  
Marta Maria Barbosa Santos ◽  
Gabriel Henrique Freire dos Santos ◽  
Walderi Monteiro da Silva Júnior

Abstract Background Corticosteroid injection and dry needling have been used in the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions, but it is unclear which intervention is the most effective. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of corticosteroid injection and dry needling for musculoskeletal conditions at short-, medium-, and long-term follow-up. Methods Electronic databases were searched up to 31 October 2021. Two researchers independently screened titles, abstracts and full-text articles. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that investigated the effectiveness of dry needling compared to corticosteroid injection in patients over 18 years with a musculoskeletal condition were included in the review. The studies had to report pain and/or disability as outcome. Risk of bias was assessed by using the revised Cochrane Collaboration tool (RoB 2.0). Quality of evidence was evaluated by using the GRADE approach. Results Six studies were included (n = 384 participants). Four musculoskeletal conditions were investigated. There is very low-quality evidence that CSI is superior to DN for reducing heel pain (plantar fasciitis) and lateral elbow pain at short- and medium-term follow-up, but not for myofascial pain and greater trochanteric pain. There is very low-quality evidence that DN is more effective than CSI at long-term follow-up for reducing pain in people with plantar fasciitis and lateral epicondylitis. Very low-certainty evidence shows that there is no difference between DN and CSI for disability at short-term follow-up. One study showed that CSI is superior to DN at medium-term follow-up and another observed that DN is superior to CSI for reducing disability at long-term. Conclusions There are no differences between DN and CSI in pain or disability for myofascial pain and greater trochanteric pain syndrome. Very-low certainty evidence suggests that CSI is superior to DN at shorter follow-up periods, whereas DN seems to be more effective than CSI at longer follow-up durations for improving pain in plantar fasciitis and lateral epicondylitis. Large RCTs with higher methodological quality are needed in order to draw more incisive conclusions. PROSPERO registration number CRD42020148650.


2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 393-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Agranovich ◽  
Colleen E McGahan ◽  
Anagha Gurjal

To investigate the recent trends in definitive management of esophageal cancer, the records of 138 consecutive patients treated with radical intent in a single institution between 1995 and 2003 were reviewed and analyzed. The median follow-up period was 5.7 years (range 1.1 to 10.4 years). Seventy-seven patients were treated with radiation therapy (RT) only and 61 with combined regimens (CRT), in which RT was combined with either radical surgery or chemotherapy, or both. The overall survival of the entire cohort was 32% over two years and 20% over five years. The survivorship in the RT group was 17% over two years and 5% over five years. In the CRT group, 51% and 35% survived over two and five years, respectively. From all the potential prognostic factors examined by univariate and multivariate analyses, only male sex and use of CRT were strongly associated with better survivorship. There was no significant difference in the outcomes among the different regimens of CRT. Survivorship was not affected by the location or histology of the tumour, clinical stage, dose of RT or use of endoluminal brachytherapy in addition to external beam RT. There was a greater tendency to use RT only more often in older patients, but patient age did not affect survivorship. The proportion of patients treated with CRT did not change significantly over the last versus the first four years of the observed period. Combined regimens are undoubtedly superior to RT as a single modality. The long-term survivorship of patients in a subgroup of our patients treated with combined modality protocols compared favourably with the previously reported results in the literature and specifically in prospective randomized trials. However, the optimal combined modality regimen is yet to be defined.


2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Venkatesh Naikmasur ◽  
Puneet Bhargava ◽  
Kruthika Guttal ◽  
Krishna Burde

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document