Post-Surgical Corneal Wound Dehiscence

2022 ◽  
pp. 275-284
Author(s):  
Saumya Yadav ◽  
Noopur Gupta ◽  
Neiwete Lomi ◽  
Radhika Tandon
Keyword(s):  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Corneal Wound

Corneal Wound Dehiscence After Penetrating Keratoplasty

Cornea ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 526-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sujata Das ◽  
Mark Whiting ◽  
Hugh R Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Penetrating Keratoplasty ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Corneal Wound

LAPAROSCOPIC REPAIR OF PERFORATED DUODENAL ULCER PATCH VERSUS CONVENTIONAL SURGERY

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr. Anil Kumar Saxena ◽  
Dr. Devi Das Verma
Keyword(s):  
Duodenal Ulcer ◽  
Laparoscopic Repair ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Duodenal Perforation ◽  
Perforated Duodenal Ulcer ◽  
Conventional Surgery ◽  
Duodenal Ulcers ◽  
Duration Of Operation ◽  
Repair Group

Introduction: For many surgeries for duodenal ulcer Laparoscopic repair has become gold standard for many elective procedures such as ant reflux procedures, laparoscopic cholecystectomy and in colorectal surgery. Although in the emergency setting such as in the management of perforated duodenal ulcer Laparoscopic repair has been slow and limited. Since 1990, for the treatment of perforated peptic ulcer Laparoscopic repair has been used which has been widely accepted as an effective method. Duodenal ulcer is defined as a peptic ulcer which develops in the first part of the small intestine called duodenum and usually present as a perforation of acute abdomen. In perforated duodenal symptoms as severe and sudden onset abdominal pain that is worse in right upper quadrant and epigastrium and usually followed by nausea and vomiting. In this situation there is rapid generalization of pain and in examination shows peritonitis with lack of bowel sounds. Aim: The main objective of this study is to evaluate outcome of laparoscopic surgery in comparison with conventional surgery. Material and methods: All the patients with clinically diagnosed with perforated duodenal ulcers presenting within 24 hours of symptoms and undergoing surgery were included during the study period. Total 50 patients were included with age group 15-65 years. All the patients with perforated duodenal ulcers were included which go through either conventional open or laparoscopic without omental patch repair. Result: Total 50 patients were included in these studies which were divided into two group with 25 patients in each group as laparoscopic duodenal perforation repair group and conventional open repair group. Mean duration of operation (in minutes) was 105.4±10.4 in laparoscopic duodenal perforation repair group whereas mean duration of operation (in minutes) was 67.3±8.6 in conventional open repair group. Mean duration of number of doses of analgesics required in laparoscopic group and conventional open group as 9.5±1.7 and 17.2± 3.1 respectively. Out of 25 patients in each group of laparoscopic duodenal perforation repair group and the conventional open repair group the outcome were noted with their post operative complication as shown in table no 5 below.   In Post-operative complications 21(84%) patients in laparoscopic duodenal perforation repair group and 14(56%) patients in conventional open repair group had no complications. 4 (16%) patients in the laparoscopic duodenal perforation repair group and 2(8%) patients in conventional open repair group showed Post-operative complications as chest infection. In the conventional open repair group  patients present with wound dehiscence and wound infection and Wound dehiscence and chest infection were 4(16%) and 5(20%) respectively whereas nil in Laparoscopic duodenal perforation repair group. Conclusion: Duodenal ulcer perforation is a life-threatening emergency which required urgent management for the patients. Due to the advance in duodenal ulcer perforation closure by laparoscopy it becomes popular and favorite choice. With certain criteria, laparoscopic closure of perforated duodenal ulcer is safe and effective though it was associated with longer operating time and had no impact on the outcome. Hence laparoscopic closure was better in comparison to open repair for the earlier returns to normal daily activities. Keywords:  Duodenal ulcer, Laparoscopic repair, Post-operative analgesia, conventional surgery

Clinical outcome of V-Y flap with latissimus dorsi and gluteal advancement for treatment of large thoracolumbar myelomeningocele defects: a comparative study

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-84
Author(s):  
Mohammad Sadegh Masoudi ◽  
Mohammad Ali Hoghoughi ◽  
Fariborz Ghaffarpasand ◽  
Shekoofeh Yaghmaei ◽  
Maryam Azadegan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Latissimus Dorsi ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Gluteal Muscle ◽  
Operative Duration ◽  
Csf Leakage

OBJECTIVESurgical repair and closure of myelomeningocele (MMC) defects are important and vital, as the mortality rate is as high as 65%–70% in untreated patients. Closure of large MMC defects is challenging for pediatric neurosurgeons and plastic surgeons. The aim of the current study is to report the operative characteristics and outcome of a series of Iranian patients with large MMC defects utilizing the V-Y flap and with latissimus dorsi or gluteal muscle advancement.METHODSThis comparative study was conducted during a 4-year period from September 2013 to October 2017 in the pediatric neurosurgery department of Shiraz Namazi Hospital, Southern Iran. The authors included 24 patients with large MMC defects who underwent surgery utilizing the bilateral V-Y flap and latissimus dorsi and gluteal muscle advancement. They also retrospectively included 19 patients with similar age, sex, and defect size who underwent surgery using the primary or delayed closure techniques at their center. At least 2 years of follow-up was conducted. The frequency of leakage, necrosis, dehiscence, systemic infection (sepsis, pneumonia), need for ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion, and mortality was compared between the 2 groups.RESULTSThe bilateral V-Y flap with muscle advancement was associated with a significantly longer operative duration (p < 0.001) than the primary closure group. Those undergoing bilateral V-Y flaps with muscle advancement had significantly lower rates of surgical site infection (p = 0.038), wound dehiscence (p = 0.013), and postoperative CSF leakage (p = 0.030) than those undergoing primary repair. The bilateral V-Y flap with muscle advancement was also associated with a lower mortality rate (p = 0.038; OR 5.09 [95% CI 1.12–23.1]) than primary closure. In patients undergoing bilateral V-Y flap and muscle advancement, a longer operative duration was significantly associated with mortality (p = 0.008). In addition, surgical site infection (p = 0.032), wound dehiscence (p = 0.011), and postoperative leakage (p = 0.011) were predictors of mortality. Neonatal sepsis (p = 0.002) and postoperative NEC (p = 0.011) were among other predictors of mortality in this group.CONCLUSIONSThe bilateral V-Y flap with latissimus dorsi or gluteal advancement is a safe and effective surgical approach for covering large MMC defects and is associated with lower rates of surgical site infection, dehiscence, CSF leakage, and mortality. Further studies are required to elucidate the long-term outcomes.

scholarly journals Abdominal Flap Necrosis and Wound Dehiscence following a Medical Tourist Tummy Tuck

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Vladislav Pavlovich Zhitny ◽  
Noama Iftekhar ◽  
Peter Caravella ◽  
Jake Patrick Young ◽  
Barry Zide ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Skin Necrosis ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
The United States ◽  
Abdominal Wound ◽  
Flap Necrosis ◽  
Aesthetic Result ◽  
Self Image ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Medical Tourist ◽  
Incision Drainage

Abdominoplasty is a major surgical procedure met with high rates of patient satisfaction and improved self-image. While many patients are lured abroad due to discounted prices for such highly requested procedures, unfortunately, there are also associated complications. A 47-year-old woman presented due to abdominal scar dehiscence due to skin necrosis secondary to a discounted abdominoplasty in Mexico. The patient had been turned away by several local surgical centers for treatment of the necrosis. The patient underwent incision, drainage, and two debridements before her abdominal wound was eventually closed. Patient recovered well postoperatively with improved aesthetic result. With the rise of social media advertisements, more patients elect to receive plastic surgery abroad. Unfortunately, many of these practices are not accurately vetted and this can complicate the postoperative care especially upon return to the United States.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document