Progressive joint damage during penicillamine therapy for rheumatoid arthritis

1988 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 135-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. L. Scott ◽  
A. Greenwood ◽  
R. Bryans ◽  
E. C. Huskisson

1986 ◽  
Vol 45 (11) ◽  
pp. 945-949 ◽  
Author(s):  
P T Dawes ◽  
P D Fowler ◽  
R Jackson ◽  
M Collins ◽  
M F Shadforth ◽  
...  


BMJ Open ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. e005246-e005246 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Hafstrom ◽  
I.-L. Engvall ◽  
J. Ronnelid ◽  
A. Boonen ◽  
D. van der Heijde ◽  
...  




Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (44) ◽  
pp. e22892
Author(s):  
Haruki Matsumoto ◽  
Yuya Fujita ◽  
Tomoyuki Asano ◽  
Naoki Matsuoka ◽  
Jumpei Temmoku ◽  
...  


2010 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. R96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melek Güler-Yüksel ◽  
Naomi B Klarenbeek ◽  
Yvonne PM Goekoop-Ruiterman ◽  
Jeska K de Vries-Bouwstra ◽  
Sjoerd M van der Kooij ◽  
...  


1988 ◽  
Vol 26 (18) ◽  
pp. 69.2-72

Rest, physiotherapy, simple analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) may relieve pain, ease stiffness and reduce inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) but they do not arrest progressive joint damage nor are they effective against the systemic manifestations of RA (e.g. vasculitis, lung disease, amyloidosis).



2011 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 351-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul P Tak ◽  
William Rigby ◽  
Andrea Rubbert-Roth ◽  
Charles Peterfy ◽  
Ronald F van Vollenhoven ◽  
...  

BackgroundIn the IMAGEstudy, rituximab plus methotrexate (MTX) inhibited joint damage and improved clinical outcomes at 1 year in MTX-naïve patients with early active rheumatoid arthritis.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to assess joint damage progression and clinical outcomes over 2 years.MethodsPatients (n=755) were randomised to receive rituximab 2×500 mg+MTX, 2×1000 mg+MTX or placebo+MTX. The placebo-controlled period continued to week 104. Two-year end points were defined as secondary or exploratory and included change in total Genant-modified Sharp score (mTSS), total erosion score and joint space narrowing score from baseline to week 104. Clinical efficacy and physical function end points were also assessed.ResultsAt 2 years, rituximab 2×1000 mg+MTX maintained inhibition of progressive joint damage versus MTX alone (mTSS change 0.41 vs 1.95; p<0.0001 (79% inhibition)), and a higher proportion of patients receiving rituximab 2×1000 mg+MTX had no radiographic progression over 2 years compared with those receiving MTX alone (57% vs 37%; p<0.0001). Contrary to 1-year results, exploratory analysis of rituximab 2×500 mg+MTX at 2 years showed that progressive joint damage was slowed by ∼61% versus placebo+MTX (mTSS, exploratory p=0.0041). Improvements in clinical signs and symptoms and physical function seen after 1 year in rituximab-treated patients versus those receiving placebo were maintained at year 2. Safety profiles were similar between groups.ConclusionsTreatment with rituximab 2×1000 mg+MTX was associated with sustained improvements in radiographic, clinical and functional outcomes over 2 years.Clinical trials.gov identifier NCT00299104.



2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 377-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahar Mahfouz Abdel Galil ◽  
Abeer Mohamed El-Shafey ◽  
Hoda A. Hagrass ◽  
Faten Fawzy ◽  
Ahmed El Sammak


1985 ◽  
Vol 23 (26) ◽  
pp. 101-104

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic inflammatory disease whose major feature is a destructive peripheral polyarthritis. In this condition simple analgesics may relieve pain while non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can reduce swelling and stiffness; neither however change the activity or rate of progression of the disease.1 If these drugs fail to control symptoms, if there is radiological evidence of rapid or progressive joint damage, or if the patient has serious extra-articular manifestations of RA (e.g. lung disease, vasculitis, amyloidosis), it is usual to start a drug that might modify the disease or induce remission. This article discusses disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) and how to choose between them.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document