scholarly journals Mapping of a major QTL associated with protein content on chromosome 2B in hard red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

2016 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 471-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yohei Terasawa ◽  
Miwako Ito ◽  
Tadashi Tabiki ◽  
Koichi Nagasawa ◽  
Koichi Hatta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Protein Content ◽  
Hard Red Winter Wheat ◽  
Red Winter Wheat ◽  
Major Qtl

END-USE QUALITY OF MONTANA-GROWN HARD RED SPRING COMPARED TO HARD RED WINTER WHEATS

1990 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 629-637 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHARLES F. McGUIRE ◽  
LARRY G. BLACKWOOD
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Protein Content ◽  
The United States ◽  
Grain Protein Content ◽  
Grain Protein ◽  
Peak Time ◽  
Loaf Volume ◽  
Hard Red Winter Wheat ◽  
End Use ◽  
Red Winter Wheat

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) grading standards for wheat places hard red spring and hard red winter (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell) wheat into separate classes. One important criterion for this designation is kernel type. Because of genotypes being released by plant breeders in recent years, distinction between these two classes is difficult for grain graders. As a consequence some people in the grain industry favor placing both of these wheat types into one class. One hazard of this action is that end use properties of these two wheats, according to some industrial firms, is class dependent. We studied quality characteristics of five hard red spring and seven hard red winter wheat cultivars grown at the same three Montana locations in 5 different years to evaluate this concept. Analysis of variance indicated quality differences between classes for all traits except flour yields, which were similar for the two classes. Flour ash content, farinograph absorption, peak time, stability time, valorimeter, grain protein content, bake absorption, mix time, and loaf volume were all significantly higher for spring than winter wheats. These values were still higher for spring than winter wheats except for test weight when wheat protein content was the co-variate. Both statistical treatments show that hard red spring wheat flour has higher water absorption percent, longer dough mixing requirements, longer dough stability times, and higher loaf volumes than hard red winter wheat flour.Key words: Bread wheat quality, loaf volume, grain protein content, protein quality

CDC Buteo hard red winter wheat

2010 ◽  
Vol 90 (5) ◽  
pp. 707-710 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. B. Fowler
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Leaf Rust Resistance ◽  
Triticum Aestivum L ◽  
Quality Standard ◽  
Yield Potential ◽  
Canadian Prairies ◽  
Hard Red Winter Wheat ◽  
Cultivar Description ◽  
Red Winter Wheat

CDC Buteo is a hard red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivar that is eligible for grades of the Canada Western Red Winter Wheat class. It is an intermediate height cultivar with moderate stem and leaf rust resistance and good winter hardiness and grain yield potential. It is adapted to the western Canadian prairies where its agronomic and disease package combined with an excellent grain quality profile has resulted in wide commercial acceptance in Saskatchewan. CDC Buteo was made the wheat quality standard for the Central Winter Wheat Co-operative Registration Trials in 2008.Key words: Triticum aestivum L., cultivar description, wheat (winter)

Fundulea hard red winter wheat

1993 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 199-201
Author(s):  
H. G. Nass ◽  
H. W. Johnston ◽  
P. Franck ◽  
A. H. Teich ◽  
D. R. Sampson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Powdery Mildew ◽  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Triticum Aestivum L ◽  
Bread Making ◽  
Key Words Wheat ◽  
Glume Blotch ◽  
Hard Red Winter Wheat ◽  
Cultivar Description ◽  
Red Winter Wheat

Fundulea is a winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell.) with bread-making quality and high grain yield. It is moderately susceptible to powdery mildew and septoria leaf and glume blotch and is suited for production in areas of Atlantic Canada where winter survival is not a problem. Key words: Wheat (winter), cultivar description

scholarly journals AC Grandview winter wheat

2002 ◽  
Vol 82 (2) ◽  
pp. 421-423
Author(s):  
H. G. Nass ◽  
G. A. Atlin ◽  
C. A. Caldwell ◽  
D. F. Walker
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Wheat Yield ◽  
Triticum Aestivum L ◽  
High Yield ◽  
Glume Blotch ◽  
Hard Red Winter Wheat ◽  
Winter Wheat Yield ◽  
Cultivar Description ◽  
Red Winter Wheat

AC Grandview, a hard red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), is adapted to the Maritimes. It has shown high yield, good winter survival and moderate to good resistance to powdery mildew, septoria leaf and glume blotch and snow mold. Key words: Triticum aestivum, red winter wheat, yield, cultivar description

WINTER WHEAT SEEDLING PREFERENCE BY GRAZING RODENTS

1977 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 1009-1011
Author(s):  
U. J. PITTMAN
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Field Experiment ◽  
Wheat Seedling ◽  
Triticum Aestivum L ◽  
Experimental Line ◽  
Hard Red Winter Wheat ◽  
Red Winter Wheat

Preferential grazing by rodents on an experimental line of hard red winter wheat, WT80 (Triticum aestivum L.) was observed in a variety × fertilizer field experiment that also included the cvs. Winalta, Sundance, and Kharkov 22MC. Plots that received NP fertilizers were more intensively grazed than others. The rodents were tentatively identified as white-tailed jackrabbits (Lepus townsendi campanius Hollister).

Quinclorac for Cheat (Bromus secalinus) Control in Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum)

1995 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lora M. Franetovich ◽  
Thomas F. Peeper
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Laboratory Experiment ◽  
Leaf Area ◽  
Field Experiments ◽  
Synergistic Effects ◽  
Wheat Yield ◽  
Bromus Secalinus ◽  
Hard Red Winter Wheat ◽  
Red Winter Wheat

Thirteen field experiments were conducted to evaluate quinclorac for cheat control in hard red winter wheat. Cheat control with quinclorac was variable. Quinclorac at 560 and 1120 g a.i./ha applied to tillered wheat controlled cheat 93 to 100% at four sites. In contrast, pooled over four other experiments and four application times, quinclorac at 420 g/ha and 560 g/ha controlled cheat only 20 and 31%, respectively. Quinclorac at 420 g/ha plus chlorsulfuron:metsulfuron (5:1) at 35 g a.i./ha applied PRE increased wheat yield 28% at one of three sites. At two of these sites, averaged over chlorsulfuron:metsulfuron rates of 0, 18, and 35 g a.i./ha, quinclorac at 280 and 420 g/ha applied POST, increased wheat yield 32 to 112%. In two cultivar tolerance experiments, quinclorac treatments did not damage any cultivar. Pooled over cultivars, yields were increased 7 and 10% when quinclorac at 280 and 560 kg/ha was applied, respectively. In a greenhouse experiment, quinclorac plus dicamba or esfenvalerate consistently reduced the leaf area of cheat in a manner suggesting synergistic effects. Of eight adjuvants evaluated in a laboratory experiment, only quinclorac plus the adjuvant BCH 864 01S reduced cheat leaf area more than quinclorac alone.

Influence of droplet size of foliar-applied nitrogen on grain protein content of hard red winter wheat

Crops & Soils ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 48-58
Author(s):  
Ethan C. Wyatt ◽  
Jacob T. Bushong ◽  
Natasha E. Macnack ◽  
Jeremiah L. Mullock ◽  
Randy Taylor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Protein Content ◽  
Droplet Size ◽  
Grain Protein Content ◽  
Grain Protein ◽  
Hard Red Winter Wheat ◽  
Red Winter Wheat ◽  
Applied Nitrogen
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document