The paper gives the case histories of discovery in three major oil field areas-Iran, northern Alaska and the North Sea. These areas differ in their regional features and in the consequent requirements for geological and geophysical investigation and delineation. In Iran the earlier discoveries were based entirely on surface geology; geophysics became important with the need for deep survey. In northern Alaska structures mapped at surface gave only minor shows. Seismic surveys following geological deductions on reservoir development led to discovery of the giant Prudhoe Bay field near the Arctic coast. In the North Sea, in the much more complex extension of Permian-Mesozoic basins already well known on land, location of structures has been entirely by seismic survey.There is no close relation between the new Global Tectonics and the location of major oil field belts. The factors controlling the latter are multiple and complex. Resolution of the relative importance of vertical (epeirogenic) displacement as against the effect of lateral plate movement is nevertheless critical, particularly in Alaska.There is at present a large unresolved discrepancy between the times at which some continental margins developed (North Atlantic, East and West Indian Ocean) and with the physical evidence of sea floor spreading. In the three areas quoted, breakdown of the continental margins by vertical movements started in the Permian (—280 million years), but spreading is dated as beginning only in the late Cretaceous (—70 million years). It is the earlier movements, unexplained by current global theories, which have most relevance for petroleum exploration.
Lg-wave propagation and crustal structure differences near Denmark and the North Sea
