The control of directed myogenic cell migration in the avian limb bud

1989 ◽  
Vol 180 (6) ◽  
pp. 555-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Brand-Saberi ◽  
V. Krenn ◽  
B. Christ
Development ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-125
Author(s):  
Madeleine Gumpel-Pinot ◽  
D. A. Ede ◽  
O. P. Flint

Fragments of quail wing bud containing myogenic cells of somitic origin and fragments of quail sphlanchopleural tissue were introduced into the interior of the wing bud of fowl embryo hosts. No movement of graft into host tissue occurred in the control, but myogenic cells from the quail wing bud fragments underwent long migrations in an apical direction to become incorporated in the developing musculature of the host. When the apical ectodermal ridge (AER), together with some subridge mesenchyme, was removed at the time of grafting, no such cell migration occurred. The capacity of grafted myogenic cells to migrate in the presence of AER persists to H.H. stage 25, when myogenesis has begun, but premyogenic cells in the somites, which normally migrate out into the early limb bud, do not migrate when somite fragments are grafted into the wing bud. Coelomic grafts of apical and proximal wing fragments showed that apical sections of quail wing buds become invaded by myogenic cells of the host, but grafts from proximal wing bud regions do not.


2004 ◽  
Vol 279 (52) ◽  
pp. 54862-54871 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuhiro Kawamura ◽  
Kazunori Takano ◽  
Shiro Suetsugu ◽  
Shusaku Kurisu ◽  
Daisuke Yamazaki ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 16 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 705
Author(s):  
J. Morgan ◽  
P. Bausero ◽  
J. Gross ◽  
M. Fiszman ◽  
H. Alameddine
Keyword(s):  

Development ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 121 (3) ◽  
pp. 661-669 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Hayashi ◽  
E. Ozawa

It is known that myogenic cells in limb buds are derived from somites. In order to examine the potential of the limb primordium (presumptive limb somatopleure) to induce myogenic cell migration, we transplanted chick presumptive limb somatopleure to the flank region of an embryo, a region that does not normally contribute myogenic cells to the limb. Somitic cell migration was examined using a vital labeling technique. When the presumptive limb somatopleure was transplanted and was in contact with the host flank somite, somitic-cell migration toward the graft was observed. The labeled somitic cells within the graft were identified as myogenic cells in two ways: first, we found that N-cadherin-expressing cells appeared in the graft. Second, after 3 further days of incubation, the somitic cells formed dorsal and ventral masses and expressed sarcomeric myosin heavy chain within the graft. Cell migration occurred only when the somite was in contact with the medial region of the presumptive limb somatopleure. When the somite was not in contact with the limb somatopleure, or when the somite was in contact with the lateral region of the limb somatopleure, migration did not occur. These observations indicate that the potential to induce myogenic cell migration is restricted to the medial region of the presumptive limb somatopleure and that tissue contact is required.


1989 ◽  
Vol 180 (3) ◽  
pp. 293-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. K. H. Lee ◽  
D. A. Ede
Keyword(s):  
Limb Bud ◽  

2010 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 584-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Morgan ◽  
Andrée Rouche ◽  
Pedro Bausero ◽  
Amal Houssaïni ◽  
Jacqueline Gross ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Cell Cycle ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (22) ◽  
pp. 3167-3181
Author(s):  
Yumi Konagaya ◽  
Kanako Takakura ◽  
Maina Sogabe ◽  
Anjali Bisaria ◽  
Chad Liu ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 110 (9) ◽  
pp. 1083-1089 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Bonavaud ◽  
C. Charriere-Bertrand ◽  
C. Rey ◽  
M.P. Leibovitch ◽  
N. Pedersen ◽  
...  

Urokinase can form a tripartite complex binding urokinase receptor (uPAR) and plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 (PAI-1), a component of the extracellular matrix (ECM). The components of the tripartite complex are modulated throughout the in vitro myogenic differentiation process. A series of experiments aimed at elucidating the role of the urokinase tripartite complex in the fusion of human myogenic cells were performed in vitro. Myogenic cell fusion was associated with increased cell-associated urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) activity, cell-associated uPAR, and uPAR occupancy. Incubation of cultures with either uPA anticatalytic antibodies, or the amino-terminal fragment of uPA (ATF), which inhibits competitively uPA binding to its receptor, or anti-PAI-1 antibodies, which inhibit uPA binding to PAI-1, resulted in a 30 to 47% decrease in fusion. Incubation of cultures with the plasmin inhibitor aprotinin did not affect fusion. Decreased fusion rates induced by interfering with uPAR/uPA/PAI-1 interactions were not associated with significant changes in mRNA levels of both the myogenic regulatory factor myogenin and its inhibitor of DNA binding, Id. Incubation of cultures with purified uPA resulted in a decrease in fusion, likely due to a competitive inhibition of PAI-1 binding of endogenous uPA. We conclude that muscle cell fusion largely depends on interactions between the members of the urokinase complex (uPAR/uPA/PAI-1), but does not require proteolytic activation of plasmin. Since the intrinsic muscle cell differentiation program appears poorly affected by the state of integrity of the urokinase complex, and since cell migration is a prerequisite for muscle cell fusion in vitro, it is likely that the urokinase system is instrumental in fusion through its connection with the cell migration process. Our results suggest that the urokinase tripartite complex may be involved in cell migration in a non conventional way, playing the role of an adhesion system bridging cell membrane to ECM.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document