Cytological studies of ameiotic and normal maize with reference to premeiotic pairing

Chromosoma ◽  
1971 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 233-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reid G. Palmer
Keyword(s):  
2016 ◽  
Vol 139 ◽  
pp. 10-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anju Teng ◽  
Torsten Witt ◽  
Kai Wang ◽  
Ming Li ◽  
Jovin Hasjim

2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (65) ◽  
pp. 14293-14301 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Nkongolo K ◽  
Mbuya K ◽  
Mehes Smith M ◽  
Kalonji Mbuyi A

2018 ◽  
Vol 99 (5) ◽  
pp. 2205-2214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aditya-Abha Singh ◽  
Shashi B Agrawal ◽  
Jay P Shahi ◽  
Madhoolika Agrawal

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 050-059
Author(s):  
B.T. Olowookere ◽  
◽  
E.O. Uyovbisere ◽  
A.A. Oyerinde ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 2073-2084 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi ZHOU ◽  
Zhi-Yuan FU ◽  
Qing LI ◽  
Shu-Tu XU ◽  
Subhash CHANDER ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 440-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiantao Qi ◽  
Hao Wu ◽  
Haiyang Jiang ◽  
Jinjie Zhu ◽  
Changling Huang ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 56 (No. 1) ◽  
pp. 8-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Zhang ◽  
Z. Wu ◽  
Y. Jiang ◽  
L. Chen ◽  
Y. Song ◽  
...  

A micro-plot field experiment with reduced urea <sup>15</sup>N application was conducted to study the effects of urease inhibitor NBPT (N-(<i>n</i>-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide) and nitrification inhibitor DMPP(3,4-dimethyl-1H-pyrazolium dihydrogen) on the fate of applied urea <sup>15</sup>N; it aimed to find an efficient way to reduce the urea N application rate while improving the agronomic and environmental benefits. Five treatments were installed, i.e., 180 kg N/ha (N<sub>1</sub>, conventional application rate), 126 kg N/ha (N<sub>2</sub>, reduced to 70% conventional application rate), N<sub>2</sub> + NBPT, N<sub>2</sub> + DMPP, and N<sub>2</sub> + NBPT + DMPP. Compared with treatment N<sub>1</sub>, all the other treatments had a significantly higher total <sup>15</sup>N recovery by both soil and plant (<i>P</i> < 0.05 48.20, 41.39, 37.69, 38.85 and 34.83% soil recovery for N<sub>2</sub> + NBPT + DMPP, N<sub>2</sub> + DMPP, N<sub>2</sub> + NBPT, N<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>1</sub>treatment, respectively; and 42.68, 40.86, 40.25, 37.18 and 36.30% plant recovery for N<sub>2</sub> + NBPT + DMPP, N<sub>2</sub> + DMPP, N<sub>2</sub> + NBPT, N<sub>2</sub>, and N<sub>1</sub> treatment, respectively). In the plant <sup>15</sup>N recovery, the <sup>15</sup>N absorbed in grain/stem was highest in treatment N<sub>2</sub> + NBPT + DMPP. The maize biomass and the maize yield had a slight increase in treatment N<sub>2</sub> + NBPT + DMPP, compared with those in treatment N<sub>1</sub>. In sum, for the maize production in study area, N<sub>2</sub> + NBPT + DMPP application method would be a feasible way to ensure the normal maize yield while improving yield quality, saving urea fertilizer, and protecting the environment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document