Calculation of the parameters of elastic strain-gauge systems for measuring pressure

1980 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. 724-727
Author(s):  
I. G. Minaev ◽  
E. N. Malyi
2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (9(78)) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
Николай Борисович Копытчук ◽  
Петр Метталинович Тишин ◽  
Игорь Николаевич Копытчук

1979 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 1352-1354
Author(s):  
A. I. Beklemishchev ◽  
B. S. Dulov ◽  
N. P. Klokova ◽  
V. V. Kedrov

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (2(23)) ◽  
pp. 89
Author(s):  
Николай Борисович Копытчук ◽  
Петр Метталинович Тишин ◽  
Игорь Николаевич Копытчук ◽  
Игорь Генрикович Милейко

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Jiazi Gao ◽  
Bei Liu ◽  
Min Zhang ◽  
He Gong ◽  
Bingzhao Gao

This study is aimed at providing an effective method for determining strain-load relationship and at quantifying the strain distribution within the whole tibia under axial compressive load on rats. Rat tibial models with axial compressive load were designed. Strains in three directions (0°, 45°, and 90°) at the proximal shaft of the tibia were measured by using a strain gauge rosette, which was used to calculate the maximum and minimum principal strains. Moreover, the strain at the midshaft of the tibia was measured by a single-element strain gauge. The slopes of the strain-load curves with different peak loads were calculated to assess the stability of the strain gauge measurement. Mechanical environment in the whole tibia by the axial compressive load was quantified using finite element analysis (FEA) based on microcomputed tomography images. The von Mises elastic strain distributions of the whole tibiae were evaluated. Slopes of the strain-load curves showed no significant differences among different peak loads (ANOVA; P>0.05), indicating that the strain-load relationship obtained from the strain gauge measurement was reasonable and stable. The FEA results corresponded to the experimental results with an error smaller than 15% (paired Student’s t-test, P>0.05), signifying that the FEA can simulate the experiment reasonably. FEA results showed that the von Mises elastic strain was the lowest in the middle and gradually increased to both sides along the lateral direction, with the maximal von Mises elastic strain being observed on the posterior side under the distal tibiofibular synostosis. The method of strain gauge measurements and FEA used in this study can provide a feasible way to obtain the mechanical environment of the tibiae under axial compressive load on the rats and serve as a reference for further exploring the mechanical response of the bone by axial compressive load.


2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 1494-1502 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.K.T. Grattan ◽  
S.E. Taylor ◽  
Tong Sun ◽  
P.A.M. Basheer ◽  
K.T.V. Grattan

Langmuir ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (13) ◽  
pp. 7496-7505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vamsi K. Yadavalli ◽  
Jeffrey G. Forbes ◽  
Kuan Wang

1993 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. G. Beck Mason ◽  
Tomas Valis ◽  
W. D. Hogg

2013 ◽  
Vol 74 (5) ◽  
pp. 891-897 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. N. Stepanova ◽  
S. I. Kabanov ◽  
S. A. Bekher ◽  
M. S. Nikitenko

Author(s):  
J. Temple Black

The output of the ultramicrotomy process with its high strain levels is dependent upon the input, ie., the nature of the material being machined. Apart from the geometrical constraints offered by the rake and clearance faces of the tool, each material is free to deform in whatever manner necessary to satisfy its material structure and interatomic constraints. Noncrystalline materials appear to survive the process undamaged when observed in the TEM. As has been demonstrated however microtomed plastics do in fact suffer damage to the top and bottom surfaces of the section regardless of the sharpness of the cutting edge or the tool material. The energy required to seperate the section from the block is not easily propogated through the section because the material is amorphous in nature and has no preferred crystalline planes upon which defects can move large distances to relieve the applied stress. Thus, the cutting stresses are supported elastically in the internal or bulk and plastically in the surfaces. The elastic strain can be recovered while the plastic strain is not reversible and will remain in the section after cutting is complete.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document