The Earth's palaeorotation, postglacial rebound and lower mantle viscosity from analysis of ancient Chinese eclipse records

1995 ◽  
Vol 145 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 459-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin D. Pang ◽  
Kevin Yau ◽  
Hung-Hsiang Chou
2020 ◽  
Vol 224 (2) ◽  
pp. 961-972
Author(s):  
A G Semple ◽  
A Lenardic

SUMMARY Previous studies have shown that a low viscosity upper mantle can impact the wavelength of mantle flow and the balance of plate driving to resisting forces. Those studies assumed that mantle viscosity is independent of mantle flow. We explore the potential that mantle flow is not only influenced by viscosity but can also feedback and alter mantle viscosity structure owing to a non-Newtonian upper-mantle rheology. Our results indicate that the average viscosity of the upper mantle, and viscosity variations within it, are affected by the depth to which a non-Newtonian rheology holds. Changes in the wavelength of mantle flow, that occur when upper-mantle viscosity drops below a critical value, alter flow velocities which, in turn, alter mantle viscosity. Those changes also affect flow profiles in the mantle and the degree to which mantle flow drives the motion of a plate analogue above it. Enhanced upper-mantle flow, due to an increasing degree of non-Newtonian behaviour, decreases the ratio of upper- to lower-mantle viscosity. Whole layer mantle convection is maintained but upper- and lower-mantle flow take on different dynamic forms: fast and concentrated upper-mantle flow; slow and diffuse lower-mantle flow. Collectively, mantle viscosity, mantle flow wavelengths, upper- to lower-mantle velocities and the degree to which the mantle can drive plate motions become connected to one another through coupled feedback loops. Under this view of mantle dynamics, depth-variable mantle viscosity is an emergent flow feature that both affects and is affected by the configuration of mantle and plate flow.


1996 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 318-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Le Meur

Accounting for isostasy in glaciological models has always been a necessity but these models mostly use very simple parameterizations (Le Meur and Huybrechts, 1996). The need for more realistic isostatic parameterizations rapidly became apparent, especially in the treatment of bedrock-sensitive issues such as the grounding-line migration (Huybrechts, 1990a, b). To this end, a rather sophisticated Earth model, avoiding most of the common assumptions, has been developed and is presented here. The two key groups of parameters, to which the model is most sensitive, are the Earth properties and the rheological law used for the mantle. The aim of this paper is first to justify the use of Maxwell rheology for the mantle and then to tune the most sensitive Earth parameter, namely the mantle viscosity, in order to match the numerous present-day uplift data over Fennoscandia. So, in the first instance, a short review of the different available rheologies is presented and discussed. The visco-elastic theory, as well as the mathematical background used in the present model, is also briefly sketched. Secondly, a glacial scenario over Fennoscandia served as an input for the model in a calibration test on the mantle-viscosity values. The degree of agreement of the model outputs with the present-day measurements gives a reference set of Green functions, to which one can reasonably refer when modelling the isostatic response over areas where such a control is not possible (Le Meur and Huybrechts, 1996). Finally, a closer look to the time-dependent surface displacements will confirm the ability for the model to reproduce correctly the main postglacial rebound characteristic features.


1980 ◽  
Vol 78 ◽  
pp. 153-156
Author(s):  
T. V. Ruzmaikina

I wish to discuss an effect that is caused by the secular decrease in the Earth's rotation. I shall show that this deceleration induces mass flows across level surfaces and that these flows redistribute temperature and density in the Earth and produce an excess equatorial bulge. This mechanism does not require large lower mantle viscosity, unlike mechanisms discussed by Munk and MacDonald (1960) and McKenzie (1966). Therefore it does not suffer from the difficulties pointed out by Goldreich and Toomre (1969).


1985 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 361-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Sabadini ◽  
D. A. Yuen ◽  
P. Gasperini

2017 ◽  
Vol 212 (3) ◽  
pp. 2206-2225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masao Nakada ◽  
Jun’ichi Okuno ◽  
Yoshiya Irie

2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (21) ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Stein ◽  
A. Finnenkötter ◽  
J. P. Lowman ◽  
U. Hansen

1996 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 318-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Le Meur

Accounting for isostasy in glaciological models has always been a necessity but these models mostly use very simple parameterizations (Le Meur and Huybrechts, 1996). The need for more realistic isostatic parameterizations rapidly became apparent, especially in the treatment of bedrock-sensitive issues such as the grounding-line migration (Huybrechts, 1990a, b). To this end, a rather sophisticated Earth model, avoiding most of the common assumptions, has been developed and is presented here. The two key groups of parameters, to which the model is most sensitive, are the Earth properties and the rheological law used for the mantle. The aim of this paper is first to justify the use of Maxwell rheology for the mantle and then to tune the most sensitive Earth parameter, namely the mantle viscosity, in order to match the numerous present-day uplift data over Fennoscandia. So, in the first instance, a short review of the different available rheologies is presented and discussed. The visco-elastic theory, as well as the mathematical background used in the present model, is also briefly sketched. Secondly, a glacial scenario over Fennoscandia served as an input for the model in a calibration test on the mantle-viscosity values. The degree of agreement of the model outputs with the present-day measurements gives a reference set of Green functions, to which one can reasonably refer when modelling the isostatic response over areas where such a control is not possible (Le Meur and Huybrechts, 1996). Finally, a closer look to the time-dependent surface displacements will confirm the ability for the model to reproduce correctly the main postglacial rebound characteristic features.


2001 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 727-733
Author(s):  
Zhi-Gen YANG ◽  
C.K. SHUM

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document