Item level validity of the Devereux Elementary School Behavior Rating Scale

1979 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 327-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerry Willis ◽  
Deborrah Smithy ◽  
Steve Holliday
1983 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 275-278
Author(s):  
Marcia D. Horne ◽  
James E. Powers

The purpose of this study was to investigate the self-perceived status of students ( N = 48) rated by their teachers as high and low in aggressive behavior on an 8-item modified version of the Devereaux School Behavior Rating Scale. In Grades 2, 3, and 4, 4 boys and 4 girls rated low in aggression and 4 boys and 4 girls rated high in aggression by their teachers were randomly selected. A significant interaction of grade by aggression indicated differences in perceived status depending on grade and teachers' ratings of aggression. Students in Grades 2 and 3 who were rated high in aggression perceived themselves as more popular, but those in Grades 4 and 5 so rated perceived themselves as less popular.


1976 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1163-1174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane D. Wallbrown ◽  
Ann W. Engin ◽  
Fred H. Wallbrown ◽  
John Blaha

The construct validity of the Devereux Elementary School Behavior Rating Scale (Spivack & Swift, 1967) was investigated for a sample of 408 children enrolled in the 15 kindergarten classes of a suburban school system. The 9 teachers completed behavioral ratings for the children in their classes during 1 wk. in May, 1974. A principal-factor solution was obtained on intercorrelations among the 47 behaviors included in the Devereux scale and the factors thus obtained were rotated to Varimax criterion. The results were generally positive in that 9 of the 11 behavioral dimensions described by Spivack and Swift (1967) were evident in the factor structure. Yet, there were enough differences to suggest the possibility of modifying the Devereux score categories somewhat for use with suburban kindergarten children. For example, the three individual items did not remain distinct and two dimensions did not emerge as factors. Also, the items loading the 9 factors were not always exactly the same as those which the authors specified for the corresponding behavioral dimensions.


1989 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 535-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Finkelman ◽  
Michael J. Ferrarese ◽  
Norman Garmezy

This investigation explored the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Devereux Elementary School Behavior Raring Scale, employing a large ( n = 648) sample of children. Factor analysis suggested that the Devereux scale can be described by four factors, which were named Disruptive—Oppositional, Poor Comprehension—Disattention, Cooperative—Initiating, and Performance Anxiety. All four factors showed high internal consistency, and three of the four were stable over a 17-mo. period. Correlations of the four factors with academic achievement, IQ, socioeconomic status, and peer ratings of social competence are presented. All four factors showed significant relations with these variables, with Poor Comprehension—Disattention the strongest of all. Multiple regression analysis indicated that the Poor Comprehension—Disattention factor accounted for significant variance in academic achievement even after IQ was taken into account. Large differences between classroom means on the factor scores suggested that Devereux ratings for individual students may need to be interpreted cautiously.


1976 ◽  
Vol 70 (6) ◽  
pp. 251-256
Author(s):  
Linda J. Ross ◽  
Patricia A. Gallagher

This study examines how well Devereux behavior rating scales perform as sensitive and reliable instruments for delineating inappropriate behavior among visually impaired children at a residential school. Three Devereux scales were administered: the Child Behavior Rating Scale; the Adolescent Behavior Rating Scale; and the Elementary School Behavior Rating Scale. Students were rated on the scales, from which obviously inappropriate items had been deleted by houseparents and teachers. One week later, a random sample of students was selected for re-evaluation, as a measure of test-retest reliability. The results suggest that the scales could be viable evaluation instruments, though the Child Behavior Rating Scale showed unacceptable test-retest reliability.


1989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yossef S. Ben-Porath ◽  
Carolyn L. Williams ◽  
Craig Uchiyama

1989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yossef S. Ben-Porath ◽  
Carolyn L. Williams ◽  
Craig Uchiyama

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document