Dereverberation of marine reflection seismic data by a spatial combination of predictive deconvolution and velocity filtering

1995 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Samson ◽  
G. F. West
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feisal Dirgantara ◽  
Andrew Tien-Shun Lin ◽  
Char-Shine Liu ◽  
Song-Chuen Chen

<p>Reducing multiple contaminations in reflection seismic data remains one of the greatest challenges in seismic processing and its effectiveness is highly dependent on geologic settings. We undertook two-dimensional reflection seismic data crossing the upper and lower accretionary wedge slopes off SW Taiwan to test the efficiency of various multiple-attenuation scenarios. The area has resulted from an incipient arc-continent collision between the northern rifted margin of the South China Sea and the Luzon volcanic arcs. The wedge extends from shallow water to deep water bathymetries, hence promoting both short-period and long-period multiples within the seismic records. The multichannel seismic data were achieved under 468 hydrophones, 4-ms sampling rate, 12.5-m channel spacing, 50-m shot spacing and 15-second recording length. Preprocessing flow includes swell noise removal, direct wave mute, and missing channel and shot restoration. A subset of demultiple methods based on the periodicity nature and the spatial move-out behavior of multiples were explored to attenuate multiples energy under different geologic environments. The first step relies on the simultaneous subtraction of surface-related multiples, which combined wave-equation multiple attenuation (WEMA) and surface-related multiple elimination (SRME). WEMA is a shot domain multiple attenuations based on a combination of numerical wave extrapolation through the water layer and the water bottom reflectivity. This method was capable to partially suppress the water layer multiples. SRME was applied to attenuate the residual multiple energy at near-offset. This method assumes surface-related multiples can be kinematically predicted by convolution of prestack seismic traces at possible surface multiple reflection locations. Some primary reflections seem to be better retained after the combined subtraction process than using WEMA or SRME filtering independently. The second step lies on parabolic Radon transform to attenuate far-offset multiples by subtracting the noise energy in <em>tau-p</em> on input gathers that have been corrected for normal move-out and inverse transform the remaining primary energy back to CMP-offset domain. Predictive deconvolution in the <em>x-t</em> domain was performed to attenuate low-frequency reverberations in the upper wedge slope. A double-gap deconvolution operator was extended to predict reverberations with correct relative amplitudes, followed by time-variant bandpass filtering to reduce much of residual multiple energy. In general, WEMA and predictive deconvolution were more effective in attenuating the multiples energy at the upper wedge slope where the water depths are shallower; whereas SRME and parabolic Radon were capable of reducing the energy of multiples at the lower wedge slope. Nevertheless, multiples energy could not be fully eliminated due to several factors. The dependency of some demultiple methods (e.g. parabolic Radon, WEMA, SRME) on velocity function may perturb the forward multiple predictions before subtraction as primary velocities might not be present due to the highly tilted strata in the thrust belts domain. Furthermore, parabolic Radon may not perform well in shallow water and area with slowly increasing velocities with depth (e.g. the upper wedge slope). Since the reflection seismic dataset spans various tectonic environments and water depth, results suggest there was no single demultiple method capable to suppress multiples in all environments.</p>


Geophysics ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 48 (7) ◽  
pp. 854-886 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken Larner ◽  
Ron Chambers ◽  
Mai Yang ◽  
Walt Lynn ◽  
Willon Wai

Despite significant advances in marine streamer design, seismic data are often plagued by coherent noise having approximately linear moveout across stacked sections. With an understanding of the characteristics that distinguish such noise from signal, we can decide which noise‐suppression techniques to use and at what stages to apply them in acquisition and processing. Three general mechanisms that might produce such noise patterns on stacked sections are examined: direct and trapped waves that propagate outward from the seismic source, cable motion caused by the tugging action of the boat and tail buoy, and scattered energy from irregularities in the water bottom and sub‐bottom. Depending upon the mechanism, entirely different noise patterns can be observed on shot profiles and common‐midpoint (CMP) gathers; these patterns can be diagnostic of the dominant mechanism in a given set of data. Field data from Canada and Alaska suggest that the dominant noise is from waves scattered within the shallow sub‐buttom. This type of noise, while not obvious on the shot records, is actually enhanced by CMP stacking. Moreover, this noise is not confined to marine data; it can be as strong as surface wave noise on stacked land seismic data as well. Of the many processing tools available, moveout filtering is best for suppressing the noise while preserving signal. Since the scattered noise does not exhibit a linear moveout pattern on CMP‐sorted gathers, moveout filtering must be applied either to traces within shot records and common‐receiver gathers or to stacked traces. Our data example demonstrates that although it is more costly, moveout filtering of the unstacked data is particularly effective because it conditions the data for the critical data‐dependent processing steps of predictive deconvolution and velocity analysis.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pimpawee Sittipan ◽  
Pisanu Wongpornchai

Some of the important petroleum reservoirs accumulate beneath the seas and oceans. Marine seismic reflection method is the most efficient method and is widely used in the petroleum industry to map and interpret the potential of petroleum reservoirs. Multiple reflections are a particular problem in marine seismic reflection investigation, as they often obscure the target reflectors in seismic profiles. Multiple reflections can be categorized by considering the shallowest interface on which the bounces take place into two types: internal multiples and surface-related multiples. Besides, the multiples can be categorized on the interfaces where the bounces take place, a difference between long-period and short-period multiples can be considered. The long-period surface-related multiples on 2D marine seismic data of the East Coast of the United States-Southern Atlantic Margin were focused on this research. The seismic profile demonstrates the effectiveness of the results from predictive deconvolution and the combination of surface-related multiple eliminations (SRME) and parabolic Radon filtering. First, predictive deconvolution applied on conventional processing is the method of multiple suppression. The other, SRME is a model-based and data-driven surface-related multiple elimination method which does not need any assumptions. And the last, parabolic Radon filtering is a moveout-based method for residual multiple reflections based on velocity discrimination between primary and multiple reflections, thus velocity model and normal-moveout correction are required for this method. The predictive deconvolution is ineffective for long-period surface-related multiple removals. However, the combination of SRME and parabolic Radon filtering can attenuate almost long-period surface-related multiple reflections and provide a high-quality seismic images of marine seismic data.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tumpal Bernhard Nainggolan ◽  
Said Muhammad Rasidin ◽  
Imam Setiadi

Multiple often and always appear in marine seismic data due to very high acoustic impedance contrasts. These events have undergone more than one reflection. This causes the signal to arrive back at the receiver at an erroneous time, which, in turn, causes false results and can result in data misinterpretation. Several types of multiple suppression have been studied in literature. Methods that attenuate multiples can be classified into three broad categories: deconvolution methods; filtering methods and wavefield prediction subtraction methods. The study area is situated on Seram Sea in between 131°15’E – 132°45’E and 3°0’S – 4°0’S, Seram Trough which is located beneath Seram Sea at northern part of the Banda-Arc – Australian collision zone and currently the site of contraction between Bird’s Head and Seram. This research uses predictive deconvolution and FK-filter to attenuate short period multiple from their move out, then continued by SRME method to predict multiple that cannot be attenuated from previous method, then followed by Radon transform to attenuate multiple that still left and cannot be attenuated by SRME method. The result of each method then compared to each other to see how well multiple attenuated. Predictive deconvolution and F-K filter could not give satisfactory result especially complex area where multiple in dipping event is not periodic, SRME method successfully attenuate multiple especially in near offset multiple without need subsurface information, while SRME method fails to attenuate long offset multiple, combination of SRME method and Radon transform can give satisfactory result with careful selection of the Radon transform parameters because it can obscure some primary reflectors. Based on geological interpretation, Seram Trough is built by dominant structural style of deposited fold and thrust belt. The deposited fold and thrust belt has a complexly fault geometry from western zone until eastern of seismic line.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document