Counterion binding on mixed anionic/cationic micelles

1988 ◽  
Vol 266 (10) ◽  
pp. 954-957 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Filipović-Vinceković ◽  
D. Škrtić
2017 ◽  
Vol 375 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Khalisanni Khalid ◽  
Muhammad Azri Mohd Noh ◽  
Sharifuddin Md. Zain ◽  
M. Niyaz Khan

1985 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 598-601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leong-Huat Gan

Cationic micelles of hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide, chloride, and hydroxide (CTABr, CTACl, and CTAOH) greatly enhance the stability of anionic σ-complex formed by hydroxide ion and 1,3,5-trinitrobenzene (TNB). The counterion binding to the micellar head groups is assumed to vary but is governed by a distribution constant. Different distribution constants are used for different types of counterion. Using this treatment, the rate constant – surfactant concentration profiles for the reactions of TNB with hydroxide ion in CTAOH, CTABr, and CTACl can all be satisfactorily accounted for, yielding consistent results in various conditions. The ion distribution constants, KOH = 55 mol−1 dm3, KBr = 1800 mol−1 dm3, and KCl = 420 mol−1 dm3 and the rate constant KM = 3600 s−1 are obtained. In view of the success of this treatment, the assumption of a constant β value associated with the pseudophase model at best could only be viewed as an approximation, valid only for micellar systems with tightly bound counterions such as those in the micelles of CTABr.


Langmuir ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunda Ji ◽  
Chao Zhou ◽  
Bintao Zhao ◽  
Jingfa Yang ◽  
Jiang Zhao

2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (12) ◽  
pp. 3684-3692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alok Chakrabarty ◽  
Paramita Das ◽  
Arabinda Mallick ◽  
Nitin Chattopadhyay

Langmuir ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 653-657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar A. El Seoud ◽  
Andrei Blasko ◽  
Clifford A. Bunton

1979 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 443-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald S. Manning

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document