Familial essential thrombocythemia: Clinical characteristics of 11 cases in one family

Abstract Introduction: Essential thrombocythemia (ET) is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by clonal platelet production and an increased risk for thrombotic and hemorrhagic events. Limited real-world data exist regarding the clinical characteristics and treatment patterns of ET in the United States; most prior data have been generated outside the United States. The Myelofibrosis and Essential Thrombocythemia Observational STudy (MOST) is an ongoing observational study being conducted to describe contemporary demographics, burden of disease, clinical management, and patient-reported outcomes in patients with specific risk categories of myelofibrosis (MF) or ET in the United States. This analysis describes the clinical characteristics of patients with ET currently enrolled in MOST. Methods: MOST is a multicenter, noninterventional, prospective, observational study in patients with a clinical diagnosis of specific risk categories of MF or ET (NCT02953704). Eligible patients with ET included high-risk patients (≥ 60 years of age and/or a history of thromboembolic events [TEs]), or low-risk patients currently receiving ET-directed therapy. Key exclusion criteria included participation in blinded investigational drug studies, life expectancy ≤ 6 months, or diagnosis of other malignancy. Data regarding disease and clinical characteristics are collected at usual-care visits over a planned 36-month observation period. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics at enrollment were described with descriptive statistics. Results: At data cutoff (May 18, 2018), 793 eligible patients were enrolled from 85 sites since November 29, 2016. The median age at enrollment was 70 (range, 24-95) years, 66.5% were female, and 89.8% were Caucasian. The median time from ET diagnosis to enrollment was 4.2 (range, 0.0-42.1) years with a proportion of patients diagnosed within 1 year (19.5%), 1 to < 5 years (35.0%), 5 to < 10 years (21.7%), or ≥ 10 years (23.8%) of enrollment. Approximately 40% of patients were retired and 42.7% were working full- or part-time at enrollment. A total of 212 patients (26.7%) had a history of TE at the time of enrollment. The type of TE was available for 148 patients, the most common was arterial events (53.4%); 33.1% had venous, and 13.5% of patients had both arterial and venous events. Six hundred and eighty-eight patients (86.8%) were classified as high-risk. Assessments at the time of ET diagnosis, among evaluable patients, included bone marrow biopsy (51.4%; 393/765) and mutational testing (77.2%; 590/764). Three hundred and forty-nine patients had mutation test results reported at the time of diagnosis; of patients with JAK2 V617F test results reported at the time of diagnosis (n = 313), 78.6% were positive for JAK2 V617F (Table 1). Laboratory values and peripheral blood counts were reported for patients with available data (Table 2). The majority of patients (87.9%) had received at least 1 ET-directed therapy prior to enrollment, which in some cases was the same medication the patient was receiving at the time of enrollment. At the time of enrollment, 740 patients (93.3%) were receiving at least 1 current ET-directed therapy, including HU (71.6%; 530/740), anagrelide (13.1%; 97/740), ruxolitinib (4.7%; 35/740), interferon (3.0%; 22/740), and busulfan (0.3%; 2/740). Of 793 patients, the most frequently occurring relevant comorbid conditions were hypertension (52.7%), history of smoking (44.7%), and hyperlipidemia (24.1%). Among 761 patients with ET-related symptoms assessed at diagnosis, the most common symptoms documented by healthcare providers included constitutional (22.9%), vasomotor (16.0%), and spleen-associated symptoms (3.9%), and pruritus (2.6%). Conclusions: Prior real-world data in ET has predominately been generated outside of the United States or has been reported from single institutional experiences. The MOST study will provide a more complete picture of the patient characteristics and outcomes of patients receiving ET-directed therapy in the United States. Ultimately, these data will be important for determining ET treatment gaps and areas of unmet need. Disclosures Yacoub: Cara Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Inycte: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Ardelyx, INC.: Equity Ownership; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Dynavax: Equity Ownership. Verstovsek:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Italfarmaco: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy. Shao:ASH: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ASCO: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Agrawal:Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Sivaraman:Incyte: Employment. Colucci:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yao:Incyte: Employment. Mascarenhas:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Promedior: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Clinical Characteristics and Cardioavscular Events in Patients with Esential Thrombocythemia with <10% Vs. ≥10% JAK2 V617F Allele Burden

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-126980 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4171-4171

Author(s):

Blanca Xicoy ◽

Natalia Estrada ◽

Alberto Alvarez-Larran ◽

Xavier Calvo Gonzalez ◽

Beatriz Bellosillo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Platelet Count ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Essential Thrombocythemia ◽

Clinical Characteristics ◽

Prognostic Score ◽

Jak2 V617f ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Allele Burden ◽

Therapeutic Algorithm ◽

Uncertain Significance

Introduction The clinical characteristics, treatment, cardiovascular events (CVE) and evolution of patients diagnosed with JAK2 V617F positive essential thrombocythemia (ET) with low allele burden (LAB) are scarcely studied. Its presence in people without a confirmed diagnosis of malignant hemopathy is called clonal hematopoiesis of uncertain significance (CHIP) and confers higher risk of developing CVE. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics and CVE of a series of JAK2 V617F-positive ET patients with <10% (LAB) vs. ≥10% allele burden (HAB), from the GEMFIN (Grupo Español de Enfermedades Mieloproliferativas Crónicas Filadelfia Negativas) Group. Methods From the database of the GEMFIN group, 410 ET patients were JAK2 V617F positive, 89 (21.7 %) with LAB and 321 (78.3%) with HAB. The clinical characteristics, treatment (cytoreduction, antiagregation, anticoagulation, JAK inhibitor), CVE (before, at and after diagnosis) and evolution to myelofibrosis (MF) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) of these two groups of patients were compared. Results LAB and HAB groups did not significantly differ regarding the main clinical characteristics (i.e cardiovascular risk factors [CVRF] and International Prognostic Score for Thrombosis in Essential Thrombocythemia [IPSET] score) except for the median platelet count: LAB 636 x109/L [436- 2500] vs HAB 687 x109/L[440-1980L], p=0.035). CVE after diagnosis of ET were more frequent in patients with HAB (41/137, 30%) than in patients with LAB (5/48, 10%), p=0.007. Only one LAB patient with CVE had JAK2 allele burden >5%. Treatments received by both groups were not significantly different. None of the patients from both groups progressed to AML, whereas 1/48 vs. 6/137 of patients evolved to MF. Median follow-up of patients with LAB and HAB was 3.4 years [0.1-17.7] and 4.3 years [0.1-27.8], respectively (Table 1). Conclusions In these series of ET patients from the GEMFIN group, patients with LAB had significantly lower median platelet count at diagnosis and less CVE after diagnosis than patients with HAB, although CVRF and IPSET scores and treatment approach were similar. The clinical behavior of LAB patients may resemble that of individuals with CHIP. The therapeutic algorithm of ET patients with LAB may be somehow different than that of patients with HAB and therefore, might be revised. Disclosures Bellosillo: Astra-Zeneca: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Biocartis: Honoraria; Merck-Serono: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Qiagen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Hoffman â€"La Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ThermoFisher: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Hernandez Boluda:Incyte: Other: Travel expenses paid. Pérez:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Essential thrombocythemia. Clinical characteristics and course of 61 cases

Cancer ◽

10.1002/1097-0142(19880615)61:12<2487::aid-cncr2820611217>3.0.co;2-t ◽

1988 ◽

Vol 61 (12) ◽

pp. 2487-2496 ◽

Cited By ~ 130

Author(s):

R. Hehlmann ◽

M. Jahn ◽

B. Baumann ◽

W. Köpcke

Keyword(s):

Essential Thrombocythemia ◽

Clinical Characteristics

Download Full-text

Impact of Mutation Status of ASXL1, EZH2, SRSF2, IDH1/2 on Clinical Phenotype and Prognosis in Patients with Post-Polycythemia and Post-Essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis: An AGIMM Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.1867.1867 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 1867-1867

Author(s):

Giada Rotunno ◽

Annalisa Pacilli ◽

Giada Brogi ◽

Valentina Artusi ◽

Elisa Rumi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Median Time ◽

Essential Thrombocythemia ◽

Clinical Characteristics ◽

Conflicts Of Interest ◽

Univariate Analysis ◽

Prognostic Variables ◽

Median Percentage ◽

Allele Burden ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: We reported that mutations in ASXL1, EZH2, IDH1/2 and SRSF2 are negative prognostic variables for survival in primary myelofibrosis (PMF). Patients harboring any one of these mutations comprise IPSS and DIPSS-plus independent high molecular risk (HMR) category. Conversely, prognostic variables in secondary myelofibrosis (sMF), including post-polycythemia vera (PPV) and post-essential thrombocythemia (PET) MF are not defined. Aims: The aim was to evaluate the correlations of HMR mutational status with hematologic characteristics and clinical presentation, and the role for outcome predition, in PPV- and PET-MF. Methods: PPV- and PET-MF were diagnosed by IWG-MRT criteria; all pts provided informed consent. Previously published methods were used to screen mutations involving JAK2,MPL, CALR, EZH2, ASXL1, IDH1/2 and SRSF2. The prognostic value of the molecular variables with regard to OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression. Results: A series of 200 sMF pts from 3 Italian centres was collected: 108 were PPV-MF (54%), 92 PET-MF (46%). PPV-MF cohort: Median age was 65y. Median follow up from PPV-MF diagnosis 4.7y (0.2-25.9y) and median time from PV to PPV-MF 10y (1.08-30.7y). Death occurred in 34 pts (31.8%), 7 pts (6.5%) developed leukemia. Median OS from PPV-MF diagnosis was 9.5y (7.1-11.9y). Frequency of mutations was: JAK2V617F 100% (median allele burden 77%, range 23-100), ASXL1 17.8%, EZH2 3.7%, IDH 5.6%, SRSF2 1%; 29 patients (26.9%) were classified as HMR cases. Hematologic characteristics: median leucocytes 13.0x109/L, hemoglobin 13.3g/dL, platelets 328x109/L, blasts ≥1% 23.4%. Constitutional symptoms in 45.8%, splenomegaly 94.1% (43.3% >10cm from LCM), pruritus 49%; median percentage of BM cellularity was 90% (25-100%) and grade 3 fibrosis in 16.8%. Overall 73 patients were evaluable for karyotype and abnormalities were detected in 42.5%. We did not find significant correlations between individual mutations or HMR category and hematologic and clinical characteristics. PET-MF cohort: Median age was 63.6y. Median follow up from the PET diagnosis 3.3y (0.2-14.5y), median time from ET to PET-MF 11.8y (0.9-30.6y). Death occurred in 30 pts (32.6%), 11 pts (12.0%) developed leukemia. Median OS from PET-MF diagnosis was 9.2y (4.9-13.6y). Frequency of mutations was: JAK2V617F 48.9% (median allele burden 49%, range 0-100), CALR 40.2%, MPL 4.3% and triple negativity (TN) 6.5%; ASXL1 29.3%, EZH2 6.5%, IDH 1.1%, SRSF2 3.3%; 33 pts (35.9%) were HMR. Hematologic characteristics: median leucokytes 8.0x109/L, hemoglobin 10.9 g/dL, platelets 375x109/L, blasts ≥1% 26.4%. Constitutional symptoms 35.4% of pts, splenomegaly 82% (18.2% >10cm from LCM), pruritus i31%; median percentage of BM cellularity was 70% (15-90%) and grade 3 fibrosis was found in 31.7%. Overall 56 patients were evaluable for karyotype and abnormalities were detected in 25.0%. By correlating hematologic and clinical characteristics with unique mutations and HMR category, we found that HMR mutated pts presented greater leukocytosis (P=0.04) and higher JAK2V617F allele burden (P=0.017) than pts in the low-molecular risk –LMR- category (ie, wild-type for ASXL1, EZH2, SRSF2, IDH1/2). Comparison of PPV-MF and PET-MF: a comparison of hematologic and clinical characteristics according to the diagnosis sMF disclosed that PPV-MF pts presented more frequently splenomegaly (P=0.008; for >10cm from LCM P<0.001), pruritus (P=0.009), abnormal karyotype (P=0.009), increased leukocytes (P<0.001), higher hemoglobin (P<0.001) and BM cellularity (P<0.001) compared with PET-MF. Conversely, PET-MF pts presented higher incidence of grade 3 of BM fibrosis (P=0.04). The median JAK2 allele burden (P<0.001) was higher in PPV-MF pts, while PET-MF pts showed more frequent mutations of ASXL1 (29.3% vs 17.8%; P=0.03). Univariate analysis disclosed significant correlations between shortened survival and mutated ASXL1 (P=0.02, HR 2.2 95% CI, 1.02-4.8) or EZH2 (P=0.05, HR 5.0 95% CI, 1.0-40.7) in PPV-MF. A HMR category was associated with reduced survival in PPV-MF: median survival 6.1y versus 9.5yr LMR (HR 1.07, 95%CI 1.0-4.4; P=0.04). In PET-MF survival was 4.8y in HMR versus 10.9y in LMR (HR1.6, 95%CI 0.8-3.4; P=0.2). Conclusion: We conclude that a HMR status is associated with shorter survival in sMF, but the overal impact is narrower than in primary MF, even though the rate of mutations is similar (Table1). Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text