Modelling motor cortex stimulation for chronic pain control: Electrical potential field, activating functions and responses of simple nerve fibre models

2005 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 335-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Manola ◽  
B. H. Roelofsen ◽  
J. Holsheimer ◽  
E. Marani ◽  
J. Geelen
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Nerve Fibre ◽  
Potential Field ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Electrical Potential ◽  
Motor Cortex Stimulation ◽  
Electrical Potential Field

Transcranial magnetic stimulation for pain control. Double-blind study of different frequencies against placebo, and correlation with motor cortex stimulation efficacy

2006 ◽  
Vol 117 (7) ◽  
pp. 1536-1544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathalie André-Obadia ◽  
Roland Peyron ◽  
Patrick Mertens ◽  
François Mauguière ◽  
Bernard Laurent ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Motor Cortex Stimulation ◽  
Double Blind

Deep Brain Stimulation and Motor Cortex Stimulation for Chronic Pain

2020 ◽  
Vol 68 (8) ◽  
pp. 235
Author(s):  
Patrick Senatus ◽  
Sarah Zurek ◽  
Milind Deogaonkar
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Motor Cortex Stimulation ◽  
Deep Brain

Results of motor cortex stimulation in the treatment of chronic pain syndromes

2015 ◽  
Vol 79 (6) ◽  
pp. 46 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. D. Isagulyan ◽  
A. A. Tomsky ◽  
A. V. Dekopov ◽  
E. M. Salova ◽  
E. M. Troshina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Motor Cortex Stimulation ◽  
Pain Syndromes ◽  
Chronic Pain Syndromes

Brain opioid receptor density predicts motor cortex stimulation efficacy for chronic pain

Pain ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 154 (11) ◽  
pp. 2563-2568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Maarrawi ◽  
Roland Peyron ◽  
Patrick Mertens ◽  
Nicolas Costes ◽  
Michel Magnin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Opioid Receptor ◽  
Receptor Density ◽  
Motor Cortex Stimulation

Extradural motor cortex stimulation for advanced Parkinson disease

2002 ◽  
Vol 97 (5) ◽  
pp. 1208-1211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Canavero ◽  
Riccardo Paolotti ◽  
Vincenzo Bonicalzi ◽  
Giancarlo Castellano ◽  
Stefania Greco-Crasto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Parkinson Disease ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Motor Cortex Stimulation ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedure ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgical ◽  
Cost Effective Alternative ◽  
Deep Brain

✓ Motor cortex stimulation is a minimally invasive surgical procedure used for pain control. The authors report their results treating two patients with typical Parkinson disease. Unilateral motor cortex stimulation proved to be beneficial bilaterally. Motor cortex stimulation may represent a cost-effective alternative to deep brain stimulation.

Motor Cortex Stimulation for Chronic Pain

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 693-698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Ostergard ◽  
Charles Munyon ◽  
Jonathan P. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Motor Cortex Stimulation

Chronic Motor Cortex Stimulation for Phantom Limb Pain Control: Correlations between Analgesic Effects and Cortex Mapping

Neurosurgery ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 413-413
Author(s):  
Yves Lazorthes ◽  
Jean-Christophe Sol ◽  
Pascal Cintas ◽  
Jean-Albert Lotterie ◽  
Jean-Claude Verdie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Phantom Limb Pain ◽  
Phantom Limb ◽  
Motor Cortex Stimulation ◽  
Limb Pain ◽  
Analgesic Effects

scholarly journals Intracranial Neurostimulation for Pain Control: A Review

2010 ◽  
Vol 2;13 (1;2) ◽  
pp. 157-165
Author(s):  
Timothy R. Deer
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Neuropathic Pain ◽  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Motor Cortex Stimulation ◽  
Failed Back Surgery ◽  
Deep Brain

Intracranial neurostimulation for pain relief is most frequently delivered by stimulating the motor cortex, the sensory thalamus, or the periaqueductal and periventricular gray matter. The stimulation of these sites through MCS (motor cortex stimulation) and DBS (deep brain stimulation) has proven effective for treating a number of neuropathic and nociceptive pain states that are not responsive or amenable to other therapies or types of neurostimulation. Prospective randomized clinical trials to confirm the efficacy of these intracranial therapies have not been published. Intracranial neurostimulation is somewhat different than other forms of neurostimulation in that its current primary application is for the treatment of medically intractable movement disorders. However, the increasing use of intracranial neurostimulation for the treatment of chronic pain, especially for pain not responsive to other neuromodulation techniques, reflects the efficacy and relative safety of these intracranial procedures. First employed in 1954, intracranial neurostimulation represents one of the earliest uses of neurostimulation to treat chronic pain that is refractory to medical therapy. Currently, 2 kinds of intracranial neurostimulation are commonly used to control pain: motor cortex stimulation and deep brain stimulation. MCS has shown particular promise in the treatment of trigeminal neuropathic pain and central pain syndromes such as thalamic pain syndrome. DBS may be employed for a number of nociceptive and neuropathic pain states, including cluster headaches, chronic low back pain, failed back surgery syndrome, peripheral neuropathic pain, facial deafferentation pain, and pain that is secondary to brachial plexus avulsion. The unique lack of stimulation-induced perceptual experience with MCS makes MCS uniquely suited for blinded studies of its effectiveness. This article will review the scientific rationale, indications, surgical techniques, and outcomes of intracranial neuromodulation procedures for the treatment of chronic pain. Key words: Motor cortex stimulation, deep brain stimulation, pain, neurostimulation

ID 416 – Motor cortex stimulation for chronic pain relief using repetitive magnetic stimulation (rTMS): 20 Hz versus Theta-Burst, which is better?

2016 ◽  
Vol 127 (3) ◽  
pp. e122-e123
Author(s):  
T.O.G. Lelekov-Boissard ◽  
E. Simon ◽  
C. Bradley ◽  
L. Garcia-Larrea ◽  
N. André-Obadia
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Cortex Stimulation ◽  
Repetitive Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Theta Burst
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document