On the lebesgue measure of the periodic points of a contact manifold

1995 ◽  
Vol 218 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vesselin Petkov ◽  
Georgi Popov
1993 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
Kanovei ◽  
Linton
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 801-814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sorin G. Gal

Abstract In this paper we introduce a new concept of Choquet-Stieltjes integral of f with respect to g on intervals, as a limit of Choquet integrals with respect to a capacity μ. For g(t) = t, one reduces to the usual Choquet integral and unlike the old known concept of Choquet-Stieltjes integral, for μ the Lebesgue measure, one reduces to the usual Riemann-Stieltjes integral. In the case of distorted Lebesgue measures, several properties of this new integral are obtained. As an application, the concept of Choquet line integral of second kind is introduced and some of its properties are obtained.


Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (13) ◽  
pp. 1546
Author(s):  
Mohsen Soltanifar

How many fractals exist in nature or the virtual world? In this paper, we partially answer the second question using Mandelbrot’s fundamental definition of fractals and their quantities of the Hausdorff dimension and Lebesgue measure. We prove the existence of aleph-two of virtual fractals with a Hausdorff dimension of a bi-variate function of them and the given Lebesgue measure. The question remains unanswered for other fractal dimensions.


1994 ◽  
Vol 101 (4) ◽  
pp. 318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph Walde ◽  
Paula Russo

Author(s):  
K. J. Falconer

Let H(μ, θ) be the hyperplane in Rn (n ≥ 2) that is perpendicular to the unit vector 6 and perpendicular distance μ from the origin; that is, H(μ, θ) = (x ∈ Rn: x. θ = μ). (Note that H(μ, θ) and H(−μ, −θ) are the same hyperplanes.) Let X be a proper compact convex subset of Rm. If f(x) ∈ L1(X) we will denote by F(μ, θ) the projection of f perpendicular to θ; that is, the integral of f(x) over H(μ, θ) with respect to (n − 1)-dimensional Lebesgue measure. By Fubini's Theorem, if f(x) ∈ L1(X), F(μ, θ) exists for almost all μ for every θ. Our aim in this paper is, given a finite collection of unit vectors θ1, …, θN, to characterize the F(μ, θi) that are the projections of some function f(x) with support in X for 1 ≤ i ≤ N.


2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. GLASNER ◽  
M. LEMAŃCZYK ◽  
B. WEISS

AbstractWe introduce a functor which associates to every measure-preserving system (X,ℬ,μ,T) a topological system $(C_2(\mu ),\tilde {T})$ defined on the space of twofold couplings of μ, called the topological lens of T. We show that often the topological lens ‘magnifies’ the basic measure dynamical properties of T in terms of the corresponding topological properties of $\tilde {T}$. Some of our main results are as follows: (i) T is weakly mixing if and only if $\tilde {T}$ is topologically transitive (if and only if it is topologically weakly mixing); (ii) T has zero entropy if and only if $\tilde {T}$ has zero topological entropy, and T has positive entropy if and only if $\tilde {T}$ has infinite topological entropy; (iii) for T a K-system, the topological lens is a P-system (i.e. it is topologically transitive and the set of periodic points is dense; such systems are also called chaotic in the sense of Devaney).


2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Péter Móra ◽  
Károly Simon ◽  
Boris Solomyak

1991 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-107
Author(s):  
Maxim R. Burke

AbstractWe investigate the cofinality of the partial order κ of functions from a regular cardinal κ into the ideal of Lebesgue measure zero subsets of R. We show that when add () = κ and the covering lemma holds with respect to an inner model of GCH, then cf (κ) = max{cf(κκ), cf([cf()]κ)}. We also give an example to show that the covering assumption cannot be removed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document