Vertical specialization and intra-industry trade: The role of factor endowments

2002 ◽  
Vol 138 (2) ◽  
pp. 340-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joan A. Martín-Montaner ◽  
Vicente Orts Ríos
Keyword(s):  
Vertical Specialization ◽  
Industry Trade ◽  
Factor Endowments

Book Reviews

2012 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 809-818
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Los Angeles ◽  
The United States ◽  
Factor Endowments ◽  
University Of Wisconsin ◽  
European Colonization ◽  
The University ◽  
Relative Differences

Jeffrey G. Williamson of Harvard University and University of Wisconsin reviews “Economic Development in the Americas since 1500: Endowments and Institutions” by Stanley L. Engerman and Kenneth L. Sokoloff. The EconLit abstract of the reviewed work begins: Eleven papers explore differences in the rates of economic growth in Latin America and mainland North America, specifically the United States and Canada, and consider how relative differences in growth over time are related to differences in the institutions that developed in different economies. Papers discuss paths of development -- an overview; factor endowments and institutions; the role of institutions in shaping factor endowments; the evolution of suffrage institutions; the evolution of schooling – 1800–1925; inequality and the evolution of taxation; land and immigration policies; politics and banking systems; five hundred years of European colonization; institutional and noninstitutional explanations of economic development; and institutions in political and economic development. Engerman is John H. Munro Professor of Economics and Professor of History at the University of Rochester. The late Sokoloff was Professor in the Department of Economics at the University of California, Los Angeles. Bibliography; index.

Accounting for China's Import Growth: A Structural Decomposition for 1997–2005

2011 ◽  
Vol 43 (12) ◽  
pp. 2971-2991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiansuo Pei ◽  
Erik Dietzenbacher ◽  
Jan Oosterhaven ◽  
Cuihong Yang
Keyword(s):  
Volume Growth ◽  
Decomposition Analysis ◽  
Final Demand ◽  
Global Supply Chain ◽  
Input Output ◽  
Vertical Specialization ◽  
Structural Decomposition Analysis ◽  
Structural Decomposition ◽  
China’S Growth

This paper applies structural decomposition analysis to Chinese input–output tables in order to disentangle and quantify the sources of China's import growth and China's growth in vertical specialization: that is, China's incorporation into the global supply chain. China's exports and the role of processing trade therein have increased substantially in the last decade. Yet, they account for only one third of China's import growth from 1997 to 2005. Instead, the volume growth of China's domestic final demand is found to be most important. Moreover, compared with other countries, the structural change in input–output coefficients and in the commodity composition of domestic final demand turns out to be surprisingly important. Looking only at vertical specialization, it is concluded that more than half of its growth, from 21% in 1997 to 30% in 2005, is due to the growth of China's import ratios.

The Role of Migration in the Variety and Quality of Trade: Evidence from Germany

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonella Bellino ◽  
Giuseppe Celi
Keyword(s):  
Consumer Goods ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Two Dimensions ◽  
Information Flows ◽  
Information Effect ◽  
Industry Trade ◽  
Migrant Communities ◽  
The Difference

AbstractWe explore the migration-trade nexus in the case of Germany over the period 2000-09, disentangling the two dimensions of intra-industry trade (vertical and horizontal). We find that immigration is positively and significantly related to intraindustry trade. However, the magnitude and statistical significance of migration’s impact on trade are considerably higher for horizontal intra-industry trade and increase with the difference in the level of development between Germany and the partner countries. This pattern is consistent with the view that information flows between migrant communities and their country of origin may be more important for consumer goods (where trade in varieties prevails) and that this information effect is more important if trading countries are very different.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document