scholarly journals Correction to: Mechanical Thrombectomy in Basilar Artery Occlusion

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 161-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Volker Maus ◽  
Alev Kalkan ◽  
Christoph Kabbasch ◽  
Nuran Abdullayev ◽  
Henning Stetefeld ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Basilar Artery ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Basilar Artery Occlusion

Basilar Artery Occlusion Chinese Endovascular Trial: Protocol for a prospective randomized controlled study

2021 ◽  
pp. 174749302110409
Author(s):  
Chuanhui Li ◽  
Chuanjie Wu ◽  
Longfei Wu ◽  
Wenbo Zhao ◽  
Jian Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sample Size ◽  
Basilar Artery ◽  
Symptom Onset ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Infarct Volume ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Basilar Artery Occlusion ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Rationale There are no randomized trials examining the best treatment for acute basilar artery occlusion in the 6–24-hour time window. Aims To assess the safety and efficacy of thrombectomy for stroke due to basilar artery occlusion in patients randomized within 6–24 h from symptom onset or time last seen well. Sample size For an estimated difference of 20% in proportions of the primary outcome between the two groups, 318 patients will be included for 5% significance and 90% power with a planned interim analysis after two-thirds of the sample size (212 patients) have achieved the 90 days follow-up. Methods and design A prospective, multi-center, randomized, controlled, open-label and blinded-endpoint trial. The randomization employs a 1:1 ratio of mechanical thrombectomy with the detachable Solitaire thrombectomy device and best medical therapy (BMT) vs. BMT alone. Study outcomes The primary outcome will be the proportion of patients achieving modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0–3 at 90 days. Key secondary outcomes are: dramatic early favorable response, dichotomized mRS score (0–2 vs. 3–6 and 0–4 vs. 5–6) at 90 days, ordinal (shift) mRS analysis at 90 days, infarct volume at 24 h, vessel recanalization at 24 h in both treatment arms, and successful recanalization in the thrombectomy arm according to the modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) classification defined as mTICI 2 b or 3. Safety variables are mortality at 90 days, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rates at 24 h, and procedure-related complications. Discussion Results from this trial will indicate whether mechanical thrombectomy is superior to medical management alone in achieving favorable outcomes in subjects with acute stroke caused by basilar artery occlusion presenting within 6–24 h from symptom onset. Trial registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02737189.

Abstract 1122‐000147: Factors associated with the Delayed Door to Puncture Time for the Basilar Artery Occlusion patient

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon Nguyen ◽  
Ichiro Yuki ◽  
Dana Stradling ◽  
Jordan C Xu ◽  
Kiarash Golshani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Basilar Artery ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Basilar Artery Occlusion ◽  
P Value ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Delayed Initiation

Introduction : Performing mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with basilar artery occlusion (BAO) is currently not evidence‐based. In the real‐world practice, it is also often encountered that the delayed initiation of the MT happens for this particular patient groups due to lack of cortical signs and other medical confounding factors. Methods : We retrospectively analyzed the angiographical and clinical outcomes of consecutive BAO patient who underwent MT in single institution. Onset to treatment (OTT), Door to Puncture (DTP) time were compared with those in anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (ACLVO) group who underwent MT in the same time period. For those showed significantly longer DTP time, the factors associated with the delayed initiation of the MT were analyzed. Results : A total of 271 patients underwent mechanical thrombectomy at UCI Medical Center between Jan 2016 and June 2021. Of these, 32 patients diagnosed as BAO by CTA and underwent MT were included in the study. Successful recanalization was achieved in 28 cases (87.5%), and symptomatic ICH occurred in 3 cases (9.4%). Nine patients (28.1%) showed good clinical outcomes (mRS 0–3) at 3 months. The median Onset to Puncture Time (OTT) was 340 min. The median DTP time (145 min) was significantly longer as compared to the ACLVO patients (99 min) (p value = 0.04). Of the 6 patients who showed significant delay in the initiation of intervention (DTP>300 min), 5 patients (83.3%) did not have the initial “stroke‐code activation” at the time of ED arrival. The cause of the delay was due to lack of cortical sign (3), bilateral spontaneous sustained clonus, which misinterpreted as seizure (1), AMS with non‐focal neurological signs interpreted as encephalopathy (2). Conclusions : DTP of the patients who underwent MT for BAO was significantly longer than that in ACLAO. Lack of cortical sings which are markers of ACLVO were associated with delayed activation of stroke code. Establishment of BAO screening in the ED assessment and prompt activation of Stroke code may contribute to the improvement of MT treatment for the BAO patients.

Endovascular treatment for acute basilar artery occlusion: descriptive analysis of the experience in a comprehensive stroke centre

2021 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
General Anaesthesia ◽  
Basilar Artery ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Basilar Artery Occlusion ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Epidemiological Characteristics

Objectives: To describe the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of patients with basilar artery occlusion (BAO) treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in Aragón, and to compare its anaesthetic management, technical effectivity, security, and prognosis with those of anterior circulation. Methods: 322 patients from the prospective registry of mechanical thrombectomies from Aragon were assessed: 29 with BAO and 293 with an anterior circulation large vessel occlusion. Baseline characteristics, procedural, clinical and safety outcomes variables were compared. Results: Out of 29 patients with BAO that underwent endovascular therapy (62.1% men; average age 69.8 ± 14.05 years) 18 (62.1%) received endovascular therapy (EVT) alone and 11 (37.9%) EVT plus intravenous thrombolysis. Atherothrombotic stroke was the most common etiology (41%). The BAO group had longer Door-to-groin (160 vs 141 min; P = 0.043) and Onset-to-reperfusion times (340 vs 297 min; P = 0.005), and higher use of general anaesthesia (60.7% vs 14.7%; P < 0.01). No statistically significant difference was found for Procedure time (60 vs 50 min; P = 0.231) nor the rate of successful recanalization (72.4% vs 82.7%; P = 0.171). Functional independence at 90 days was significantly worse in the BAO group (17.9% vs 38.2%; P < 0.01). Conclusions: Patients with basilar artery occlusion had higher morbimortality despite similar angiographic results. Mechanical thrombectomy for BAOs is a safe and effective procedure in selected patients. A consensus about the effect of anaesthesia has yet to be reached, for BAO general anaesthesia remains the most frequently used technique.

scholarly journals Effect of manual aspiration thrombectomy using large-bore aspiration catheter for acute basilar artery occlusion: comparison with a stent retriever system

BMC Neurology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Wook Choi ◽  
Miran Han ◽  
Jung Hyun Park ◽  
Woo Sang Jung
Keyword(s):  
Basilar Artery ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Treatment Method ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Basilar Artery Occlusion ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
First Line ◽  
Aspiration Thrombectomy ◽  
First Pass ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Background A large-bore aspiration catheter can be employed for recanalization of acute basilar artery occlusion. Here we compare the results of mechanical thrombectomy using a stent retriever (SR) and manual aspiration thrombectomy (MAT) using a large-bore aspiration catheter system as a first-line recanalization method in acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO). Methods The records of 50 patients with acute BAO who underwent mechanical thrombectomy were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were assigned to one of two groups based on the first-line recanalization method. The treatment and clinical outcomes were compared. Results Sixteen (32%) patients were treated with MAT with a large-bore aspiration catheter and 34 (68%) with a SR as the first-line treatment method. The MAT group had a shorter procedure time (28 vs. 65 min; p = 0.001), higher rate of first-pass recanalization (68.8% vs. 38.2%, p = 0.044), and lower median number of passes (1 vs 2; p = 0.008) when compared with the SR group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of any hemorrhagic complication (6.3% vs. 8.8%; p = 0.754) between the groups. However, there were four cases of procedure-related subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) in the SR group and one death occurred due to massive hemorrhage. Conclusions Selection of MAT using a large-bore aspiration catheter for acute BAO may be a safe and effective first-line treatment method with higher first-pass recanalization rate and shorter procedure time than SR.

Mechanical thrombectomy with the Solitaire device in acute basilar artery occlusion

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 200-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabelle Mourand ◽  
Paolo Machi ◽  
Didier Milhaud ◽  
Marie-Christine Picot ◽  
Kyriakos Lobotesis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Basilar Artery ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Basilar Artery Occlusion

scholarly journals Mechanical thrombectomy for basilar artery occlusion: efficacy, outcomes, and futile recanalization in comparison with the anterior circulation

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 1174-1180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Raphael Meinel ◽  
Johannes Kaesmacher ◽  
Panagiotis Chaloulos-Iakovidis ◽  
Leonidas Panos ◽  
Pasquale Mordasini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Basilar Artery ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Favorable Outcome ◽  
Basilar Artery Occlusion ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Stroke Severity ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Significant Difference

BackgroundPerforming mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with basilar artery occlusion (BAO) is currently not evidence-based.ObjectiveTo compare patients’ outcome, relative merits of achieving recanalization, and predictors of futile recanalization (FR) between BAO and anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (ACLVO) MT.MethodsIn the multicenter BEYOND-SWIFT registry (NCT03496064), univariate and multivariate (displayed as adjusted Odds Ratios, aOR and 95% confidence intervals, 95%-CI) outcome comparisons between BAO (N=165) and ACLVO (N=1574) were performed. The primary outcome was favorable outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale, mRS 0-2). Secondary outcome included mortality, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and FR. The relative merits of achieving successful recanalization between ACLVO and BAO were evaluated with interaction terms.ResultsMT in BAO was more often technically effective and equally safe in regards to mortality and sICH when compared to ACLVO. When adjusting for baseline differences, there was no significant difference between BAO vs ACLVO regarding rates of favorable outcome (aOR 0.986, 95%-CI 0.553 – 1.758). However, BAO were associated with increased rates of FR (aOR 2.146, 95%-CI 1.267 – 3.633). Predictors for FR were age, stroke severity, maneuver count and intracranial stenting. No significant heterogeneity on the relative merits of achieving successful recanalization on several outcome parameters were observed when comparing BAO and ACLVO.ConclusionsIn selected patients, similar outcomes can be achieved in BAO and ACLVO patients treated with MT. Randomized controlled trials comparing patient selection and interventional strategies seem warranted to avoid FR.Trial registration numberNCT03496064

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document