scholarly journals Comparison of efficacy and safety between simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy and standard-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wang Lan ◽  
Liu Lihong ◽  
Han Chun ◽  
Liu Shutang ◽  
Wang Qi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Survival Duration ◽  
Intensity Modulated ◽  
Integrated Boost ◽  
Experienced Grade

Abstract Objective This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) versus standard-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SD-IMRT) in the treatment of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Methods From July 2003 to March 2014, 1748 patients in a single center who received definitive chemoradiotherapy were included in the analysis. A total of 109 patients who underwent SIB-IMRT and fulfilled all inclusion and exclusion criteria were identified as the study group. A total of 266 patients who underwent SD-IMRT (60 Gy/30 fractions, 2 Gy/fraction, 1 time/day, 5 times/week) during the same period were selected as the control group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the baseline characteristics. Survival status, treatment failure mode, and the occurrence of adverse events were compared between the two groups. Results There were more women and more cervical and upper thoracic cancers (P = 0.038, < 0.001, respectively) in the SIB-IMRT group before case matching. The median progression-free survival (PFS) in the SD-IMRT and SIB-IMRT groups was 22 and 19 months, respectively, and the median overall survival duration was 24 and 22 months, respectively, with χ2 = 0.244 and P = 0.621. After PSM of 1:1, 138 patients entered the final analysis (69 cases from each group). The median PFS of the SD-IMRT group and the SIB-IMRT group was 13 and 18 months, respectively, with χ2 = 8.776 and P = 0.003. The 1‑, 3‑, and 5‑year overall survival rates were 66.7, 21.7, and 8.7% and 65.2, 36.2, and 27.3%, respectively, and the median overall survival duration was 16 and 22 months, respectively, with χ2 = 5.362 and P = 0.021. Treatment failure mode: 5‑year local regional recurrence rates of SD-IMRT and SIB-IMRT were 50.7 and 36.2%, respectively, with χ2 = 2.949 and P = 0.086. The 5‑year distant metastasis rates of the two groups were 36.2 and 24.6%, respectively, with χ2 = 2.190 and P = 0.139. Adverse events: 3 patients experienced grade 4–5 toxicity (2.2%), including one case of grade 4 radiation esophagitis and two cases of grade 5 radiation pneumonitis, all in the SD-IMRT group; 14 patients experienced grade 3 adverse events (10.1%), primarily including radiation esophagitis, radiation pneumonitis, and hematological toxicity. Conclusion The technique of SIB-IMRT was safe and reliable compared with SD-IMRT. In addition, SIB-IMRT had locoregional control advantages and potential survival benefits.

Concurrent high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy and chemotherapy for unresectable locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer: a pilot study

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Kenichi Matsumoto ◽  
Akihiko Miyamoto ◽  
Tomoya Kawase ◽  
Taro Murai ◽  
Yuta Shibamoto
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Concurrent Chemotherapy ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Chemotherapy Group ◽  
Intensity Modulated

Abstract Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of concurrent chemotherapy and high-dose (≥55 Gy) intensity-modulated radiotherapy (CCIMRT) in comparison with chemotherapy alone and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) alone for unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Methods: Forty-six patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing CCIMRT (n = 17), chemotherapy alone (n = 16) or IMRT alone (n = 13) were analysed. Overall survival (OS), locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS) and gastrointestinal toxicities were evaluated. The median radiation dose was 60 Gy (range, 55–60) delivered in a median of 25 fractions (range, 24–30). Gemcitabine (GEM) alone, GEM + S-1, S-1 alone, FOLFIRINOX and GEM + nab-paclitaxel were used in CCIMRT and chemo-monotherapy. Results: The 1-year OS rate was 69% in the CCIMRT group, 27% in the chemotherapy group and 38% in the IMRT group (p = 0·12). The 1-year LRPFS rate was 73, 0 and 40% in the 3 groups, respectively (p = 0·012). Acute Grade ≥ 2 gastrointestinal toxicity (nausea, diarrhea) was observed in 12% (2/17) in the CCIMRT group, 25% (4/16) in the chemotherapy group and 7·7% (1/13) in the IMRT group (p = 0·38). Late Grade 3 gastrointestinal bleeding was observed in 6·3% (1/16) in the chemotherapy group. Conclusion: High-dose CCIMRT yielded acceptable toxicity and favorable OS and LRPFS.

scholarly journals Single-Institute Clinical Experiences Using Whole-Field Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Sequential IMRT in Postoperative Patients With Oral Cavity Cancer (OCC)

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 107327482090470
Author(s):  
Chen-Hsi Hsieh ◽  
Pei-Wei Shueng ◽  
Li-Ying Wang ◽  
Li-Jen Liao ◽  
Wu-Chia Lo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oral Cavity ◽  
Oral Cavity Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy ◽  
Simultaneous Integrated Boost ◽  
Clinical Experiences ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Intensity Modulated ◽  
Integrated Boost ◽  
Sequential Technique

This study aimed to review clinical experiences using whole-field simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and sequential IMRT in postoperative patients with oral cavity cancer (OCC). From November 2006 to December 2014, a total of 182 postoperative patients with OCC who underwent either SIB-IMRT (n = 63) or sequential IMRT (n = 119) were enrolled retrospectively and matched randomly according to multiple risk factors by a computer. The differences were well balanced after patient matching ( P = .38). The median follow-up time was 65 months. For patients treated with the SIB technique and the sequential technique, the respective mortality rates were 36.8% and 20.0% ( P = .04). The primary recurrence rates were 26.3% and 10.0% ( P = .02), respectively. The respective marginal failure rates were 26.7% and 16.7%. A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that patients who received the SIB technique had a 2.74 times higher risk of death than those who received the sequential technique (95% confidence interval = 1.10-6.79, P = .03). Sequential IMRT provided a significantly lower dose to the esophagus (5.2 Gy, P = .02) and trachea (4.6 Gy, P = .03) than SIB-IMRT. For patients with locally advanced OCC, postoperative sequential IMRT may overcome an unpredictable geographic miss, potentially with a lower marginal failure rate in the primary area. Patients treated by sequential IMRT show equal overall survival benefits to those treated by SIB-IMRT and a lower mortality rate than those treated by SIB-IMRT. Additionally, a reduced dose to the esophagus and trachea compared to sequential IMRT was noted.

scholarly journals Moderately Hypofractionated Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) With a Simultaneous Integrated Boost for Locally Advanced Head and Cancer – Do Modern Techniques Held Their Promise?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jörn Wichmann ◽  
Martin Durisin ◽  
Robert Michael Hermann ◽  
Roland Merten ◽  
Hans Christiansen
Keyword(s):  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy ◽  
Simultaneous Integrated Boost ◽  
Advanced Head ◽  
Intensity Modulated ◽  
Regional Control ◽  
Integrated Boost ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Abstract PurposeIntensity-modulated-radiotherapy (IMRT) is still a standard of care for radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer (LA-HNSCC). Simultaneous-integrated-boost (SIB) and moderately hypofractionation offer an opportunity of individual dose painting and reduction of overall treatment time. We present retrospective data on toxicity and local-regional-control of a patient cohort with LA-HNSCC treated with an IMRT-SIB-concept in comparison to normofractionated 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-RT) after a long-term follow-up.MethodsBetween 2012 and 2014, n=67 patients with HNSCC (stages III/IV without distant metastases) were treated with IMRT-SIB either definitive (single/total doses: 2.2/66Gy, 2.08/62.4Gy, 1.8/54Gy in 30 fractions) or in the postoperative setting (2.08/62.4Gy, 1.92/57.6Gy, 1.8/54Gy). These patients' clinical course was matched (for gender, primary, and treatment concept) as part of a matched-pair-analysis with patients treated before mid-2012 with normofractionated 3D-CRT (definitive: 2Gy/50Gy followed by a sequential boost up to 70Gy; postoperative: 2Gy/60-64Gy). Chemotherapy/immunotherapy was given concomitantly in both groups in the definitive situation (postoperative dependent on risk factors). Primary endpoints were acute and late toxicity; secondary endpoint was loco-regional-control (LRC).Results67 patients treated with IMRT-SIB (n = 20 definitive, n = 47 adjuvant) were matched with 67 patients treated with 3D-RT. There were minor imbalances between the groups concerning non-matching-variables like extracapsular extension (ECE) and chemotherapy in IMRT-SIB.Significantly less toxicity was found in favor of IMRT-SIB concerning dysphagia, radiation dermatitis, xerostomia, fibrosis, and lymphoedema. After a median follow-up of 63 months, median LRC was not reached (IMRT-SIB) vs. 69.5m (3D-RT) (p=0.63).ConclusionThis moderately hypofractionated IMRT-SIB-concept showed to be feasible with less toxicity compared to conventional 3D-RT in this long-term follow-up observation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document