Return to sports after arthroscopic capsulolabral repair using knotless suture anchors for anterior shoulder instability in soccer players: minimum 5-year follow-up study

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 440-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduard Alentorn-Geli ◽  
Pedro Álvarez-Díaz ◽  
Jesús Doblas ◽  
Gilbert Steinbacher ◽  
Roberto Seijas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Instability ◽  
Soccer Players ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Instability ◽  
Return To Sports ◽  
Suture Anchors ◽  
Follow Up Study

scholarly journals MEAN 6 YEAR CLINICAL OUTCOMES, SURVIVORSHIP, AND RETURN TO SPORTS AFTER ARTHROSCOPIC CAPSULAR REPAIR WITH SUTURE ANCHORS FOR ADOLESCENT MULTIDIRECTIONAL SHOULDER INSTABILITY

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0002
Author(s):  
Brendon C. Mitchell ◽  
Matthew Y. Siow ◽  
Alyssa Carrol ◽  
Andrew T. Pennock ◽  
Eric W. Edmonds
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Shoulder Instability ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Demographic Variables ◽  
Return To Sports ◽  
Suture Anchors ◽  
Surgical Failure

Background: Multidirectional shoulder instability (MDI) refractory to rehabilitation can be treated with arthroscopic capsulolabral reconstruction with suture anchors. No studies have reported on outcomes or examined the risk factors that may contribute to poor outcomes in adolescent athletes. Hypothesis/Purpose: To identify risk factors for surgical failure by comparing anatomic, clinical, and demographic variables in adolescents who underwent surgical intervention for MDI. Methods: All patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery at one institution between January 2009 and April 2017 were reviewed. Patients >20 years old at presentation were excluded. Multidirectional instability was defined by positive drive-through sign on arthroscopy plus positive sulcus sign and/or multidirectional laxity on anterior and posterior drawer testing while under anesthesia. Two-year minimum follow-up was required, but those whose treatment failed earlier were included for reporting purposes. Demographics and intraoperative findings were recorded, as were Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scoring, Pediatric and Adolescent Shoulder Survey (PASS), and the short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) results. Results: Eighty adolescents (88 shoulders) were identified for having undergone surgical treatment of MDI. Of these 80 patients, 42 (50 shoulders; 31 female, 19 male) were available at a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Mean follow-up was 6.3 years (range, 2.8-10.2 years). Thirteen (26.0%) shoulders experienced surgical failure defined by recurrence of subluxation and instability, all of which underwent re-operation. Time to re-operation occurred at a mean of 1.9 years (range, 0.8-3.2). Our cohort had an overall survivorship of 96% at 1 year after surgery and 76% at 3 years. None of the anatomic, clinical, or demographic variables tested, or the presence of generalized ligamentous laxity, were correlated with subjective outcomes or re-operation. Number of anchors used was not different between those that failed and those that did not fail. Patients reported a mean SANE score of 83.3, PASS score of 85.0, and QuickDASH score of 6.8. Return to prior level of sport (RTS) occurred in 56% of patients. Conclusion: Multidirectional shoulder instability is a complex disorder that can be challenging to treat. Adolescent MDI that is refractory to non-surgical management appears to have long-term outcomes after surgical intervention that are comparable to adolescent patients with unidirectional instability. In patients who do experience failure of capsulorraphy, we show that failure will most likely occur within 3 years of the index surgical treatment. [Table: see text][Figure: see text]

Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability: a 24-year follow-up study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudio Chillemi ◽  
Mario Guerrisi ◽  
Carlo Paglialunga ◽  
Francesco Salate Santone ◽  
Marcello Osimani
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Instability ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Instability ◽  
Latarjet Procedure ◽  
Follow Up Study

scholarly journals Functional outcome of arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability based on suture anchor configuration

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 301
Author(s):  
Madan Ballal ◽  
Tarun Jayakumar
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Shoulder Instability ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Functional Improvement ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Instability ◽  
Suture Anchors ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Functional Scores

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> The objective of the study was to evaluate the functional outcome of arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability to assess whether the number and position of suture anchors plays a role in determining the functional outcome.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> This was a prospective study on 32 patients operated with arthroscopic Bankart repair between December 2017 to April 2019. Pre-op and regular follow-up scores were measured at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months post-op using Rowe score and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score to assess functional outcome.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Mean age of the study group was 24.5±6.9 years. Functional outcome as determined by Rowe score and ASES score at 6 months follow-up were found to be 90.5±7.2 and 85.9±14.1 respectively when compared to the pre-op scores of 23.2±8.2 and 47.9±5.7 respectively; all of which showed highly significant functional improvement with highly significant reduction in visual analog scale (VAS) pain score. Patients had no recurrent dislocations with mean external rotation limitation of 5<sup>o</sup>. 25 (78.1%) patients had two suture anchors inserted and 7 (21.9%) patients had multiple (&gt;2) anchors; and when analysis was done, there was no statistically significant difference between number of suture anchors used with respect to the functional scores.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> We conclude that arthroscopic Bankart repair is a useful and successful procedure. Patient identification and selection remains the key in determining the success of repair. Meticulous surgical technique and correct positioning of suture anchors may help in reducing the number of anchors without compromising on the final functional outcome, thereby reducing the economic burden on patients.</p>

scholarly journals Outcomes of arthroscopic capsulolabral reconstruction for anterior instability with greater than 20% glenoid bone defects: are Latarjet procedures absolutely indicated for these patients?

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 62-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sae Hoon Kim ◽  
Whanik Jung ◽  
Sung-Min Rhee ◽  
Ji Un Kim ◽  
Joo Han Oh
Keyword(s):  
Bone Defect ◽  
Shoulder Instability ◽  
Bone Defects ◽  
Defect Size ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Instability ◽  
Return To Sports ◽  
Anterior Instability ◽  
Recurrent Instability ◽  
Capsulolabral Reconstruction

Background: Recent studies have reported high rates of recurrence of shoulder instability in patients with glenoid bone defects greater than 20% after capsulolabral reconstruction. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the failure rate of arthroscopic capsulolabral reconstruction for the treatment of anterior instability in the presence of glenoid bone deficits >20%. Methods: Retrospective analyses were conducted among cases with anterior shoulder instability and glenoid bone defects of >20% that were treated by arthroscopic capsulolabral reconstruction with a minimum 2-year follow-up (30 cases). We included the following variables: age, bone defect size, instability severity index score (ISIS), on-/off-track assessment, incidence recurrent instability, and return to sports. Results: The mean glenoid bone defect size was 25.8% ± 4.2% (range, 20.4%–37.2%), and 18 cases (60%) had defects of >25%. Bony Bankart lesions were identified in 11 cases (36.7%). Eleven cases (36.7%) had ISIS scores >6 points and 21 cases (70%) had off-track lesions. No cases of recurrent instability were identified over a mean follow-up of 39.9 months (range, 24–86 months), but a sense of subluxation was reported by three patients. Return to sports at the preinjury level was possible in 24 cases (80%), and the average satisfaction rating was 92%. Conclusions: Arthroscopic soft tissue reconstruction was successful for treating anterior shoulder instability among patients with glenoid bone defects >20%, even enabling return to sports. Future studies should focus on determining the range of bone defect sizes that can be successfully managed by soft tissue repair.

scholarly journals A Multicenter Retrospective Study With a Minimum 5-Year Follow-up Comparing Arthroscopic Bankart Repair and the Latarjet Procedure

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 232596712094136
Author(s):  
Eran Maman ◽  
Oleg Dolkart ◽  
Rafael Krespi ◽  
Assaf Kadar ◽  
Gabriel Mozes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Instability ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Instability ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Return To Sports ◽  
Latarjet Procedure ◽  
Recurrent Instability ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair ◽  
Functional Scores

Background: Arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) and the Latarjet procedure are surgical techniques commonly used to treat anterior shoulder instability. There is no consensus among shoulder surgeons regarding the indications for choosing one over the other. Purpose: To compare the results of the Latarjet procedure with those of ABR for the treatment of anterior shoulder instability. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Data on all patients who were treated surgically for recurrent anterior shoulder instability between 2006 and 2011 were retrospectively collected at 4 medical centers. The minimum follow-up was 5 years. Data were retrieved from medical charts, and patients were interviewed to assess their level of satisfaction (range, 0-100), functional outcomes (using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score; the Subjective Shoulder Value; and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score), and quality of life (using the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey [SF-12]). Information on return to sports activities and postoperative level of activity compared with that of the preinjury state, complications, reoperations, and recurrent instability were recorded and evaluated. Results: A total of 242 patients were included. The Latarjet procedure was performed in 27 shoulders, and ABR was performed in 215 shoulders. Patients in the ABR group had significantly higher rates of redislocation (18.5%; P = .05) and subluxation (21.4%; P = .43) but a lower rate of self-reported apprehension (43.0%; P = .05) compared with patients in the Latarjet group (3.7%, 14.8%, and 63.0%, respectively). There were 5 patients in the ABR group who underwent reoperation with the Latarjet procedure because of recurrent instability. The functional scores in the Latarjet group were better than those in the ABR group. The SF-12 physical score was significantly better in the Latarjet group than in the ABR group (98.1 vs 93.9, respectively; P = .01). Patient satisfaction and subjective scores were similar in both groups. Conclusion: These results support recently published data on the Latarjet procedure that showed its superiority over ABR in midterm stability (dislocations or subluxations). The contribution of self-reported apprehension to the broad definition of stability is not clear, and apprehension rates were not correlated with satisfaction scores or the recurrence of dislocation or subluxation.

scholarly journals Risk Factors for Recurrence of Shoulder Instability after Bankart Lesion Arthroscopic Treatment

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 20-25
Author(s):  
E. A Belyak ◽  
A. A Kubashev ◽  
F. L Lazko ◽  
M. A Abdulkhabirov ◽  
K. A Ptitsyn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Shoulder Instability ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Instability ◽  
Suture Anchors ◽  
Treatment Results ◽  
Recurrent Instability ◽  
Sports Activity ◽  
Risk Factors For Recurrence ◽  
High Level

Analysis of treatment results for 408 patients (17-48 years old) with posttraumatic anterior shoulder instability was performed. In all cases arthroscopic Bankart repair with the use of suture anchors was performed from 1997 to 2013. Follow up period made up 5.7±1.2 years. Recurrent instability was observed in 45 (11%) patients. Comparison of patients with and without recurrent shoulder instability enabled to identify the following risk factors: high-level of sports activity (78.0% vs 27,8%, p

Outcomes of the Latarjet Procedure Versus Free Bone Block Procedures for Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 036354652092583
Author(s):  
Ron Gilat ◽  
Eric D. Haunschild ◽  
Ophelie Z. Lavoie-Gagne ◽  
Tracy M. Tauro ◽  
Derrick M. Knapik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Shoulder Instability ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Instability ◽  
Bone Block ◽  
Return To Sports ◽  
Latarjet Procedure ◽  
Shoulder Stabilization ◽  
Recurrent Instability

Background: Free bone block (FBB) procedures for anterior shoulder instability have been proposed as an alternative to or bail-out for the Latarjet procedure. However, studies comparing the outcomes of these treatment modalities are limited. Purpose: To systematically review and perform a meta-analysis comparing the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing anterior shoulder stabilization with a Latarjet or FBB procedure. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched from inception to 2019 for human-participants studies published in the English language. The search was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement including studies reporting clinical outcomes of patients undergoing Latarjet or FBB procedures for anterior shoulder instability with minimum 2-year follow-up. Case reports and technique articles were excluded. Data were synthesized, and a random effects meta-analysis was performed to determine the proportions of recurrent instability, other complications, progression of osteoarthritis, return to sports, and patient-reported outcome (PRO) improvement. Results: A total of 2007 studies were screened; of these, 70 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. These studies reported outcomes on a total of 4540 shoulders, of which 3917 were treated with a Latarjet procedure and 623 were treated with an FBB stabilization procedure. Weighted mean follow-up was 75.8 months (range, 24-420 months) for the Latarjet group and 92.3 months (range, 24-444 months) for the FBB group. No significant differences were found between the Latarjet and the FBB groups in the overall random pooled summary estimate of the rate of recurrent instability (5% vs 3%, respectively; P = .09), other complications (4% vs 5%, respectively; P = .892), progression of osteoarthritis (12% vs 4%, respectively; P = .077), and return to sports (73% vs 88%; respectively, P = .066). American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores improved after both Latarjet and FBB, with a significantly greater increase after FBB procedures (10.44 for Latarjet vs 32.86 for FBB; P = .006). Other recorded PRO scores improved in all studies, with no significant difference between groups. Conclusion: Current evidence supports the safety and efficacy of both the Latarjet and FBB procedures for anterior shoulder stabilization in the presence of glenoid bone loss. We found no significant differences between the procedures in rates of recurrent instability, other complications, osteoarthritis progression, and return to sports. Significant improvement in PROs was demonstrated for both groups. Significant heterogeneity existed between studies on outcomes of the Latarjet and FBB procedures, warranting future high-quality, comparative studies.

scholarly journals LATARJET PROCEDURE ON ANTERIOR SHOULDER INSTABILITY IN PROFESSIONAL SOCCER PLAYERS

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 84-87
Author(s):  
GUILHERME AUGUSTO STIRMA ◽  
EWERTON BORGES DE SOUZA LIMA ◽  
DEGINALDO HOLANDA CHAVES ◽  
PAULO SANTORO BELANGERO ◽  
CARLOS VICENTE ANDREOLI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Instability ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Physical Contact ◽  
Soccer Players ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Instability ◽  
Return To Sports ◽  
Latarjet Procedure ◽  
Glenohumeral Instability ◽  
Professional Soccer ◽  
The Mean

ABSTRACT Anterior glenohumeral instability is a frequent cause of professional soccer players’ removal, reduced performance, and prolonged recovery. Players are subjected to intense physical contact and high performance, thus demanding lower rates of recurrence after surgical correction so they can return to sport quickly. Objective: To assess professional soccer players treated by the Lartajet technique considering the rate and time of return to sports activities, complications or failures. Methods: Analysis held between 2010 and 2018 of professional soccer players diagnosed with anterior shoulder instability operated by the open procedure of Lartajet in our service. Results: The mean return to professional sports was 93.5 days. The mean time of surgery in relation to the first dislocation was 12.4 months. Each athlete had 4.3 shoulder dislocations until the procedure was performed. The rate of recurrence was zero and subluxation was not observed. Conclusion: The Latarjet procedure allowed all professional athletes to return to competitive activities quickly, without dislocations and subluxation, negative seizure and without complications during follow-up. Level of evidence IV, Case series.

scholarly journals Patient Outcomes and Fear of Returning to Sports After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Remplissage

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 232596712110017
Author(s):  
Sijia Feng ◽  
Mo Chen ◽  
Jun Chen ◽  
Hong Li ◽  
Jiwu Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Shoulder Instability ◽  
Shoulder Function ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Instability ◽  
Return To Sports ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair ◽  
Group B

Background: Although Bankart repair with remplissage is commonly performed to treat anterior shoulder instability, there is limited information on specific outcomes or patients’ fears regarding return to sports (RTS). Purpose: To study recurrence rates, pain, shoulder function, active range of motion (ROM), RTS rate, and patients’ fears and expectations for RTS after arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage for anterior shoulder instability. We compared these outcomes with those after Bankart repair alone. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was carried out between 2007 and 2017 among patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage (group BR) and Bankart repair alone (group B). At the final follow-up, outcomes including recurrence, pain, shoulder function, active ROM, RTS rate, and fear toward RTS were assessed. The specific outcomes for RTS were evaluated based on 3 levels: return to normal life, RTS at any level (RTSA), and RTS at previous level (RTSP). Results: A total of 70 patients were included (29 in group BR and 41 in group B) with a mean 67.2 months of follow-up. Group BR demonstrated a significantly lower recurrence rate than did group B (0 vs 22.0%, respectively; P = .007) as well as higher postoperative Rowe score (92.8 ± 7.1 vs 83.3 ± 16.2, respectively; P = .005). There were no differences between the groups in postoperative visual analog scale for pain score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Oxford Shoulder Instability Score, or active ROM. The rates of RTSA (100% vs 84.2%; P = .03) and RTSP (77.8% vs 50.0%; P = .02) were higher in group BR than in group B, respectively, and significantly fewer patients in group BR reported fear of RTS (40.7% vs 63.2%; P = .04). Conclusion: In this study, recurrence rate, pain, shoulder function, active ROM, and RTS rate were satisfactory after arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage. Patients who underwent this procedure reported less fear toward RTS and higher rates of RTSA and RTSP than did those who undergo Bankart repair alone.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document