Shoulder, hip, and knee arthrography needle placement using fluoroscopic guidance: practice patterns of musculoskeletal radiologists in North America

2009 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 377-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Conor P. Shortt ◽  
William B. Morrison ◽  
Catherine C. Roberts ◽  
Diane M. Deely ◽  
Angela G. Gopez ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew S. Young ◽  
Michael W. Fischer ◽  
Nicholas S. Lang ◽  
Matthew R. Cooke

This study provides trends in the discipline of dental anesthesiology. A questionnaire-based survey was sent to 338 members of the American Society of Dentist Anesthesiologists to evaluate practice patterns. One focus of the study was modality of sedation/anesthesia used for dentistry in North America. Age, gender, years in practice, and geographic region of practice were also obtained. Data gathered from the returned questionnaires were entered into an Excel spreadsheet and then imported into JMP Statistical Discovery Software (v12.2 Pro) for descriptive analysis. A total of 112 surveys were completed electronically and 102 surveys were returned via post, for a total response rate of 63.3% (N = 214). Data from this survey suggested a wide variation of therapeutic practices among dentist anesthesiologists in North America. Of the surveyed dentist anesthesiologists, 58.7% (SE = 4.2%) practice as mobile providers, 32.2% (SE = 3.1%) provide care in an academic environment, and 27.7% (SE = 2.8%) function as operator/anesthetists. The majority of anesthesia is provided for pediatric dentistry (47.0%, SE = 4.2%), oral and maxillofacial surgery (18.5%, SE = 3.9%), and special needs (16.7%, SE = 3.6%). Open-airway (58.7%, SE = 5.5%) sedation/anesthesia was the preferred modality of delivery, compared with the use of advanced airway (41.3%, SE = 4.6%). The demographics show diverse practice patterns of dentist anesthesiologists in multiple regions of the continent. Despite concerns regarding specialty recognition, reimbursement difficulties, and competition from alternative anesthesia providers, the overall perceptions of dentist anesthesiologists and the future of the field seem largely favorable.


Mitochondrion ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 26-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumit Parikh ◽  
Amy Goldstein ◽  
Mary Kay Koenig ◽  
Fernando Scaglia ◽  
Gregory M Enns ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 150 (4) ◽  
pp. S589
Author(s):  
Peter Church ◽  
Jeffrey S. Hyams ◽  
Frank Ruemmele ◽  
LIssy de Ridder ◽  
Dan Turner ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 3;11 (5;3) ◽  
pp. 327-331
Author(s):  
Peter Gonzalez

Of patients presenting to pain clinics, complaints are of low back or buttock pain with or without radicular leg symptoms is one of the most common. Piriformis syndrome may be a contributor in up to 8% of these patients. The mainstay of treatment is conservative management with physical therapy, anti-inflammatory medications, muscle relaxants, and correction of biomechanical abnormalities. However, in recalcitrant cases, a piriformis injection of anesthetic and/or corticosteroids may be considered. Because of its small size, proximity to neurovascular structures, and deep location, the piriformis muscle is often injected with the use of commuted tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound (US), fluoroscopy, electrical stimulators, or electromyography (EMG). Numerous techniques have been proposed using one or a combination of the above modalities. However, application of these techniques is limited by unavailability of CT, MRI, and EMG equipment as well as a paucity of trained physicians in US-guided procedures in many pain treatment centers throughout the United States. Fluoroscopy, however, is more widely available in this setting. This study utilized a cadaveric specimen to confirm proper needle placement for piriformis or peri-sciatic injection utilizing the previously documented landmarks for fluoroscopic guidance as described by Betts. An anteroposterior of the pelvis with inclusion of the acetabular region of the hip and the inferior aspect of the sacroiliac joint was obtained. The most superior-lateral aspect of the acetabulum and the inferior aspect of the sacroiliac joint were identified. A marker was placed one-third of the distance from the acetabular location to the inferior sacroiliac joint, indicating the target location. A 22-gauge, 3.5-inch spinal needle was directed through the gluteal muscles to the target location using intermittent fluoroscopic guidance. The posterior ileum was contacted and the needle was withdrawn 1 –2 mm. This approach found the needle within the piriformis muscle belly 2 –3 cm lateral to sciatic nerve. The present study was the first study, to our knowledge, that has confirmed the intramuscular position of the needle within the piriformis muscle of a cadaveric specimen using these anatomic landmarks and fluoroscopic guidance. Key words: piriformis syndrome, back pain, fluoroscopy, sciatica


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 204589402199144
Author(s):  
Hythem Nawaytou ◽  
Jeffrey R. Fineman ◽  
Shahin Moledina ◽  
Dunbar Ivy ◽  
Steven H. Abman ◽  
...  

Development of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in patients with left side heart disease (LHD) is a predictor of poor prognosis. The use of pulmonary vasodilators in PH associated with LHD (PH-LHD) is controversial. In this study, we describe the practice patterns regarding the use of pulmonary vasodilators in PH-LHD among a group of international pediatric PH specialists. A survey was distributed to the members of three pediatric PH networks: PPHNet, PVRI, and REHIPED. The survey queried participants on the rationale, indications, and contraindications of the use of pulmonary vasodilators in children with PH-LHD. Forty-seven PH specialists from 39 PH centers completed the survey. Participants included PH specialists from North America (57%), South America (15%), and Europe (19%). The majority of participants (74%) recommended the use of pulmonary vasodilators only in patients with combined pre-capillary and post-capillary pulmonary hypertension. Participants required the presence of clinical symptoms or signs of heart failure (68%) or right ventricular dysfunction by echocardiography (51%) in order to recommend pulmonary vasodilator therapy. There was no agreement regarding hemodynamic criteria used to recommend pulmonary vasodilators or the etiologies of LHD considered contraindications for using pulmonary vasodilators to manage PH-LHD. Of the available PH-targeted drugs, most participants preferred the use of phosphodiesterase-5-inhibitors for this indication. In conclusion, the practice of recommending pulmonary vasodilators in PH-LHD is highly variable among international pediatric PH specialists. Most specialists of those surveyed (57% in North America) would consider the use of pulmonary vasodilators in PH-LHD only if pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular dysfunction are present.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document