Association between partial-volume corrected SUVmax and Oncotype DX recurrence score in early-stage, ER-positive/HER2-negative invasive breast cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (9) ◽  
pp. 1574-1584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Su Hyun Lee ◽  
Seunggyun Ha ◽  
Hyun Joon An ◽  
Jae Sung Lee ◽  
Wonshik Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Invasive Breast Cancer ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Recurrence Score ◽  
Oncotype Dx ◽  
Partial Volume ◽  
Er Positive ◽  
Oncotype Dx Recurrence Score

A novel 95-gene signature (Curebest 95GC Breast) that predicts recurrence-risk in patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative, early-stage primary invasive breast cancer with an intermediate Oncotype DX Recurrence Score.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 542-542
Author(s):  
Takeo Fujii ◽  
Hiroko Masuda ◽  
Yee Chung Cheng ◽  
Fei Yang ◽  
Aysegul A. Sahin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Invasive Breast Cancer ◽  
Recurrence Score ◽  
Recurrence Risk ◽  
Gene Signature ◽  
Oncotype Dx ◽  
Node Negative ◽  
Er Positive ◽  
Chemoendocrine Therapy ◽  
Oncotype Dx Recurrence Score

542 Background: The TAILORx trial demonstrated that adjuvant endocrine and chemoendocrine therapies had similar efficacy in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer with an Oncotype DX recurrence score (RS) of 11-25. However, a predictive strategy is needed to identify patients with intermediate RS who may benefit from adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy. Curebest 95GC Breast (95GC) is a 95-gene signature that can stratify patients into two groups with high (95GC-H) and low (95GC-L) groups to predict the risk of recurrence. Our primary objective was to show that 95GC can classify patients with intermediate RS into binary recurrence risk groups. Methods: Patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative invasive breast cancer and RS 11-30 who underwent definitive surgery and adjuvant endocrine therapy were included. RNA was derived from archived formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples, and 95GC was calculated as reported previously. The Fisher exact and Brunner-Munzel tests were used to compare variables between 95GC groups. A Kaplan-Meier estimate with a log-rank test was used for recurrence-free survival (RFS) analysis. Results: The analysis included 178 patients from five institutions. The 5-year RFS rate in patients with RS 18-30 was higher in the 95GC-L group (n = 129, 96.3%) than in the 95GC-H group (n = 49, 90.9%; p = 0.002), which was consistent with results in an independent Japanese population (n = 224; p < 0.001). RFS rates significantly differed between the groups among patients with RS 11-25 as well (95GC-L, 97.4%; 95GC-H, 87.1%; p = 0.001). RFS rates did not differ between patients with RS 18-25 (94.8%) and those with RS 26-30 (93.8%; p = 0.33). Conclusions: 95GC can predict recurrence risk in patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative invasive breast cancer and intermediate RS. Further prospective retrospective studies in the TAILORx population are warranted to confirm that 95GC can identify patients who may benefit from adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy.

Evaluating utilization characteristics for the Oncotype DX recurrence score in early-stage breast cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 625-625
Author(s):  
C. Chen ◽  
D. A. Patt ◽  
D. R. Kazzaz ◽  
J. Shankleton ◽  
M. T. Forsyth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Recurrence Score ◽  
Oncotype Dx ◽  
Early Stage Breast Cancer ◽  
Oncotype Dx Recurrence Score

21-gene recurrence score assay as a predictor of pathological response in neoadjuvant chemotherapy administration for ER-positive/HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12630-e12630
Author(s):  
Serafin Morales Murillo ◽  
Ariadna Gasol Cudós ◽  
Alvaro Rodriguez ◽  
Carles Canosa Morales ◽  
Jordi Melé Olivé ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Recurrence Score ◽  
Pathological Response ◽  
Oncotype Dx ◽  
Response Type ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Er Positive ◽  
Score Result ◽  
Oncotype Dx Recurrence Score

e12630 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is an optimal option in early breast cancer, but in ER-positive/HER2-negative (luminal) is still controversial, although a survival benefit has recently been observed when a histological response by symmands method type 0 or I is achieved. The 21-Gene recurrence score assay (Oncotype DX) is a validated test to assess the survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients but its role in neoadjuvant setting is not yet well established unknown. We analyze the correlation between Oncotype DX Recurrence Score result and the pathological response assessed by symmands method. Methods: We analyzed a prospective cohort of 63 early luminal breast cancer patients who received NAC after performing an Oncotype DX test. Patients with an Oncotype DX Recurrence Score result lower 11 were excluded. The median age was 54 years (31-84), initial tumor size was 37 mm (12 -97), 41 patients (65%) had initial nodal involvement and the median Ki67 index was 34% (8 – 85). Results: An Oncotype DX results inferior or equal to 25 (considered as a limited benefit of chemotherapy treatment) was observed in 25 patients (40%) and a Recurrence Score higher than 25 in 38 (60%). Pathological response type 0 was achieved in 5 patients (8%) and type I in 16 (25%). A strong correlation between pathological response type 0 and I and Recurrence Score result in the univariate and multivariate analysis (OR 0,946 p:0,023) was found. We have performed a threshold analysis finding the Oncotype DX the most significant predictor of pathological response (AUC:0,75 p:0,0 01 ) compared to Ki67 (AUC:0,61 p:171), Estrogen receptor (AUC:0,41 p:0,21) and initial tumor size (AUC:0,671 p:0,028). All the patients who achieved a complete pathological response had a Recurrence Score result ≥ 26. Conclusions: The Oncotype DX Recurrence Score could be a useful tool to select early breast cancer patients who will benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Oncotype DX is the most significant predictor variable of pathological response and patients with a Recurrence Score of 25 or greater are five times more likely to obtain a histological response type 0-1 (OR: 5,3 p < 0,016). In our series the Oncotype DX test reaches the highest rate of complete pathological responses in this group of patients.

A comparative analysis of distant recurrence risk assessments by Oncotype DX recurrence score alone and integrated with clinicopathologic factors in early-stage breast cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 598-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ciara Marie Kelly ◽  
Rose Beamish ◽  
John McCaffrey ◽  
Martina SMITH ◽  
John Crown ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Recurrence Score ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Recurrence Risk ◽  
Distant Recurrence ◽  
Oncotype Dx ◽  
Node Negative ◽  
Er Positive ◽  
Clinicopathologic Factors ◽  
Oncotype Dx Recurrence Score

598 Background: Treatment planning for patients with node negative, ER-positive, HER-2 negative breast cancer often incorporates the use of prognostic and predictive tools like Oncotype DX. Prior to the availabilty of Oncotype DX, clinicopathologic factors such as age, nodal status, tumour size and grade were used to determine risk of recurrence (ROR). RSPC represents a validated formal integration of oncotype DX recurrence score (RS) and clinicopathologic factors that further refines prognostic accuracy. RSPC does not improve the prediction of likelihood of chemotherapy benefit. The objective of this study was to compare distant recurrence risk assessment by RS and RSPC. Methods: We included patients with node negative, ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer who had Oncotype DX testing routinely or on clinical trial. We retrospectively reviewed patient charts and extracted clinicopathological and RS data. We calculated the RSPC using the RSPC educational tool. A comparative analysis was performed looking at the statification of patients into low (LR), intermediate (IR) and high (HR) ROR groups by RS and RSPC. The cut offs for low, intermediate and high risk by the RSPC were set to less than 12%, 12-20% and more than 20% risk of distant recurrence at 10yrs, corresponding to the risks of recurrence associated with the RS categories. Results: We identified 658 patients from 5 academic hospitals in Ireland and the US. Oncotype DX RS classified the following proportions of patients into three risk groups for distant recurrence: LR, n=334 (50.5%), IR, n=259 (39.4%), HR, n=67 (10.1%). RSPC classified the following proportion of patients into the three risk groups for recurrence: LR, n= 455 (69.1%), IR, n=110 (16.7%), HR, n=93 (14.1%). RSPC reclassified 72.6% (n=188) of the IR group (59.1% (n=153) from IR to LR and 13.5% (n=35) from IR to HR). RPSC reclassified 10.5% (n=35) of the LR group (8.1% (n=27) from LR to IR, and 2.4% (n=8) from LR to HR). RSPC reclassified 25.3% (n=17) of the HR group (17.9% (n=12) from HR to IR, and 7.4% (n=5) from HR to LR). Conclusions: RSPC reclassified 240 patients (36.5%) and was most helpful reassigning the IR group.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document