Combined SPIO–gadolinium magnetic resonance imaging in cirrhotic patients: negative predictive value and role in screening for hepatocellular carcinoma

2007 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 520-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boris Guiu ◽  
Romaric Loffroy ◽  
Douraied Ben Salem ◽  
Come Lepage ◽  
Séverine Guiu ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Sondipon Biswas ◽  
Naman Kanodia ◽  
Rajat Tak ◽  
Siddharth Agrawal ◽  
Kiran Shankar Roy

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Shoulder pathologies can cause significant pain, discomfort, and affect the activity of daily living. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of clinical examination, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with shoulder arthroscopy in diagnosing various shoulder pathologies, considering shoulder arthroscopy as the gold standard tool.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> This was a prospective, comparative study conducted over 35 patients, between 18-75 years of age presenting with chronic shoulder pain or instability of more than 2 months duration. All patients were examined clinically, followed by high resolution ultrasound, MRI, arthroscopy of the affected shoulder.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography (USG) for diagnosing full thickness tear was 100% each and for MRI was 88% and 100% respectively. For subacromial impingement USG had sensitivity of 66.67%, specificity of 94.12%, positive predictive value of 50% and negative predictive value of 88.89%. For rotator cuff tear USG had sensitivity of 92.86%, specificity of 50%, positive predictive value of 81.25% and negative predictive value of 75% considering shoulder arthroscopy as gold standard.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> USG and MRI both are sensitive techniques for diagnosing of rotator cuff pathologies. USG has high accuracy in diagnosing partial thickness tears as compare to MRI. MRI proved to be superior in estimation of site and extent of tear. Considering shoulder arthroscopy as gold standard, it can be reserved for patients with suspicious of USG/MRI findings or those who may need surgical intervention simultaneously.</p>


2002 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 806-809 ◽  
Author(s):  
William B. Stetson ◽  
Kevin Templin

Background Tears of the superior labrum of the shoulder, anterior to posterior, are difficult to diagnose clinically. Purpose We examined whether the crank or O'Brien tests were reliable tools for detecting glenoid labral tears. Study Design Nonrandomized prospective study. Methods Results of diagnostic shoulder arthroscopy were compared with those of the preoperative tests and magnetic resonance imaging for 65 patients who had symptoms of shoulder pain. Results The crank test result was positive in 29 patients (45%), and the O'Brien test was positive in 41 patients (63%). The crank test had a positive predictive value of 41%, was 56% specific, 46% sensitive, and had a negative predictive value of 61%. The O'Brien test had a positive predictive value of 34%, was 31% specific, 54% sensitive, and had a negative predictive value of 50%. Magnetic resonance imaging had a positive predictive value of 63%, was 92% specific, 42% sensitive, and had a negative predictive value of 83%. Conclusions The O'Brien and crank tests were not sensitive clinical indicators for detecting glenoid labral tears and other tears of the anterior and posterior labrum. Results were often falsely positive for patients with other shoulder conditions, including impingement or rotator cuff tears.


2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 193-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne M. Bleker ◽  
Shandra Bipat ◽  
Anje M. Spijkerboer ◽  
Jacobus van der Velden ◽  
Jaap Stoker ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare the negative predictive value (NPV) of clinical examination with or without anesthesia and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in identifying patients with cervical carcinoma without parametrial infiltration.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Academic Medical Center in Amsterdam. The medical files of 203 patients diagnosed with cervical cancer stages IB1-IIA, who underwent surgical treatment between January 1, 2003, and January 31, 2011, were reviewed. We compared clinical International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging and MRI during the staging procedure. The results were compared with the parametrial status by surgical-pathological investigation, which was considered to be the reference standard.ResultsBased on the surgical-pathological findings, 16.7% of the patients treated surgically had parametrial infiltration. For parametrial infiltration, examination under anesthesia (EUA) had an NPV of 65.3% and MRI of 76.9%, respectively. We found no significant difference between these NPVs.ConclusionsExamination under anesthesia and MRI are equal in identifying cervical cancer patients without parametrial infiltration with a tendency for MRI to perform better than EUA. When outpatient clinical staging is considered inconclusive, pretreatment staging may be limited to MRI. In these cases, EUA seems to have no additional value.


2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 293
Author(s):  
Miguel Ramalho ◽  
Mamdoh AlObaidy ◽  
António P. Matos ◽  
Richard C. Semelka

n/a


2018 ◽  
Vol 127 (12) ◽  
pp. 919-925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roman D. Laske ◽  
Thomas N. Roth ◽  
Krisztina Baráth ◽  
Bernhard Schuknecht ◽  
Alexander M. Huber ◽  
...  

Introduction: The aim of this study was to analyze the sensitivity and specificity of non-echoplanar (non-EPI) diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection of cholesteatoma, with a focus on its value as an adjunct to clinical examination. Methods: In a prospective cohort study, 92 cases were divided into 2 groups: “clinically cholesteatoma” ( n = 79) and “clinically no cholesteatoma” ( n = 13). Non-EPI DW MRI was performed preoperatively in all cases. The presence of a cholesteatoma was assessed by clinicians otoscopically, by neuroradiologists on non-EPI DW MRI, by the surgeon intraoperatively, and finally by the pathologist postoperatively. Data analysis was performed for specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and interrater variability. Results: The sensitivity and specificity were 89.3% and 75%, respectively, in the “clinically cholesteatoma” group and 0% and 100% in the “clinically no cholesteatoma” group. Non-EPI DW MRI had a positive predictive value of 98.5% when cholesteatoma was suspected clinically and a negative predictive value of 84.6% when cholesteatoma was not suspected clinically. Conclusion: If cholesteatoma is suspected clinically, non-EPI DW MRI is not necessary. If there is no clinical suspicion of cholesteatoma in second-look situations, sensitivity is low and serial follow-up MRI with long intervals is advised.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document