Sarcopenia predicts 90-day mortality in elderly patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 1155-1160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Brandt ◽  
Line Toft Tengberg ◽  
Morten Bay-Nielsen
2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (6) ◽  
pp. 1179-1186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erika L. Rangel ◽  
Arturo J. Rios-Diaz ◽  
Jennifer W. Uyeda ◽  
Manuel Castillo-Angeles ◽  
Zara Cooper ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hwee Leong Tan ◽  
Shermain Theng Xin Chia ◽  
Nivedita Vikas Nadkarni ◽  
Shin Yuh Ang ◽  
Dennis Chuen Chai Seow ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Frailty has been associated with an increased risk of adverse postoperative outcomes in elderly patients. We examined the impact of preoperative frailty on loss of functional independence following emergency abdominal surgery in the elderly. Methods This prospective cohort study was performed at a tertiary hospital, enrolling patients 65 years of age and above who underwent emergency abdominal surgery from June 2016 to February 2018. Premorbid variables, perioperative characteristics and outcomes were collected. Two frailty measures were compared in this study—the Modified Fried’s Frailty Criteria (mFFC) and Modified Frailty Index-11 (mFI-11). Patients were followed-up for 1 year. Results A total of 109 patients were prospectively recruited. At baseline, 101 (92.7%) were functionally independent, of whom seven (6.9%) had loss of independence at 1 year; 28 (25.7%) and 81 (74.3%) patients were frail and non-frail (by mFFC) respectively. On univariate analysis, age, Charlson Comorbidity Index and frailty (mFFC) (univariate OR 13.00, 95% CI 2.21–76.63, p < 0.01) were significantly associated with loss of functional independence at 1 year. However, frailty, as assessed by mFI-11, showed a weaker correlation than mFFC (univariate OR 4.42, 95% CI 0.84–23.12, p = 0.06). On multivariable analysis, only premorbid frailty (by mFFC) remained statistically significant (OR 15.63, 95% CI 2.12–111.11, p < 0.01). Conclusions The mFFC is useful for frailty screening amongst elderly patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery and is a predictor for loss of functional independence at 1 year. Including the risk of loss of functional independence in perioperative discussions with patients and caregivers is important for patient-centric emergency surgical care. Early recognition of this at-risk group could help with discharge planning and priority for post-discharge support should be considered.


2015 ◽  
Vol 86 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakub Kenig ◽  
Piotr Richter ◽  
Urszula Olszewska ◽  
Beata Żychiewicz

AbstractUntil now, the literature about the influence of specific comorbid conditions on outcome of emergency abdominal surgery in polish elderly patients is scars.was to determine the prognostic role of comorbidities in patients qualified for emergency abdominal surgery.. One hundred and eighty four consecutive patients(98 female and 86 male). 65 years of age were prospectively enrolled. The mean age was 76.9±5.8 (range 65-100) years old.. Only 16% of patients did not have any preoperative comorbidity. The 30-day mortality was 24.5% (45 patients). The 30-day morbidity was experienced by the 58.7% (108 patients), including 40 patients (21.7%) with minor complications and 68 patients (37%) with major complications, according to the Clavien-Dindo complications scale.The dysrhythmia (odds ratio 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.6, p=0.02), vascular disease (odds ratio 2.1, 95% CI 1.4- 3.1, p=0.02) and renal disease (odds ratio 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-2.8, p=0.01) were independent risk factors of 30-day morbidity. The vascular disease was also the independent risk factor of 30-day postoperative death in the multivariate regression analysis (odds ratio 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-2.8, p=0.001).Preoperative comorbidities are common among elderly patients qualified for emergency abdominal surgery. However, only some of them (the dysrhythmia, the vascular disease and the renal disease) are independent risk factors of postoperative adverse outcomes. Therefore, number of comorbidies alone should not be the reason for a limited treatment.


Author(s):  
Julie Jacoby Petersen ◽  
Birte Østergaard ◽  
Erla Kolbrún Svavarsdóttir ◽  
Steffen Jais Rosenstock ◽  
Anne Brødsgaard

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document