Use of the NatureServe Climate Change Vulnerability Index as an Assessment Tool for Reptiles and Amphibians: Lessons Learned

2015 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 822-834 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tracey D. Tuberville ◽  
Kimberly M. Andrews ◽  
Jinelle H. Sperry ◽  
Andrew M. Grosse
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-79
Author(s):  
Sridevi Gummadi ◽  
Amalendu Jyotishi ◽  
G Jagadeesh

India’s overall ranking on the Global Climate Risk Index has been deteriorating in recent years, making it more vulnerable to climate risks. It has been indicated in the literature that climate change is also associated with agrarian distress. However, empirical analyses are scanty on this, especially in the Indian context. In this analytical exercise, we tried to explore the association between farmers’ suicides and climate change vulnerability across Indian states. Using data from various sources, we arrive at an Agrarian Vulnerability Index and juxtaposed that with farmers’ suicide data between 1996 to 2015 collected from the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB). We noted a strong association between climate change vulnerability and farmers’ suicides. The essence of this analysis is to indicate and understand the broad trends and associations. This research, in the process, informs and presses for a systematic, more comprehensive study with an agenda at micro and meso levels to understand the nuances of this association. Submitted: 01 November 2020; Revised: 11 January 2021; Accepted: 29 April 2021


2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 174-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce E. Young ◽  
Natalie S. Dubois ◽  
Erika L. Rowland

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tara Zolnikov ◽  
Daisy Ramirez-Ortiz ◽  
Jennifer Raymond ◽  
Deborah Chambers ◽  
Robert Brears ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Climate change affects people, not only through environmental exposures and health outcomes, but how they live their lives. Consequences will affect various sectors, ranging from tourism to water to energy development—areas where people live, work, and enjoy. Because of these forced changes, people must adapt. Methods: A scoping review was created to understand climate change vulnerability alongside adaption and resiliency measures that are being implemented in each continent of the world; this review is a subset of information from Zolnikov, T. R. (2019). Global Adaptation and Resilience to Climate Change. In: T. R. Zolnikov (Ed.). Cham, Switzerland; Springer International Publishing. Results: It was determined that adaptive capacity differs worldwide. This is likely because the capacity to adapt and change is linked to both social and economic development; some regions in the world may not be sufficiently equipped and thus, may not be able to mitigate or adapt to changes. Such was the case in Australia, Europe, and North and South America, where economic resources were more available, and the general culture of climate change appeared to be more developed through various policies. Whereas, for example, Asia and Africa were less economically developed and focused less on individual changes, but joined larger climate change agreements, such as the Kyoto Protocol. Conclusions: The objective of this review was to understand the differences that may help or hinder progress under the new world set forth by climate change. The information provided evidence that a “one size fits all” approach does not work to promote climate change resiliency. In fact, each continent in the world suffers from some barriers to change, while also offering elements of success that can be shared. It is these types of lessons learned that can help pull the world together to learn from each other and promote the effectiveness of measures as well as the capacity for populations to adapt. Keywords: Climate Change, Environmental Health, Global Health


2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 142 ◽  
Author(s):  
HarshalT Pandve ◽  
Kevin Fernandez ◽  
PS Chawla ◽  
SamirA Singru

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 811 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vitor Zanetti ◽  
Wilson de Sousa Junior ◽  
Débora De Freitas

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 4438
Author(s):  
George Halkos ◽  
Antonis Skouloudis ◽  
Chrisovalantis Malesios ◽  
Nikoleta Jones

Assessing vulnerability is key in the planning of climate change adaptation policies and, more importantly, in determining actions increasing resilience across different locations. This study presents the results of a hierarchical linear multilevel modeling approach that utilizes as dependent variable the Notre Dame Global Adaptation Initiative (ND-GAIN) Climate Change Vulnerability Index and explores the relative impact of a number of macro-level characteristics on vulnerability, including GDP, public debt, population, agricultural coverage and sociopolitical and institutional conditions. A 1995–2016 annual time series that yields a panel dataset of 192 countries is employed. Findings suggest that country-level climate change vulnerability is responding (strongly) to the majority of the explanatory variables considered. Findings also confirm that less-developed countries demonstrate increased vulnerability compared to the developed ones and those in transition stages. While these results indeed warrant further attention, they provide a background for a more nuanced understanding of aspects defining country-level patterns of climate vulnerability.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan S. Debortoli ◽  
Dylan G. Clark ◽  
James D. Ford ◽  
Jesse S. Sayles ◽  
Emilia P. Diaconescu

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Kontogianni ◽  
D. Damigos ◽  
T. Kyrtzoglou ◽  
C. Tourkolias ◽  
M. Skourtos

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document