Radiofrequency Ablation Zones in Ex Vivo Bovine and In Vivo Porcine Livers: Comparison of the Use of Internally Cooled Electrodes and Internally Cooled Wet Electrodes

2009 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 1235-1240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jihoon Cha ◽  
Dongil Choi ◽  
Min Woo Lee ◽  
Hyunchul Rhim ◽  
Young-sun Kim ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 150-155
Author(s):  
Haruyuki Takaki ◽  
Yuki Kodama ◽  
Hisao Miyamoto ◽  
Yuto Iijima ◽  
Yoshinari Kikuchi ◽  
...  

Radiology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 278 (2) ◽  
pp. 395-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mi Hye Yu ◽  
Jae Young Lee ◽  
Su Ryoung Jun ◽  
Kyung Won Kim ◽  
Se Hyung Kim ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
F. G. M. Poch ◽  
C. A. Neizert ◽  
B. Geyer ◽  
O. Gemeinhardt ◽  
S. M. Niehues ◽  
...  

AbstractMultibipolar radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an advanced ablation technique for early stage hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastases. Vessel cooling in multibipolar RFA has not been systematically investigated. The objective of this study was to evaluate the presence of perivascular vital cells within the ablation zone after multibipolar RFA. Multibipolar RFA were performed in domestic pigs in vivo. Three internally cooled bipolar RFA applicators were used simultaneously. Three experimental settings were planned: (1) inter-applicator-distance: 15 mm; (2) inter-applicator-distance: 20 mm; (3) inter-applicator-distance: 20 mm with hepatic inflow occlusion (Pringle maneuver). A vitality staining was used to analyze liver cell vitality around all vessels in the ablation center with a diameter > 0.5 mm histologically. 771 vessels were identified. No vital tissue was seen around 423 out of 429 vessels (98.6%) situated within the central white zone. Vital cells could be observed around major hepatic vessels situated adjacent to the ablation center. Vessel diameter (> 3.0 mm; p < 0.05) and low vessel-to-ablation-center distance (< 0.2 mm; p < 0.05) were identified as risk factors for incomplete ablation adjacent to hepatic vessels. The vast majority of vessels, which were localized in the clinically relevant white zone, showed no vital perivascular cells, regardless of vessel diameter and vessel type. However, there was a risk of incomplete ablation around major hepatic vessels situated directly within the ablation center. A Pringle maneuver could avoid incomplete ablations.


2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eliel Ben-David ◽  
Isaac Nissenbaum ◽  
Svetlana Gurevich ◽  
Eric R. Cosman ◽  
S. Nahum Goldberg

Radiology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 254 (2) ◽  
pp. 430-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liat Appelbaum ◽  
Jacob Sosna ◽  
Robert Pearson ◽  
Sarah Perez ◽  
Yizhak Nissenbaum ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaowei Zhao ◽  
Ohad Ziv ◽  
Reza Mohammadpour ◽  
Benjamin Crosby ◽  
Walter J. Hoyt ◽  
...  

AbstractRadiofrequency ablation (RFA) is commonly used to treat atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the outcome is often compromised due to the lack of direct real-time feedback to assess lesion transmurality. In this work, we evaluated the ability of polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography (PSOCT) to measure cardiac wall thickness and assess RF lesion transmurality during left atrium (LA) RFA procedures. Quantitative transmural lesion criteria using PSOCT images were determined ex vivo using an integrated PSOCT-RFA catheter and fresh swine hearts. LA wall thickness of living swine was measured with PSOCT and validated with a micrometer after harvesting the heart. A total of 38 point lesions were created in the LA of 5 living swine with the integrated PSOCT-RFA catheter using standard clinical RFA procedures. For all lesions with analyzable PSOCT images, lesion transmurality was assessed with a sensitivity of 89% (17 of 19 tested positive) and a specificity of 100% (5 of 5 tested negative) using the quantitative transmural criteria. This is the first report of using PSOCT to assess LA RFA lesion transmurality in vivo. The results indicate that PSOCT may potentially provide direct real-time feedback for LA wall thickness and lesion transmurality.


2011 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 526-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoo Na Kim ◽  
Hyunchul Rhim ◽  
Dongil Choi ◽  
Young-sun Kim ◽  
Min Woo Lee ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document