Effectiveness of prophylactic antiviral therapy in reducing HBV reactivation for HBsAg-positive recipients following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantatio:a multi-institutional experience from an HBV endemic area

Author(s):  
Yibo Wu ◽  
Yi Chen ◽  
Panpan Zhu ◽  
Baodong Ye ◽  
Ying Lu ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yibo Wu ◽  
He Huang ◽  
Yi Luo

The high morbidity of HBV reactivation following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is partially due to the intense immunologic potency of complex therapeutic regimens, the use of antithymocyte globulin and calcineurin inhibitors to prevent graft versus-host disease (GVHD), prolonged immune reconstitution, and hematological malignancies infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV). Immunosuppression results in the reactivation of HBV replication from covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) residing in hepatocytes. However, the role of viral mutations during HBV reactivation needs to be validated. All individuals scheduled to receive allo-HSCT or wish to donate stem cells should be screened for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), antibodies to hepatitis B core (anti-HBc), and HBV-DNA. HBsAg-positive recipients of allo-HSCT have a high risk of HBV reactivation; thus, they should receive prophylactic antiviral therapy. The high barrier to resistance nucleos(t)-ide analogs (NAs) seems to be superior to the low barrier agents. Resolved-HBV recipients have a lower risk of HBV reactivation than HBsAg-positive recipients. Although prophylactic antiviral therapy remains controversial, regular monitoring of alanine transaminase (ALT) and HBV-DNA combined with preemptive antiviral treatment may be an optimized strategy. However, optimal antiviral therapy duration and time intervals for monitoring remain to be established. Accepting stem cells from HBsAg-positive donors is associated with a risk of developing HBV-related hepatitis. The overall intervention strategy, including donors and recipients, may decrease the risk of HBV-related hepatitis following HSCT from HBsAg positive stem cells. In this review, we summarize the issues of HBV in allo-HSCT, including HBV reactivation mechanism, HBsAg-positive recipients, HBV-resolved infection recipients, and donor-related factors, and discuss their significance.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 4376-4376
Author(s):  
Xiaojin Wu ◽  
Wu Depei ◽  
Aining Sun ◽  
Xiaowen Tang ◽  
Zhengzheng Fu ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: To investigate the incidence, risk factor and management of CMV reactivation in patients revived hematopoietic stem cell transplantation(HSCT). Methods: 374 patients including 275 consecutive allogeneic and 99 autologous patients after bone marrow/stem cell transplantation from May 2001 to December 2007 were studied at our institution with nest-PCR and pp65 antigen assay. Anticoagulant blood samples were obtained from the recipients once weekly after days 14. After three months the CMV monitoring was performed every one month or every three months. If the patients catch CMV again after three year, the CMV monitoring was performed again. Results: The incidence of CMV positive in autologous patients was 3.03% and was 54.91% in allogeneic patients with a median onset of 48 days post transplants during 1 to 81 months. The difference between them is significant; The infection rate in the nonmyeloablative allogeneic peripheral stem cell transplantation (NST) group was 61.76%, in the group of HLA—identical sibling donor HSCT(sib-HSCT) was 47.10%, in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Hi-HSCT) group was 75.00% and in the group of unrelated bone marrow transplantation (UR-BMT) was 57.45%. The infection rate of CMV in the Hi-HSCT group was higher than that in the group of sib-HSCT with significant difference (P<0.05); The incidence rate of CMV infection in patients with regimen including ATG was higher than that without ATG ((65%&47.1%, P<0.05); The incidence rate of CMV infection in patients with III–IV grade aGVHD and patients without III–IV aGVHD had not significant difference (P>0.05). There was not significant difference in the occurance of aGVHD between the patients with and without CMV infection (P>0.05).5.87.8% patients are effective on antiviral therapy, incidence of CMV disease is very low, 0.65% patients catch CMV more than once. Conclusion FCMV infection is common in our study, Minoriting CMV for long time is necessary, which benefit to antiviral therapy and judging of prognosis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document