Comparative Analysis of the Gut Bacterial Community of Four Anastrepha Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Based on Pyrosequencing

2018 ◽  
Vol 75 (8) ◽  
pp. 966-976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen Ventura ◽  
Carlos I. Briones-Roblero ◽  
Emilio Hernández ◽  
Flor N. Rivera-Orduña ◽  
Gerardo Zúñiga
Aquaculture ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 513 ◽  
pp. 734427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhen Zhang ◽  
Zhimeng Lv ◽  
Weiwei Zhang ◽  
Yina Shao ◽  
Xuelin Zhao ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 782-792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Numberger ◽  
Daniel P. R. Herlemann ◽  
Klaus Jürgens ◽  
Guido Dehnhardt ◽  
Heide Schulz‐Vogt

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego Leiva ◽  
Fernando Fernández-Mendoza ◽  
José Acevedo ◽  
Margarita Carú ◽  
Martin Grube ◽  
...  

<p>The lichen microbiome includes a diverse community of organisms, spanning widely across the bacterial tree of life. Lichens have been proposed to form partially open symbiotic systems, in which some microorganisms may be transmitted along within lichen propagules, while others are acquired from the surrounding environmental community.</p><p>In this survey, we discuss the extent to which the lichen microbiome is connected to that of its immediate substrate. For this we sampled ten specimens of the Patagonian foliose cyanolichen <em>Peltigera frigida</em> and their underlying soil substrates in two forest sites of the Coyhaique National Reserve (Aysén Region, Chile). Using 16S metabarcoding with primers that exclude cyanobacteria, we identified a significant taxonomic divergence between the bacterial communities of lichens and substrates.</p><p>At the Phylum level, Proteobacteria (37% of relative abundance) are most abundant within lichens, while soil substrates are dominated by Acidobacteriota (39%). At the Genus level, some bacteria are significantly more abundant in lichens, such as <em>Sphingomonas</em> (8% in lichens vs 0.2% in substrates) or an unassigned genus of Chitinophagaceae (10% vs 2%). Conversely, genera like the unassigned acidobacterial genus SCN-69-37 (0.9% vs 12%) are more abundant in substrates.</p><p>Overall, our results are consistent with the idea that lichens shape their microbiome obtaining components from various sources, including reproductive propagules and the substrate on which they grow. Further experimental and ecological approaches are needed to assess the contribution of these microorganisms to the fitness of the symbiotic system.</p><p>Funding: FONDECYT 1181510.</p>


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofya A. Medvedeva ◽  
Alexander Y. Panchin ◽  
Andrey V. Alexeevski ◽  
Sergey A. Spirin ◽  
Yuri V. Panchin

In general, mutation frequencies are context-dependent: specific adjacent nucleotides may influence the probability to observe a specific type of mutation in a genome. Recently, several hypermutable motifs were identified in the human genome. Namely, there is an increased frequency of T>C mutations in the second position of the words ATTG and ATAG and an increased frequency of A>C mutations in the first position of the word ACAA. Previous studies have also shown that there is a remarkable difference between the mutagenesis of humans and drosophila. While C>T mutations are overrepresented in the CG context in humans (and other vertebrates), this mutation regularity is not observed inDrosophila melanogaster. Such differences in the observed regularities of mutagenesis between representatives of different taxa might reflect differences in the mechanisms involved in mutagenesis. We performed a systematical comparison of mutation regularities within 2–4 bp contexts inHomo sapiensandDrosophila melanogasterand found that the aforementioned contexts are not hypermutable in fruit flies. It seems that most mutation contexts affect mutation rates in a similar manner inH. sapiensandD. melanogaster; however, several important exceptions are noted and discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document