Den site selection of wolves (Canis lupus) in response to declining caribou (Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus) density in the central Canadian Arctic

Polar Biology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 38 (12) ◽  
pp. 2007-2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Klaczek ◽  
Chris. J. Johnson ◽  
H. Dean Cluff
PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. e76410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Girish Arjun Punjabi ◽  
Ravi Chellam ◽  
Abi Tamim Vanak

Ursus ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 226-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan S. Libal ◽  
Jerrold L. Belant ◽  
Ramona Maraj ◽  
Bruce D. Leopold ◽  
Guiming Wang ◽  
...  

Rangifer ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 44
Author(s):  
Otto Blehr

The behaviour of single, and small bands of caribou (Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus) when confronted by humans was compared with the energy—saving behaviour zoologists have ascribed to caribou in encounters with non-hunting wolves (Canis lupus). When confronted by me, or upon getting my scent, caribou ran away on all occasions. Their flight was occasionally interrupted by short stops to look back in my direction, but would continue on all occasions until they were out of sight. This behaviour is inconsistent with the one ascribed to caribou by zoologists when the intruder is a wolf instead of a human. In their view, the caribou stop their flight soon after the wolf gives up the chase, and accordingly save energy owing to their ability to distinguish between hunting and non-hunting wolves. However, small bands of caribou, as well as single animals, have never been observed to behave in this manner. On the contrary, the behaviour of caribou in such encounters is known to follow the same pattern as in their encounters with humans. Energy—saving behaviour is, however, sometimes observed when caribou become inquisitive about something in their surroundings. They will then readily approach as well as try to get down-wind of the object. When the object does not induce fear, it may simply be ignored, or charged before the caribou calm down. The effect of this "confirming behaviour" is that energy which would otherwise have been spent in needless flights from non-predators is saved.


2008 ◽  
Vol 122 (1) ◽  
pp. 49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jon R. Trapp ◽  
Paul Beier ◽  
Curt Mack ◽  
David R. Parsons ◽  
Paul C. Paquet

Because mortality of Wolves, Canis lupus, is highest during the first six months of life, den site selection may affect reproductive success of Wolf populations. We studied fine-scale denning habitat selection (within 100 m of den site) by comparing field-measured characteristics of 22 dens in Idaho, Montana, and Alberta with 22 paired random contrast locations within pack home ranges. In order of importance, Wolves denned in areas with greater canopy cover, hiding cover, herbaceous ground cover, and woody debris, and were closer to water than paired random sites. Thus Wolves may select den sites for physical protection and available water. We also studied coarse-scale denning habitat selection by comparing 35 Wolf dens with 35 paired contrast locations in Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming with respect to six remotely-sensed variables (elevation, slope, coniferous forest cover, solar radiation, distance to water, and distance to roads). Although these variables did not differ (univariate P > 0.10) between den and contrast locations, a Mahalanobis-distance model using four remotely-sensed variables (slope, elevation, coniferous forest cover, and solar radiation) suggested > 85% of dens would occur in potential denning habitat occupying < 12% of the Wolf recovery areas in the northern Rocky Mountains. This model may be useful for identifying likely den locations in areas not yet occupied by Wolves. Wolf core use areas, including den areas, showed higher intensity of use throughout the year when compared to the entire territory.


2010 ◽  
Vol 88 (9) ◽  
pp. 905-913 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Ross ◽  
R. Kamnitzer ◽  
B. Munkhtsog ◽  
S. Harris

We evaluated the habitat selection of 101 den sites used by 21 individual Pallas’s cats ( Otocolobus manul (Pallas, 1776) = Felis manul Pallas, 1776) in summer, winter, and the maternal period in central Mongolia using generalized linear mixed models. Pallas’s cats used rock crevices and marmot burrows as dens for giving birth, raising young, thermoregulation, feeding, mating, and as important cover from predators. Den sites were selected with higher proportions of rocky and ravine habitats in the surroundings, and in winter Pallas’s cats avoided the presence of humans. Habitat and structural features suggested that dens were selected to minimize predation risk. Selection of dens in shade in summer and the use of insulated dens of Siberian marmots ( Marmota sibirica (Radde, 1862)) in winter indicated that thermal properties may also be important. We contend that dens are a critical habitat for Pallas’s cats and the availability of suitable den sites is critical for the conservation of the species. Repeated use of maternal dens suggested they may be a limiting resource. Although marmot dens are unlikely to be limiting at present, over hunting of marmots is likely to reduce burrow availability in the future.


Ursus ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lana M. Ciarniello ◽  
Mark S. Boyce ◽  
Douglas C. Heard ◽  
Dale R. Seip

2010 ◽  
Vol 124 (3) ◽  
pp. 270
Author(s):  
Brian W. Kiss ◽  
Scott K. Johnstone ◽  
Robert P. Berger

A single Gray Wolf (Canis lupus) was observed successfully trapping and predating a Barren-ground Caribou (Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus) in a small section of open water.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document