Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine: comparison of 2D T2-weighted turbo spin echo, 2D T2*weighted gradient-recalled echo and 3D T2-weighted variable flip-angle turbo spin echo sequences

2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 713-721 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Meindl ◽  
S. Wirth ◽  
S. Weckbach ◽  
O. Dietrich ◽  
M. Reiser ◽  
...  
Spine ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 1237-1244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna C. M. Oostveen ◽  
Alfred R. Roozeboom ◽  
Mart A. F. J. van de Laar ◽  
Jan Heeres ◽  
Jacques A. den Boer ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 157-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Zhalniarovich ◽  
Z. Adamiak ◽  
A. Pomianowski ◽  
M. Jaskólska

Abstract Magnetic resonance imaging is the best imaging modality for the brain and spine. Quality of the received images depends on many technical factors. The most significant factors are: positioning the patient, proper coil selection, selection of appropriate sequences and image planes. The present contrast between different tissues provides an opportunity to diagnose various lesions. In many clinics magnetic resonance imaging has replaced myelography because of its noninvasive modality and because it provides excellent anatomic detail. There are many different combinations of sequences possible for spinal and brain MR imaging. Most frequently used are: T2-weighted fast spin echo (FSE), T1- and T2-weighted turbo spin echo, Fluid Attenuation Inversion Recovery (FLAIR), T1-weighted gradient echo (GE) and spin echo (SE), high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) sequences, fat-suppressing short tau inversion recovery (STIR) and half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE). Magnetic resonance imaging reveals neurologic lesions which were previously hard to diagnose antemortem.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document