scholarly journals Simultaneous concentration and velocity field measurements in a shock-accelerated mixing layer

2014 ◽  
Vol 55 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Reese ◽  
Jason Oakley ◽  
Alonso Navarro-Nunez ◽  
David Rothamer ◽  
Chris Weber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Velocity Field ◽  
Mixing Layer ◽  
Field Measurements

Near-Wall Velocity Field Measurements of a Very Low Momentum Flux Transverse Jet

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. V. Salazar ◽  
D. J. Forliti ◽  
K. Kuzmich ◽  
E. Coy
Keyword(s):  
Velocity Field ◽  
Momentum Flux ◽  
Field Measurements ◽  
Wall Velocity ◽  
Transverse Jet ◽  
Near Wall

Time resolved flow-field measurements of a turbulent mixing layer over a rectangular cavity

2010 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiyao Bian ◽  
James F. Driscoll ◽  
Brian R. Elbing ◽  
Steven L. Ceccio
Keyword(s):  
Flow Field ◽  
Turbulent Mixing ◽  
Mixing Layer ◽  
Field Measurements ◽  
Rectangular Cavity ◽  
Time Resolved ◽  
Turbulent Mixing Layer

Velocity field measurements of a laminar thermal

1979 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 1044 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Shlien ◽  
A. Brosh
Keyword(s):  
Velocity Field ◽  
Field Measurements

scholarly journals Effects of Hole Shape on Film Cooling With Large Angle Injection

1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atui Kohil ◽  
David G. Bogard
Keyword(s):  
Velocity Field ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Field Measurements ◽  
Round Hole ◽  
Cooling Performance ◽  
Injection Angle ◽  
Hole Shape ◽  
Shaped Hole ◽  
Adiabatic Effectiveness ◽  
Better Than

In this study the film cooling performance of a single row of discrete holes inclined at an injection angle of 55° is investigated at a density ratio of DR = 1.6. Three different hole geometries were used in this study, a round hole and two shaped holes. One shaped hole had forward and lateral expansions of 15°, and the other a 15° lateral with a 25° forward expansion. For reference, a round hole with an injection angle of 35° was also tested. The film cooling performance of each hole shape was evaluated using adiabatic effectiveness, thermal field, and velocity field measurements. The shaped holes showed higher spatially averaged adiabatic effectiveness than the round hole over the whole range of momentum flux ratios (I) investigated. The effectiveness values for the shaped holes were only marginally better than the round hole at the low I, but at the high I, the shaped holes performed much better than the round hole. The temperature and velocity field measurements near the hole exit suggest that there is a slight detachment of the jet from the wall for the round hole, while the jets remain attached for the two shaped holes. The shaped hole with the larger forward expansion had a warmer jet with a higher trajectory at the hole exit suggesting ingestion of mainstream fluid and flow separation within the hole.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document