Effects of manual therapy on treatment duration and motor development in infants with severe nonsynostotic plagiocephaly: a randomised controlled pilot study

Abstract Background Large studies have shown that stroke is among the most relevant causes of acquired adult disability. Walking and balance impairment in stroke survivors often contribute to a restriction in daily activities and social participation. Task-oriented training (TOT) is an effective treatment strategy and manual therapy (MT) is used successfully to enhance ankle joint flexibility in this population. No study, however, has compared TOT against its combination with MT in a randomised controlled trial. Aims of this pilot study are therefore to explore the feasibility of a full-scale RCT using predefined feasibility criteria. Secondary aims are to explore the preliminary effects of specific TOT with a combined specific TOT-MT versus a control group in people post stroke. Methods This is a protocol of a 4-week prospective randomised controlled parallel pilot trial in people post stroke at the chronic stage with limited upper ankle joint mobility and an impairment in balance and mobility. At a German outpatient therapy centre using 1:1:1 allocation, 36 patients will be randomised into one of three groups: 15-min talocrural joint MT plus 30-min specific TOT (group A), 45-min specific TOT (group B), and controls (group C). Training will be goal-oriented including tasks that are based on daily activities and increased in difficulty utilising predefined progression criteria based on patients’ skill levels. Interventions will be provided face-to-face 2 times per week, for 4 weeks, in addition to 20-min concurrent x4 weekly home-based training sessions. Data will be collected by blinded assessors at baseline, post-intervention and 4-week follow-up. The primary outcome will be feasibility assessed by recruitment, retention and adherence rates, compliance, adverse events, falls and the acceptability of the intervention. Secondary outcomes will be walking speed, single and dual tasking functional mobility, ankle range of motion, disability and health-related quality of life. Discussion Feasibility provided, results from this study will be used to calculate the sample size of a larger randomised controlled trial to investigate the effects of specific TOT and specific TOT-MT compared to a post stroke control group. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00023068. Registered on 21.09.2020, https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00023068.

Download Full-text

Effects of integrated interventions on growth and development of young children: A meta-analysis

European Journal of Public Health ◽

10.1093/eurpub/ckaa166.909 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽

Author(s):

S Dulal ◽

A Prost ◽

N Saville ◽

S Karki ◽

D Merom

Keyword(s):

Language Development ◽

Usual Care ◽

Motor Development ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Developmental Outcomes ◽

Child Growth ◽

Detectable Effect ◽

Behaviour Change Techniques ◽

Positive Effects ◽

Randomised Controlled

Abstract Background We did a systematic review to understand: (a) the effects of integrated versus usual care on the developmental outcomes and nutritional status of children under five years; and (b) which intervention characteristics are associated with positive effects. Methods We searched eight electronic databases for studies published between January 2013 and September 2019. Eligible studies were Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) and non-randomised controlled studies of integrated nutrition and stimulation interventions with child growth and developmental outcomes. We extracted data on intervention characteristics including delivery strategies, behaviour change techniques, intervention intensity and delivery personnel. We meta-analysed data for Length-for-age/Height-for-age Z scores (LAZ/HAZ) and cognitive, motor and language development scores, and conducted subgroup analyses by main intervention characteristics. Results Twenty-two unique RCTs met the inclusion criteria, of which 16 were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to the usual care, pooled Effect Sizes (ES) showed small to medium benefits of integrated interventions on cognitive (n = 15, ES 0.64; 95% CI: 0.39, 0.88) and language development scores (n = 10, ES 0.47, 95% CI: 0.21, 0.73) but heterogeneity was high (I2>75%). We found no significant effects of interventions on motor development scores (n = 12, ES 0.31, 95% CI: -0.02, 0.64) or LAZ/HAZ scores (n = 8, ES -0.03, 95% CI: -0.11, 0.03). The effects of interventions on developmental outcomes did not differ by intervention characteristics, and heterogeneity remained high in sub-group analyses. Conclusions Integrated nutrition and stimulation interventions had significant effects on cognitive and language development, but no detectable effect on motor development or linear growth. Our ability to identify intervention characteristics linked to positive effects can be improved by standardising the reporting of implementation processes. Key messages More high-quality trials with longer follow-up duration are needed to examine the role of integrated nutrition and stimulation interventions on growth and developmental outcomes. Future research should map the characteristics of integrated nutrition and stimulation interventions following standardised guidelines to understand their influence on the outcomes reported.

Download Full-text