What am I doing? It depends: agency and action identification

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cory A. Potts ◽  
Richard A. Carlson
Keyword(s):  
Action Identification

Abstract Construal Level and its Link to Self-Control and to Cross-Situational Consistency in Self-Concept: Predicting Health-Risk Behavioral Intentions

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Itziar Fernández ◽  
Amparo Caballero ◽  
Dolores Muñoz ◽  
Pilar Aguilar ◽  
Pilar Carrera
Keyword(s):  
Health Risk ◽  
Behavioral Intentions ◽  
Construal Level Theory ◽  
Self Control ◽  
Self Concept ◽  
Construal Level ◽  
Action Identification ◽  
Levels Of Abstraction ◽  
Sugar Intake ◽  
Identification Theory

AbstractFrom a dispositional perspective, we extend the action identification theory (Vallacher & Wegner, 1987) and construal level theory (Trope & Liberman, 2003) to cross-situational consistency of self and self-control. Two studies examined the relationships among the abstract mindset (Vallacher & Wegner, 1989), cross-situational consistency in self-concept (Vignoles et al., 2016), and self-control (Tangney, Baumeister, and Boone 2004). In Study 1, participants (N = 725) characterized by high cross-situational consistency showed more abstraction in their thinking (p < .001, ηp2 = .17). In Study 2 (N = 244) cross-situational consistency and self-control explained 10% of construal level, with self-control being a significant predictor (p < .001). Construal level and cross-situational consistency explained 17% of self-control; both were significant predictors (p < .001). Self-control explained 8% of cross-situational consistency (p < .001). Study 2 showed that participants with higher levels of abstraction, cross-situational consistency, and self-control reported a greater intention to control their future sugar intake (p < .001). Data supported relationships among abstract construal level, cross-situational consistency and self-control.

scholarly journals To the question of transformation of literary texts into stage version (“Three Years” of A. P. Chekhov in theatrical interpretation of S. V. Zhenovach)

Litera ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 33-41
Author(s):  
Daria Savinova
Keyword(s):  
Literary Text ◽  
Literary Texts ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Action Identification ◽  
Unpublished Manuscript ◽  
Complex Process ◽  
Authorial Intent ◽  
Stage Direction ◽  
New Type ◽  
Theatre Studies

This article is dedicated to the question of text transformation from authorial intent to stage impersonation. Despite the established tradition of studying the questions of recoding of literary text into theatrical, there is yet no theoretical-literary substantiation. Recoding is considered a complex process of creating a new type of text by the theatre director for staging a play. Therefore, an attempt is made to analyze the elements of transformation of literary text into its stage version, using the example of S. V. Zhenovach&rsquo;s unpublished manuscript for stage direction based on A. P. Chekhov&rsquo;s novella &ldquo;Three Years&rdquo;. The novelty of this research consists in determination of the patterns in transformation of literary text into stage version. The tools and means of expression applied in theatre and literature are different. If in literature it is possible to set several task and solve them all within the framework of the novel, then in theatre, it must be one ultimate task that organizes the action. Identification of the key peculiarities of existence of such type of text as &ldquo;stage direction&rdquo; on the example of transformation of the novella &ldquo;The Years&rdquo; from the authorial intent to stage impersonation demonstrated its significance for not only theatre studies, but also the theory of literature.

Do I Know What I’m Doing? Cognitive Dissonance and Action Identification Theory

2015 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valérie Fointiat ◽  
Audrey Pelt
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Dissonance ◽  
Attitude Change ◽  
Action Theory ◽  
Action Identification ◽  
Problematic Behavior ◽  
Target Behavior ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Identification Theory ◽  
High Level ◽  
Dissonance Reduction

AbstractOur main purpose was to explore hypotheses derived from the Identification of Action Theory in a particular situation that is, a dissonant situation. Thus, we varied the identification (low versus high-level) of a problematic behavior (to stop speaking for 24 hours) in the forced compliance paradigm. Two modes of dissonance reduction were presented: cognitive rationalization (classical attitude-change) and behavioral rationalization (target behavior: to stop speaking for 48 hours). As predicted, the results showed that high-level identity of action leads to cognitive rationalization whereas low-level identity leads to behavioural rationalization. Thus, participants identifying the problematic behavior at a low-level were more inclined to accept the target behavior, compared with participants identifying their problematic behavior at a higher-level. These results are of particular interest for understanding the extent to which the understanding of the discrepant act interferes with the cognitive processes of dissonance reduction.

That's easy for you to say: Action identification and speech fluency.

1989 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin R. Vallacher ◽  
Daniel M. Wegner ◽  
Maria P. Somoza
Keyword(s):  
Action Identification ◽  
Speech Fluency

scholarly journals Checking Heterogeneity and its Relationships with Action Identification Level

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 214-240
Author(s):  
S. Belayachi ◽  
M. Van Der Linden
Keyword(s):  
Cluster Analysis ◽  
Action Identification ◽  
Dysfunctional Beliefs ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Action Processing ◽  
Behavioral Dysregulation ◽  
Identification Theory ◽  
High Level

Consistent with the action identification theory proposal that some people identify their actions at a low-level (action processing regarding motor parameters) while others generally identify actions at a high-level (regarding goal features), and that a low-level of action identification leads to behavioral dysregulation (repetition, doubts about completion), checking proneness was found to be related to low-level action identification. Nevertheless, checking can be motivated by several factors (dysfunctional beliefs, incompleteness feelings). In the present research, we reexamine the level at which actions are identified by distinct subtypes of checking-prone participants. In Study 1, cluster analysis leads to the identification of four checking subtypes based on two dysfunctional beliefs domains (responsibility and perfectionism); our main results suggest that a low-level of action identification may characterize a checking subtype that is not motivated by responsibility related dysfunctional beliefs. Study 2 further reveals that anxiety features may characterize the checking subtype related to a low-level action identification.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document