The mnemonic effects of insight on false memory in the DRM paradigm

Author(s):  
Xiumin Du ◽  
Can Cui ◽  
Zhaohui Hu ◽  
Ke Zhang ◽  
Yaowu Song
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
pp. 174702182110564
Author(s):  
Jacob Namias ◽  
Mark Huff ◽  
Allison Smith ◽  
Nicholas Maxwell

We examined the effects of drawing on correct and false recognition within the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) false memory paradigm. In Experiment 1, we compared drawing of a word’s referent using either a standard black pencil or colored pencils relative to a read-only control group. Relative to reading, drawing in either black or colored pencil similarly boosted correct recognition and reduced false recognition. Signal-detection analyses indicated that drawing reduced the amount of encoded memory information for critical lures and increased monitoring, indicating that both processes contributed to the false recognition reduction. Experiment 2 compared drawing of individual images of DRM list items relative to drawing integrated images using sets of DRM list items. False recognition was lower for drawing of individual images relative to integrated images—a pattern that reflected a decrease in encoded memory information but not monitoring. Therefore, drawing individual images improves memory accuracy in the DRM paradigm relative to a standard read-control task and an integrated drawing task, which we argue is due to the recruitment of item-specific processing.


2019 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-210
Author(s):  
Melissa E Meade ◽  
Michael D Klein ◽  
Myra A Fernandes

Drawing, as an encoding strategy for to-be-remembered words, has previously been shown to provide robust memory benefits. In the current study, we investigated the effect of drawing on false memory endorsements during a recognition test. We found that while drawing led to higher hit rates relative to writing (Experiment 1) and creating visual mental imagery (Experiment 2), it also led to higher false alarm (FA) rates to critical lures in a variant of the Deese–Roediger–McDermott (DRM) paradigm. When compared with an encoding strategy requiring listing of object features (Experiment 3), drawing led to a lower FA rate. We suggest that drawing enhances memory by promoting recollection of rich visual contextual information during retrieval, and this leads to the unintended side effect of increasing FA rates to related information.


2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (12) ◽  
pp. 1596-1606
Author(s):  
Wei-Wei ZHANG ◽  
Fei GAO ◽  
Jun JIANG ◽  
Ji-Yuan ZHANG ◽  
Qing-Lin ZHANG

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-75
Author(s):  
Kouloud Abichou ◽  
Valentina La Corte ◽  
Serge Nicolas ◽  
Pascale Piolino

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Soledad Beato ◽  
Jason Arndt

We report an experiment examining the factors that produce false recognition in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm. We selectively manipulated the probability that critical lures produce study items in free association, known as forward associative strength (FAS), while controlling the probability that study items produce critical lures in free association, known as backward associative strength (BAS). Results showed that false recognition of critical lures failed to differ between strong and weak FAS conditions. Follow-up correlational analyses further supported this outcome, showing that FAS was not correlated with false recognition, despite substantial variability in both variables across our stimulus sets. However, these correlational analyses did produce a significant and strong relationship between BAS and false recognition. These results support views that propose false memory is produced by activation spreading from study items to critical lures during encoding, which leads critical lures to be confused with episodically-experienced events.


2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 196-206
Author(s):  
Hwajin Yang ◽  
Sujin Yang ◽  
Stephen J. Ceci ◽  
Alice M. Isen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document