Novel technique for a single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) approach to cholecystectomy: single-institution case series

2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 1666-1671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent P. Duron ◽  
Guy R. Nicastri ◽  
Peter S. Gill
2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. S181-S182
Author(s):  
AHF Brandão ◽  
MB Noviello ◽  
G Peret ◽  
B Lima ◽  
AS Santos-Filho

2011 ◽  
Vol 93 (6) ◽  
pp. 437-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Greaves ◽  
J Nicholson

Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is a rapidly developing field that may represent the future of laparoscopic surgery. The major advantage of SILS over standard laparoscopic surgery is in cosmesis, with surgery becoming essentially scarless if the incision is hidden within the umbilicus. Only one incision is required so the risk of potential complications like port site hernias, haematomas and wound infection is reduced. The trade-off for this is a technically more challenging procedure with different underlying principles to that of traditional laparoscopic surgery. A wide variety of new equipment has been developed to support SILS and the range of procedures that are amenable to the technique is increasing. To date most of the published data relating to SILS are in the form of case series, with the first large randomised controlled trials due to be completed by the end of 2012. The existing evidence suggests that SILS is similar to standard laparoscopic surgery in terms of complication rates, completion rates and post-operative pain scores. However, the duration of SILS is longer than equivalent laparoscopic procedures. This article discusses SILS with regard to its applications in general surgery and reviews the evidence currently available.


2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 3224-3224 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Joseph ◽  
N. A. Salas ◽  
C. Johnson ◽  
A. Goh ◽  
S. P. Cuevas ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 94 (10) ◽  
pp. 348-350
Author(s):  
KS Johal ◽  
P Tsim ◽  
A Redfern ◽  
C Weeks ◽  
HM Park ◽  
...  

Single-Incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is a relatively novel technique that employs a single incision to gain access to the peritoneal cavity. Potential advantages over conventional laparoscopy include reduction of port site complications, reduced pain and improved cosmesis. Given that the incidence of surgical site complications in conventional laparoscopic surgery (infection 0.5%, incisional hernia 7.9%, haematoma 6.25%) are all correlated directly with the incisional site, a reduction in the number of incisions has been suggested as a means of improving post-operative morbidity from laparoscopic surgery.


2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 1331-1335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohan A. Joseph ◽  
Alvin C. Goh ◽  
Sebastian P. Cuevas ◽  
Michael A. Donovan ◽  
Matthew G. Kauffman ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 144
Author(s):  
Luca Lacitignola ◽  
Marta Guadalupi ◽  
Federico Massari

In veterinary surgery, single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) techniques have been described since 2009, and, in recent decades, many authors have reported the application of SILS in small animals, thus, promoting the wide dissemination of this novel approach among veterinary laparoscopists. The aim of this literature review is to provide a critical evaluation of the scientific reports on SILS in the field of small animal laparoscopic surgery. A comprehensive literature review was performed including from 1 January 2009 to 1 July 2020. The following data were recorded from each study: the design, year of publication, surgical procedure, species, number of animals included, and surgical time. The type of SILS technique and type of control group technique were evaluated. In total, 90 articles were identified through database searches and manual searches. The qualitative analysis showed that most of the articles were retrospective studies, without a control group or case series. A meta-analysis was performed on the eight controlled studies, showing that SILS ovariectomy and gastrointestinal procedures had a comparable surgical time to multiport techniques. The study of the articles available in the veterinary literature did not allow for an adequate meta-analysis of the published results, especially regarding post-operative pain, evaluations of surgical times, and post-operative complications in comparison to multiport techniques. Therefore, veterinary surgeons who want to employ these techniques must consider the real advantages of SILS techniques.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshio Shiraishi ◽  
Tetsuro Tominaga ◽  
Takashi Nonaka ◽  
Kiyoaki Hamada ◽  
Masato Araki ◽  
...  

AbstractSingle-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has the potential to improve perioperative outcomes, including less postoperative pain, shorter operation time, less blood loss, and shorter hospital stay. However, SILS is technically difficult and needs a longer learning curve. Between April 2016 and September 2019, a total of 198 patients with clinical stage I/II right colon cancer underwent curative resection. In the case of the SILS approach, an organ retractor was usually used to overcome SILS-specific restrictions. The patients were divided into two groups by surgical approach: the SILS with organ retractor group (SILS-O, n = 33) and the conventional laparoscopic surgery group (LAC, n = 165). Clinical T status was significantly higher in the LAC group (p = 0.016). Operation time was shorter and blood loss was lower in the SILS-O group compared to the LAC group (117 vs. 197 min, p = 0.027; 10 vs. 25 mL, p = 0.024, respectively). In the SILS-O group, surgical outcomes including operation time, blood loss, number of retrieved lymph nodes, and postoperative complications were not significantly different between those performed by experts and by non-experts. Longer operation time (p = 0.041) was significantly associated with complications on univariate and multivariate analyses (odds ratio 2.514, 95%CI 1.047–6.035, p = 0.039). SILS-O was safe and feasible for right colon cancer. There is a potential to shorten the learning curve of SILS using an organ retractor.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document