Implementation of mini gastric bypass in the Netherlands: early and midterm results from a high-volume unit

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. 3949-3955 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Apers ◽  
R. Wijkmans ◽  
E. Totte ◽  
M. Emous
2020 ◽  
Vol 92 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Piotr Kowalewski ◽  
Michał Janik ◽  
Andrzej Kwiatkowski ◽  
Krzysztof Paśnik ◽  
Maciej Walędziak

Introduction: Bariatric procedures are becoming more popular worldwide. We present current situation of foreign patients treated by high-volume bariatric surgeons in Poland in 2016. Material and Methods: We sent an online survey to twenty high-volume bariatric surgeons. The questionnaire regarded 2016. We asked for number and types of bariatric procedures performed or supervised, number of foreign bariatric patients, their qualification process, country of origin, types of procedure, and post-op recommendations. Results: We received 9 surveys (45%). Five surgeons performed or supervised from 100 to 300 bariatric procedures, 2 performed or supervised over 300 procedures, 2 performed or supervised from 50 to 100 procedures. All of the respondents performed laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic gastric bypass (LRYGB), four carried out mini gastric bypass, two – gastric banding (LAGB), one – SADI-S and duodenal switch (DS). Six surgeons operated on the total of 64 foreign patients, mainly performing LSG, LRYGB and mini gastric bypass. Most of the patients were qualified based on international criteria (BMI over 40 kg/m2 or BMI over 35 kg/m2 with comorbidities). United Kingdom was the most popular country of origin, followed by Germany, USA, Ireland and Sweden. Qualification for surgery was based on personal visit. After surgery 83.3% (n=5) of the respondents gave out discharge documents in English, recommending long term bariatric follow-up in the country of origin. Every respondent maintained 3-month personal follow-up of every foreign patient. Conclusions: Foreign bariatric patients travelling to Poland are qualified for surgery according to known international standards. Most of the patients receive post-op discharge documents in English, with a 3-month follow-up performed by their surgeon. Further bariatric supervision in the country of origin is routinely recommended.


AJIL Unbound ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 115 ◽  
pp. 11-16
Author(s):  
Giesela Rühl

The past sixteen years have witnessed the proliferation of international commercial courts around the world. However, up until recently, this was largely an Asian and a Middle Eastern phenomenon. Only during the past decade have Continental European countries, notably Germany, France and the Netherlands, joined the bandwagon and started to create new judicial bodies for international commercial cases. Driven by the desire to attract high-volume commercial litigation, these bodies try to offer international businesses a better dispute settlement framework. But what are their chances of success? Will more international litigants decide to settle their disputes in these countries? In this essay, I argue that, despite its recently displayed activism, Continental Europe lags behind on international commercial courts. In fact, although the various European initiatives are laudable, most cannot compete with the traditional market leaders, especially the London Commercial Court, or with new rivals in Asia and the Middle East. If Continental Europe wants a role in the international litigation market, it must embrace more radical change. And this change will most likely have to happen on the European––not the national––level.


2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun Jeong Park ◽  
Seong Sook Hong ◽  
Jiyoung Hwang ◽  
Kyung Yul Hur

2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. 1482-1486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger Noun ◽  
Eddy Riachi ◽  
Smart Zeidan ◽  
Bassam Abboud ◽  
Viviane Chalhoub ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document