scholarly journals Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: a case-matched cost-analysis between robot-assisted surgery and direct manual laparoscopy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregorio Di Franco ◽  
Andrea Peri ◽  
Valentina Lorenzoni ◽  
Matteo Palmeri ◽  
Niccolò Furbetta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Cost Analysis ◽  
Distal Pancreatectomy ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Fixed Costs ◽  
Spleen Preservation ◽  
Robotic Assisted Surgery ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Complications Rate

Abstract Background Few studies have reported a structured cost analysis of robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP), and none have compared the relative costs between the robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) and the direct manual laparoscopy (DML) in this setting. The aim of the present study is to address this issue by comparing surgical outcomes and costs of RDP and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies (LDP). Methods Eighty-eight RDP and 47 LDP performed between January 2008 and January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Three comparable groups of 35 patients each (Si-RDP-group, Xi-RDP group, LDP-group) were obtained matching 1:1 the RDP-groups with the LDP-group. Overall costs, including overall variable costs (OVC) and fixed costs were compared using generalized linear regression model adjusting for covariates. Results The conversion rate was significantly lower in the Si-RDP-group and Xi-RDP-group: 2.9% and 0%, respectively, versus 14.3% in the LDP-group (p = 0.045). Although not statistically significant, the mean operative time was lower in Xi-RDP-group: 226 min versus 262 min for Si-RDP-group and 247 min for LDP-group. The overall post-operative complications rate and the length of hospital stay (LOS) were not significantly different between the three groups. In LDP-group, the LOS of converted cases was significantly longer: 15.6 versus 9.8 days (p = 0.039). Overall costs of LDP-group were significantly lower than RDP-groups, (p < 0.001). At multivariate analysis OVC resulted no longer statistically significantly different between LDP-group and Xi-RDP-group (p = 0.099), and between LDP-group and the RDP-groups when the spleen preservation was indicated (p = 0.115 and p = 0.261 for Si-RDP-group and Xi-RDP-group, respectively). Conclusions RAS is more expensive than DML for DP because of higher acquisition and maintenance costs. The flattening of these differences considering only the variable costs, in a high-volume multidisciplinary center for RAS, suggests a possible optimization of the costs in this setting. RAS might be particularly indicated for minimally invasive DP when the spleen preservation is scheduled.

OBESITY AND SELF-REPORTED OUTCOME AFTER MINIMALLY INVASIVE LUMBAR SPINAL FUSION SURGERY

Neurosurgery ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. 956-960 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Rosen ◽  
Sherise D. Ferguson ◽  
Alfred T. Ogden ◽  
Dezheng Huo ◽  
Richard G. Fessler
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Linear Models ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Fusion Surgery ◽  
Body Habitus ◽  
Short Form 36 ◽  
Spinal Fusion Surgery ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Lumbar Spinal

Abstract OBJECTIVE Many patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion are overweight or obese. The relationship between body habitus and outcome after lumbar spine fusion surgery is not well defined. METHODS We analyzed a prospectively maintained database of self-reported pain and quality of life measures, including Visual Analog Scale pain score, Short Form 36, and Oswestry Disability Index. We selected patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion between September 2002 and June 2006 at a single institution. We used linear regression models and mixed-effects linear models to examine the relationships between body habitus and self-reported outcomes. RESULTS The analysis identified 110 patients meeting the study criteria, with a median follow-up period of 14.8 months. The mean age was 56 years, mean height was 169 cm, and mean weight was 82.2 kg. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 28.7 kg/m2; 31% of patients were overweight (BMI, 25–29.9), and 32% of patients were obese (BMI, &gt;30). Linear regression analysis did not identify a correlation between weight or BMI and pre- and postsurgery changes in any of the outcome measures. The significant findings observed in the mixed-effects linear models were that the changing patterns of Short Form 36 Body Pain subscale and Short Form 36 Vitality subscale varied significantly by category of BMI (P = 0.01 and P = 0.002, respectively), but not significantly if continuous BMI was used (P = 0.53 and P = 0.46, respectively). BMI correlated marginally with estimated blood loss (P = 0.08), but not operative time, length of hospital stay, or complications. CONCLUSION Among this cohort of minimally invasive lumbar fusion patients, body habitus measured by BMI, weight, or height did not have a significant relationship with most self-reported outcome measures, operative time, length of hospital stay, or complications. Obesity should not be considered a contraindication to minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion surgery.

Management of intended durotomy in minimally invasive intradural spine surgery

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 279-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee A. Tan ◽  
Ippei Takagi ◽  
David Straus ◽  
John E. O'Toole
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Bed Rest ◽  
Tubular Retractor ◽  
Specific Patient ◽  
Dural Closure ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Operative Notes

Object Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been increasingly used for the treatment of various intradural spinal pathologies in recent years. Although MIS techniques allow for successful treatment of intradural pathology, primary dural closure in MIS can be technically challenging due to a limited surgical corridor through the tubular retractor system. The authors describe their experience with 23 consecutive patients from a single institution who underwent MIS for intradural pathologies, along with a review of pertinent literature. Methods A retrospective review of a prospectively collected surgical database was performed to identify patients who underwent MIS for intradural spinal pathologies between November 2006 and July 2013. Patient demographics, preoperative records, operative notes, and postoperative records were reviewed. Primary outcomes include operative duration, estimated blood loss, length of bed rest, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications, which were recorded prospectively. Results Twenty-three patients who had undergone MIS for intradural spinal pathologies during the study period were identified. Fifteen patients (65.2%) were female and 8 (34.8%) were male. The mean age at surgery was 54.4 years (range 30–74 years). Surgical pathologies included neoplastic (17 patients), congenital (3 patients), vascular (2 patients), and degenerative (1 patient). The most common spinal region treated was lumbar (11 patients), followed by thoracic (9 patients), cervical (2 patients), and sacral (1 patient). The mean operative time was 161.1 minutes, and the mean estimated blood loss was 107.2 ml. All patients were allowed full activity less than 24 hours after surgery. The median length of stay was 78.2 hours. Primary sutured dural closure was achieved using specialized MIS instruments with adjuvant fibrin sealant in all cases. The rate of postoperative headache, nausea, vomiting, and diplopia was 0%. No case of cutaneous CSF fistula or symptomatic pseudomeningocele was identified at follow-up, and no patient required revision surgery. Conclusions Primary dural closure with early mobilization is an effective strategy with excellent clinical outcomes in the use of MIS techniques for intradural spinal pathology. Prolonged bed rest after successful primary dural closure appears unnecessary, and the need for watertight dural closure should not prevent the use of MIS techniques in this specific patient population.

Postoperative risk of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy with or without spleen preservation

2020 ◽  
pp. 030089162093674
Author(s):  
Michele Mazzola ◽  
Jacopo Crippa ◽  
Camillo L. Bertoglio ◽  
Sara Andreani ◽  
Lorenzo Morini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Fistula ◽  
Distal Pancreatectomy ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Spleen Preservation ◽  
Spleen Preserving ◽  
Postoperative Risk ◽  
Duration Of Surgery

Introduction: Outcomes after distal pancreatectomy with or without splenectomy are controversial. The present study aims to investigate differences in short-term and long-term outcomes between spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP) and distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (DPS). Methods: In this retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy with or without splenectomy from January 2011 until December 2017 for benign disease, the primary endpoint was to compare postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). The secondary endpoint was to compare duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and long-term outcomes. Results: Patients undergoing SPDP had a lower rate of POPF (13.6% vs 46.1%; p = 0.02). Patients undergoing SPDP (n = 22) were discharged earlier than patients undergoing DPS (n = 26) (8 [4–29] vs 12 [6.48] days; p = 0.003). No differences in other intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were found between groups. Conclusion: Patients undergoing SPDP developed fewer POPF and were discharged earlier compared to patients undergoing DPS.

PS02.012: AN IMPORTANT COMPLICATION OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMIES: HIATAL HERNIA

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 123-123
Author(s):  
Atila Eroglu ◽  
Yener Aydin ◽  
Ali Ulas ◽  
Coskun Daharli
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Hiatal Hernia ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Esophageal Resection ◽  
Ivor Lewis ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background Development of hiatal hernia after esophageal resection is a known complication. However, due to the spread of minimally invasive esophagectomy, complications of hiatal hernia seems to increase. This study aimed to present our cases with hiatal hernia after Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy. Methods After Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy, five cases of hiatal hernia were observed. Patients' age, sex, symptoms, diagnosis, herniated organs, surgical method, morbidity and mortality rates and hospital stay were reviewed. Results Three of the patients were male and two were female. The mean age of the patients was 56.2 years (35–71 years). Hiatal hernia was detected after an average of 1.4 years with minimal invasive esophagectomies (5 months, 1 year, 1 year, 18 months and 3 years respectively). Three of the cases were symptomatic and two cases were asymptomatic. Thorax CT was used in all cases, and two cases were additionally imaged with barium esophagography. Herniated organs were: omentum in 5 cases, transverse colon in 4 cases, small bowel in two cases. All cases were laparoscopically approached. Diaphragmatic defects were repaired using nonabsorbable sutures in all cases. No complication and mortality was observed in patients. The mean length of hospital stay was 4.9 days (range, 3 to 10 days). Conclusion Hiatal hernia is more frequently seen in minimally invasive esophagectomies than open esophagectomies. Patients undergoing minimal esophagectomy should be closely monitored for hiatal hernia postoperatively. These cases can also be treated by minimally invasive laparoscopy. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

scholarly journals Learning Curve of Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy: A European Cohort Study among High-volume Centers

HPB ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. S713
Author(s):  
S. Lof ◽  
L. Claassen ◽  
G. Hannink ◽  
U. Boggi ◽  
G. Butturini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Distal Pancreatectomy ◽  
High Volume

scholarly journals Sequential Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty Through a Minimally Invasive Anterior Approach is Safe to Perform

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 1417-1422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerasimos Petridis ◽  
Martin Nolde
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
The Mean

Background: Sequential bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) has the potential advantages of a single operative intervention with a single hospital stay, alongside reduced costs and total rehabilitation times. Its use has been limited, however, by a theoretical increase in perioperative complications. Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess functional outcomes and complications in patients undergoing sequential bilateral THA performed using anterior minimally invasive surgery (AMIS). We hypothesized that sequential bilateral THA yields favorable clinical outcome and is safe to perform. Methods: Two surgical centres conducted a retrospective observational analysis of 130 patients (77 females) with a mean age of 57 (range, 35-77) years, all of whom were treated by one surgeon and followed up for 24 months. Results: The mean length of hospital stay length was 8.4 (range, 6–18) days. The mean operative time was 162 (range, 92–185) minutes, the mean intraoperative blood loss was 499.1ml, and the mean preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin levels were 14.3 g/dl and 11.3 g/dl, respectively. No perioperative complications or deaths were recorded. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) improved from 44.5 ±13.7 preoperatively to 98.9 ± 1.0 at final follow-up. Also the High Activity Arthroplasty Score (HAAS) and the Questions on Life Satisfaction (FLZ) score improved significantly. Conclusion: This retrospective analysis suggests that, in selected patients, sequential bilateral THA via an anterior minimally invasive approach appears to be a valid alternative to two-stage bilateral THA. Further studies are warranted.

Impact of Surgical Mentorship on Retroperitoneoscopic Adrenalectomy with Comparison to Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy

2013 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. 162-166
Author(s):  
James T. Broome ◽  
Carmen C. Solorzano
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Adrenal Tumors ◽  
Retroperitoneoscopic Adrenalectomy ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Impact

Retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (RA) provides a direct approach to the adrenal gland. RA represents a complex approach with unique orientation that is less intuitive. The authors objectively evaluated the impact of mentorship on the performance of RA and also compared it with laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA). After implementing the use of RA, a retrospective review of the operative experience of two high-volume endocrine surgeons was performed. Both surgeons participated in a hands-on RA mentorship. Clinical presentation and perioperative outcomes were compared. Subgroup analysis was used to compare RA pre- and postmentorship and with LA. Sixty-one LAs and 31 RAs were included in the analysis. The mean operative time was 115 for LA versus 90 minutes for RA ( P = 0.002). Blood loss was greater for LA versus RA (56 vs 22 mL; P = 0.001). Length of stay (LOS) for LA was 2.2 versus 1.5 days for RA ( P = 0.029). Ten patients were treated by RA in the prementorship era versus 21 in the postmentorship era. The mean operative time for the prementorship group was 118 minutes, which decreased to 77 minutes postmentorship ( P < 0.0001). LOS also decreased from 2.0 to 1.2 days ( P = 0.04) in the postmentorship era. RA demonstrates a shorter operative time, less blood loss, and decrease length of hospital stay as compared with standard LA. After proper mentorship and patient selection, RA may represent a superior option for removal of small, benign adrenal tumors.

Robotic-Assisted versus Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy: The Results of a Case-Matched Analysis from a Tertiary Care Center

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 229-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Vito Marino ◽  
Antonello Mirabella ◽  
Marcos Gomez Ruiz ◽  
Andrzej Lech Komorowski
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Distal Pancreatectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy ◽  
Oncologic Outcomes ◽  
Robotic Group ◽  
Spleen Preservation ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Preservation Rate

Background: Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) has been adopted relatively slowly despite the benefits of minimally invasive approach. The robotic approach can overcome the limitations of LDP, thus increasing the acceptance of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy. Methods: We performed a 1:1 retrospective case-matched comparison among 2 groups of 35 patients who underwent robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomy (RDP) or LDP from August 2014 to April 2017. Results: The operative time was similar in both groups (230 RDP vs. 205 LDP min, p = 0.382). The robotic group had a lower estimated blood loss (95 vs. 275 mL, p = 0.035). The spleen preservation rate was higher in the RDP group (100 vs. 66.7%, p = 0.027), while the conversion rate to open surgery was higher in the laparoscopic group (14.3 vs. 2.9%, p = 0.048). The overall complication rate was lower in the robotic group (25.7 vs. 37.1%, p = 0.044). There was no statistically significant difference in oncologic outcomes between the groups in terms of R0 resection rate (100% RDP vs. 85% LDP, p = 0.233) and number of harvested lymph nodes (14.4 RDP vs. 10.8 LDP, p = 0.678). Conclusions: The RDP showed a lower estimated blood loss, conversion, and morbidity rate. It offered a higher spleen preservation rate in comparison to LDP while maintaining comparable oncologic outcomes.

scholarly journals Defining high volume center for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy

HPB ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. S268-S269
Author(s):  
R. Panni ◽  
R. Fields ◽  
C. Hammill ◽  
M. Doyle ◽  
S. Strasberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Distal Pancreatectomy ◽  
High Volume ◽  
High Volume Center

Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Management of Penetrating Abdominal Trauma in Children

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Abdelhafez Mahmoud ◽  
Mohammad Alsayed Daboos ◽  
Ahmed Said Sayed Bayoumi ◽  
Ahmed Abdelghaffar Helal ◽  
Abdulrahman Almaawi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Penetrating Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Missed Injury ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Laparoscopic Assisted

Abstract Introduction Traditionally, exploratory laparotomy was used to treat penetrating abdominal trauma (PAT). At present, minimally invasive surgery (for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes) has developed and represents a rapidly evolving modality for dealing with PAT in stable children. In this article, we aim to present our experience, evaluate the effectiveness, and report the results of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for PAT in stable pediatric patients. Materials and Methods This prospective study involved 117 hemodynamically stable pediatric cases of PAT (caused by gunshots, stab, and accidental stab), admitted, and managed according to the severity of injury. The information recorded for analysis included demographic data, the anatomical location of injury, the initial vital data and scoring systems, the organs affected, the procedures done, operative time, need for conversion to laparoscopic-assisted approach, length of hospital stay, complications, missed injury, and mortality rate. Results Among 117 pediatric patients with PAT, 15 cases were treated conservatively and 102 cases were managed by MIS. They were 70 males and 47 females with a mean age of 7.3 ± 0.6 years (range = 1–14 years). They included 48 cases of gunshot injury, 33 cases of abdominal stab, and 36 cases of accidental stab. Laparoscopy was diagnostic (DL) in 33.3% (n = 34) and therapeutic (TL) in 66.7% (n = 68) of cases. Of the 68 TL cases, we completely managed 59 cases (86.8%) by laparoscopy, while 9 cases (13.2%) were converted to limited laparotomy. The mean operative time was 17 ± 1 minutes (range = 12–25 minutes) for DL, 85 ± 9 minutes (range = 41–143 minutes) for complete TL cases, and 89 ± 3 minutes (range = 47–149 minutes) for laparoscopic-assisted procedures. For DL cases, the mean length of hospital stay was 2 ± 0.4 days, while for complete TL cases, it was 5.4 ± 0.83 days, and for laparoscopic-assisted cases, it was 5.8 ± 0.37 days. Postoperative complications occurred in eight cases (7.84%), with five cases (4.9%) required reintervention. No missed injury or mortality was recorded in the study. The patients were followed up for a median period of 52 months. Conclusion For management of PAT in children, MIS has 100% accuracy in defining the injured organs with zero percent missed injuries.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document