Acute palliative care unit–initiated interventions for advanced cancer patients at the end of life: prediction of impending death based on Glasgow Prognostic Score

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshihide Nagasako ◽  
Masahiro Suzuki ◽  
Tetsuji Iriyama ◽  
Yoko Nagasawa ◽  
Yoshiki Katayama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Life Prediction ◽  
Prognostic Score ◽  
Glasgow Prognostic Score ◽  
Palliative Care Unit ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Impending Death

scholarly journals Validation of the Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score in Advanced Cancer Patients Receiving Palliative Care

2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 270-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naitielle de Paula Pantano ◽  
Bianca Sakamoto Ribeiro Paiva ◽  
David Hui ◽  
Carlos Eduardo Paiva
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Score ◽  
Glasgow Prognostic Score ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score

scholarly journals Shifting Palliative Care Paradigm in Primary Care From Better Death to Better End-of-Life : A Swiss Pilot Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Sommer ◽  
Christopher Chung ◽  
Dagmar M. Haller ◽  
Sophie Pautex
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Communication Skills ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients

Abstract Background: Patients suffering from advanced cancer often loose contact with their primary care physician (PCP) during oncologic treatment and palliative care is introduced very late.The aim of this pilot study was to test the feasibility and procedures for a randomized trial of an intervention to teach PCPs a palliative care approach and communication skills to improve advanced cancer patients’ quality of life. Methods: Observational pilot study in 5 steps. 1) Recruitment of PCPs. 2) Intervention: training on palliative care competencies and communication skills addressing end-of-life issues.3) Recruitment of advanced cancer patients by PCPs. 4) Patients follow-up by PCPs, and assessment of their quality of life by a research assistant 5) Feedback from PCPs using a semi-structured focus group and three individual interviews with qualitative deductive theme analysis.Results: 8 PCPs were trained. PCPs failed to recruit patients for fear of imposing additional loads on their patients. PCPs changed their approach of advanced cancer patients. They became more conscious of their role and responsibility during oncologic treatments and felt empowered to take a more active role picking up patient’s cues and addressing advance directives. They developed interprofessional collaborations for advance care planning. Overall, they discovered the role to help patients to make decisions for a better end-of-life.Conclusions: PCPs failed to recruit advanced cancer patients, but reported a change in paradigm about palliative care. They moved from a focus on helping patients to die better, to a new role helping patients to define the conditions for a better end-of-life.Trial registration : The ethics committee of the canton of Geneva approved the study (2018-00077 Pilot Study) in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki

An early palliative care intervention can be confronting but reassuring: A qualitative study on the experiences of patients with advanced cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 783-792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica Fliedner ◽  
Sofia Zambrano ◽  
Jos MGA Schols ◽  
Marie Bakitas ◽  
Christa Lohrmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
End Of Life Decisions ◽  
Early Palliative Care ◽  
Network Support ◽  
Care Intervention ◽  
Life Decisions

Background: Intervention trials confirm that patients with advanced cancer receiving early palliative care experience a better quality of life and show improved knowledge about and use of palliative care services. To involve patients in future health-care decisions, health professionals should understand patients’ perspectives. However, little is known about how patients’ experience such interventions. Aim: To explore advanced cancer patients’ experiences with a structured early palliative care intervention, its acceptability and impact on the patients’ life including influencing factors. Design: Qualitative content analysis of in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Setting/participants: Patients with various advanced cancer diagnoses were enrolled in a multicenter randomized controlled trial (NCT01983956), which investigated the impact of “Symptoms, End-of-life decisions, Network, Support,” a structured early palliative care intervention, on distress. Of these, 20 patients who underwent the intervention participated in this study. Results: Participants received the intervention well and gained a better understanding of their personal situation. Patients reported that the intervention can feel “confronting” but with the right timing it can be confirming and facilitate family conversations. Patients’ personal background and the intervention timing within their personal disease trajectory influenced their emotional and cognitive experiences; it also impacted their understanding of palliative care and triggered actions toward future care planning. Conclusion: Early palliative care interventions like “Symptoms, End-of-life decisions, Network, Support” may provoke emotions and feel “confrontational” often because this is the first time when issues about one’s end of life are openly discussed; yet, advanced cancer patients found it beneficial and felt it should be incorporated into routine care.

Coping with uncertainty: A qualitative study of 33 palliative care consultations among patients with advanced cancer.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 92-92
Author(s):  
Mohamedtaki Abdulaziz Tejani ◽  
Charles Stewart Kamen ◽  
Supriya Gupta Mohile ◽  
Robert E. Gramling
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
The Future ◽  
Research Working Group

92 Background: Despite scientific advances, uncertainty remains an inherent and significant issue in clinical practice. Among patients with advanced cancer, uncertainty about the future can lead to distress, loss of sense of control and lower quality of life. Helping patients manage uncertainty is a core domain of patient-centered care. Little is known about how palliative care providers work with cancer patients to accomplish this goal. Methods: We performed descriptive analysis of transcripts from audio recorded inpatient palliative care consultations among adult cancer patients referred for ‘goals of care’ or ‘end of life decision making.’ Each transcript was read as a whole and then again line by line to code verbal expressions of uncertainty. Excerpted segments dealing with uncertainty about the future were grouped and analyzed by an experienced qualitative research working group. Results: 33 consultations were analyzed: 53% men, median age 62 and median survival 3.6 weeks. Multiple expressions of uncertainty were identified – 106 by patients/families and 56 by providers. A majority (63%) were centered on the inevitable uncertainty in predicting clinical course at the end of life. Palliative care providers managed this type of uncertainty in three main ways: (a) pairing expressions of unpredictability with reiteration of what was certain/known at time of consultation (e.g. ‘we will not let you suffer’); (b) utilizing inherent uncertainty of future to promote hope and faith (e.g. ‘nobody knows how long you are going to live’) and (c) reassurance that multi-disciplinary providers would convene to provide consensus and clarity for next visit (e.g. ‘we will all put our heads together and come up with exactly which options are available.’). Conclusions: Uncertainty is highly prevalent during end of life consultations with advanced cancer patients. Palliative care providers use validating strategies to help patients acknowledge and cope with what is inherently uncertain about their future. These methods can be used to develop communication training and guidelines for use with advanced cancer patients at the end of life.

scholarly journals Providing dignity therapy to patients with advanced cancer: a feasibility study within the setting of a hospital palliative care unit

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Nunziante ◽  
Silvia Tanzi ◽  
Sara Alquati ◽  
Cristina Autelitano ◽  
Enrica Bedeschi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Palliative Care Unit ◽  
Evaluation Procedure ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Dignity Therapy ◽  
Feedback Questionnaire

Abstract Background Dignity is a basic principle of palliative care and is intrinsic in the daily practice of professionals assisting individuals with incurable diseases. Dignity Therapy (DT) is a short-term intervention aimed at improving the sense of purpose, meaning and self-worth and at reducing the existential distress of patients facing advanced illness. Few studies have examined how DT works in countries of non-Anglo Saxon culture and in different real-life settings. Moreover, most studies do not provide detailed information on how DT is conducted, limiting a reliable assessment of DT protocol application and of its evaluation procedure. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a nurse-led DT intervention in advanced cancer patients receiving palliative care. Method This is a mixed-method study using before and after evaluation and semistructured interviews. Cancer patients referred to a hospital palliative care unit were recruited and provided with DT. The duration of sessions, and timeframes concerning each step of the study, were recorded, and descriptive statistical analyses were performed. The patients' dignity-related distress and feedback toward the intervention were assessed through the Patient Dignity Inventory and the Dignity Therapy Patient Feedback Questionnaire, respectively. Three nurses were interviewed on their experience in delivering the intervention, and the data were analyzed qualitatively. Results A total of 37/50 patients were enrolled (74.0%), of whom 28 (75.7%) completed the assessment. In 76.7% of cases, patients completed the intervention in the time limit scheduled in the study. No statistically significant reduction in the Patient Dignity Inventory scores was observed at the end of the intervention; most patients found DT to be helpful and satisfactory. Building opportunities for personal growth and providing holistic care emerged among the facilitators to DT implementation. Nurses also highlighted too great of a time commitment and a difficult collaboration with ward colleagues among the barriers. Conclusions Our findings strongly support the acceptability, but only partially support the feasibility, of nurse-led DT in advanced cancer patients in a hospital setting. Further research is needed on how to transfer the potential benefits of DT into clinical practice. Trial registration Retrospectively registered on ClinicalTrial.gov NCT04738305.

Unscheduled hospitalization in advanced cancer patients: Time to rethink about the illness.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e23007-e23007
Author(s):  
Lorena Ostios-García ◽  
Jesus Miranda Poma ◽  
Darío Sánchez Cabrero ◽  
Laura Gutiérrez Sainz ◽  
Julia Villamayor Sánchez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Gynecological Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Score ◽  
Prognostic Scores ◽  
Birth Date ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients

e23007 Background: The aim of our study was to determine if an unscheduled hospitalization in advanced cancer patients is a good time for palliative care referrals, and if this indicator could be improved with some other prognostic score. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study, which included all patients with unscheduled hospitalization in the medical oncology service from January 2011 to December 2013. In order to improve the accuracy of the analysis we considered only first admissions of each patient. We excluded patients with scheduled and unindicated hospitalization. The main variable was survival after an unscheduled hospitalization. We collected the following variables: demographic (age, sex, date of birth, date of death and place of death), tumor type, clinical variables (reason for admission, date of hospitalization, assessment by the palliative care unit during hospitalization, date of last chemotherapy and ECOG), analytical variables (albumin, lymphocytes and lactate dehydrogenase) and a prognostic nomogram developed by our team. Results: Inclusion criteria were met by 1,180 patients. Table summarizes the main sociodemographic characteristics, the type of tumor, and the functional status of patients according to the ECOG scale. After two years of follow-up, 816 (69%) patients had died. The median overall survival was 188 days (161-214). Patients with breast and gynecological cancer had the longest survival, while patients with melanoma, gastric cancer, lung cancer, and pancreatic cancer had the poorest survival. 676 patients (58%) were readmitted during the following year. Readmissions meant a significant decrease of survival. The stage of the oncological disease and performance status measured by ECOG had a clear relationship with survival time. Prognostic nomogram showed high accuracy to predict the probability of survival. Median survival for different quartile was respectively: 348, 139, 68 and 31 days (p < 0´000). Conclusions: The median survival of patients after an unscheduled hospitalization was around 6 months. Been admitted seems a good indicator to introduce specific palliative care. The use of other prognostic scores, as a prognostic nomogram, could help to select patient’ groups with poorer survivals. [Table: see text]

Cost Savings Associated With Palliative Care Among Older Adults With Advanced Cancer

2021 ◽  
pp. 104990912098680
Author(s):  
Paige E. Sheridan ◽  
Wendi G. LeBrett ◽  
Daniel P. Triplett ◽  
Eric J. Roeland ◽  
Andrew R. Bruggeman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Healthcare Costs ◽  
Healthcare Expenditure ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Palliative Care Consultation ◽  
Care Consultation ◽  
The Impact

Background: There is inconsistent evidence that palliative care intervention decreases total healthcare expenditure at end-of-life for oncology patients. This inconsistent evidence may result from small sample sizes at single institution studies and disparate characterization of costs across studies. Comprehensive studies in population-based datasets are needed to fully understand the impact of palliative care on total healthcare costs. This study analyzed the impact of palliative care on total healthcare costs in a nationally representative sample of advanced cancer patients. Methods: We conducted a matched cohort study among Medicare patients with metastatic lung, colorectal, breast and prostate cancers. We matched patients who received a palliative care consultation to similar patients who did not receive a palliative care consultation on factors related to both the receipt of palliative care and end of life costs. We compared direct costs between matched patients to determine the per-patient economic impact of a palliative care consultation. Results: Patients who received a palliative care consultation experienced an average per patient cost of $5,834 compared to $7,784 for usual care patients (25% decrease; p < 0.0001). Palliative care consultation within 7 days of death decreased healthcare costs by $451, while palliative care consultation more than 4 weeks from death decreased costs by $4,643. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that palliative care has the capacity to substantially reduce healthcare expenditure among advanced cancer patients. Earlier palliative care consultation results in greater cost reductions than consultation in the last week of life.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document