scholarly journals Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted French version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) in patients with low back pain

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 130-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stéphane Genevay ◽  
Christine Cedraschi ◽  
Marc Marty ◽  
Sylvie Rozenberg ◽  
Pierre De Goumoëns ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Core Outcome ◽  
Low Back ◽  
French Version ◽  
The Core ◽  
Culturally Adapted ◽  
Core Outcome Measures

scholarly journals Cross-cultural adaption and validation of the Swedish version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for low-back pain

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 1445-1452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah Granström ◽  
Anna Langborg ◽  
Anne F. Mannion ◽  
Eva Rasmussen-Barr
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Core Outcome ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Swedish Version ◽  
The Core ◽  
Cultural Adaption ◽  
Core Outcome Measures

Abstract Purpose There is a wide selection of instruments and questionnaires available, but many are time consuming in their administration, for patients, practitioners and researchers alike. The Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) is a short, self-administrated, multidimensional instrument translated into several languages that covers five domains recommended in the assessment of outcome in patients with low-back pain. The purpose of this study was to cross-culturally adapt the COMI from English to Swedish and to test the face and construct validity and reproducibility of its results in patients with low-back pain. Methods Participants (n = 102) were included from primary and secondary care. The participants reported moderate pain and disability levels. All participants filled in the COMI, the Oswestry Disability Index and the EQ5D at baseline. Forty-nine filled in the COMI again after 7 days for the reproducibility part of the study. Results The instrument was successfully forward and back-translated. In the validation process, there were low floor/ceiling effects, with the exception of the symptom-specific well-being (floor) and work disability (ceiling) items. The specific COMI domains and whole score correlated significantly with the chosen reference scale scores to the hypothesised extent (Rho 0.30–0.60 and > 0.60 respectively). COMI reached ICC 0.63 (95% CI 0.42–0.77) in the reproducibility test and the separate items, ICC 0.41–0.78. Conclusions The Swedish COMI shows acceptable psychometric properties and is thus suitable to use as a short instrument for measuring important domains in patients with low-back pain. A future study should investigate the instrument's sensitivity to measure change after treatment. Graphic abstract These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

scholarly journals Validity of the French version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for low back pain patients: a prospective cohort study

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 2097-2104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stéphane Genevay ◽  
◽  
Marc Marty ◽  
Delphine S. Courvoisier ◽  
Violaine Foltz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Core Outcome ◽  
Low Back ◽  
French Version ◽  
The Core ◽  
Core Outcome Measures ◽  
Pain Patients

scholarly journals Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Polish version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for low back pain

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 995-1001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grzegorz Miekisiak ◽  
Marta Kollataj ◽  
Jan Dobrogowski ◽  
Wojciech Kloc ◽  
Witold Libionka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Cultural Adaptation ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Core Outcome ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Cross Cultural Adaptation ◽  
The Core ◽  
Polish Version ◽  
Core Outcome Measures

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Arabic version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for the back (COMI-back) in patients with non-specific low back pain

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 2413-2430
Author(s):  
AlShaymaa Abdeldaiem ◽  
Emad S. B. Saweeres ◽  
Abd-Elhafiz Abd-Elsalam Shehab-Eldien ◽  
Anne F. Mannion ◽  
Aliaa Rehan Youssef
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Cultural Adaptation ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Core Outcome ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Arabic Version ◽  
Cross Cultural Adaptation ◽  
The Core ◽  
Core Outcome Measures

scholarly journals Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Norwegian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for low back pain

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 2539-2549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kjersti Storheim ◽  
Jens Ivar Brox ◽  
Ida Løchting ◽  
Erik L. Werner ◽  
Margreth Grotle
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Cultural Adaptation ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Core Outcome ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Cross Cultural Adaptation ◽  
The Core ◽  
Norwegian Version ◽  
Core Outcome Measures

scholarly journals Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Slovenian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for Low back pain

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matevž Topolovec ◽  
David Vozlič ◽  
Nejc Plohl ◽  
Rok Vengust ◽  
Miha Vodičar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Cultural Adaptation ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Core Outcome ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Cross Cultural Adaptation ◽  
The Core ◽  
Core Outcome Measures ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Abstract Background: To conduct a cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) in the Slovenian language, for use in patients with low back pain. Methods: The English version of COMI was translated into Slovene following established guidelines. 353 patients with chronic low back pain were recruited from the Orthopedic clinic department of a tertiary care teaching institution. Data quality, construct validity, responsiveness, and test-retest reliability of the COMI were assessed. Results: The questionnaire was generally well accepted with no missing values. The majority of items exhibited only mild floor and ceiling effects. Correlations with Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were high (ρ = 0.76 between overall COMI and ODI scores), suggesting that the Slovene version of COMI had high construct validity. Additionally, the Slovene version of COMI successfully captured surgical patients’ improvement in their low back problem (indicator of responsiveness) and showed acceptable test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.86). Conclusions: The Slovene version of COMI showed good psychometric properties, comparable to those of previously tested language versions. It represents a valuable instrument for the use in future domestic and multicenter clinical studies.

Reliability and validity of the Persian adaptation of the Core Outcome Measure Index in patients with chronic low back pain

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 723-726 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari ◽  
Soofia Naghdi ◽  
Zahra Eskandari ◽  
Nasser Salsabili ◽  
Ramin Kordi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Core Outcome ◽  
Low Back ◽  
The Core ◽  
Core Outcome Measure Index ◽  
Core Outcome Measure ◽  
Measure Index

scholarly journals Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Slovenian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for Low back pain

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matevž Topolovec ◽  
David Vozlič ◽  
Nejc Plohl ◽  
Rok Vengust ◽  
Miha Vodičar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Cultural Adaptation ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Core Outcome ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Cross Cultural Adaptation ◽  
The Core ◽  
Core Outcome Measures ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Abstract Background: To conduct a cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) in the Slovenian language, for use in patients with low back pain.Methods: The English version of COMI was translated into Slovene following established guidelines. 353 patients with chronic low back pain were recruited from the Orthopedic clinic department of a tertiary care teaching institution. Data quality, construct validity, responsiveness, and test-retest reliability of the COMI were assessed. Results: The questionnaire was generally well accepted with no missing values. The majority of items exhibited only mild ceiling effects (below 20.0%) and somewhat more prominent floor effects, which were similar to previous studies (4.5%-78.8%). Correlations with Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were high (ρ = 0.76 between overall COMI and ODI scores), suggesting that the Slovene version of COMI had high construct validity. Additionally, the Slovene version of COMI successfully captured surgical patients’ improvement in their low back problem after surgery (overall COMI score change: Z = -9.34, p < .001, r = -0.53) and showed acceptable test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.86). Conclusions: The Slovene version of COMI showed good psychometric properties, comparable to those of previously tested language versions. It represents a valuable instrument for the use in future domestic and multicenter clinical studies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document