scholarly journals Correction to Clinical anatomy of the lumbar sinuvertebral nerve with regard to discogenic low back pain and review of literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 2409-2409
Author(s):  
S. Quinones ◽  
M. Konschake ◽  
L. L. Aguilar ◽  
C. Simon ◽  
P. Aragones ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
S. Quinones ◽  
M. Konschake ◽  
L. L. Aguilar ◽  
C. Simon ◽  
P. Aragones ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Lumbar discogenic diffuse pain is still not understood. Authors describe the sinuvertebral nerve (SVN) as one possible cause. Body-donor studies are rare and controversial. Therefore, the aim was to revisit the origin, course and distribution in a body-donor study. Methods Six lumbar blocks (3 female, 3 male) aged between 59 and 94 years were dissected. After removal of the back muscles, lamina, dura mater and cauda equina, the anterior vertebral venous plexus, spinal artery and SVN were exposed and evaluated. Results 43 nerves out of 48 levels could be evaluated. The origin of the SVN was constituted by two roots: a somatic and a sympathetic branch arising from the rami communicantes. In 4/48 intervertebral canals studied (8.3%), we found two SVN at the same level. In 35/48 cases, one SVN was found. In 9/48 cases, no SVN was found. The SVN had a recurrent course below the inferior vertebral notch; in the vertebral canal it showed different patterns: ascending branch (31/43, 72.1%), common branch diverging into two branches (10/43, 23.3%), double ascending branch (1/43, 2.3%) finalizing two levels above and a descending branch (1/43, 2.3%). In 12/43 cases (27.9%) the SVN had ipsilateral connections with another SVN. The distribution ended in the middle of the vertebral body supplying adjacent structures. Conclusion A thorough understanding of the anatomy of the SVN might lead to significant benefits in therapy of discogenic low back pain. We suggest blocking the SVN at the level of the inferior vertebral notch of two adjacent segments. Level of evidence I Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with consistently applied reference standard and blinding


Spine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Wu ◽  
Hai-xin Song ◽  
Yan Dong ◽  
Jian-hua Li

Spine ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 30 (19) ◽  
pp. 2230-2236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rudolf Bertagnoli ◽  
James J. Yue ◽  
Rahul V. Shah ◽  
Regina Nanieva ◽  
Frank Pfeiffer ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. 1231-1237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nianhu Li ◽  
Camden Whitaker ◽  
Zhanwang Xu ◽  
Michael Heggeness ◽  
Shang-You Yang

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corey W Hunter ◽  
Richard Guyer ◽  
Mark Froimson ◽  
Michael J DePalma

Aim: To explore the effects of viable allogeneic disc tissue supplementation in younger patients with discogenic chronic low back pain (CLBP). Patients & methods: VAST was a randomized placebo-controlled trial of disc allograft supplementation in 218 patients with discogenic CLBP. We conducted a post hoc analysis of change from baseline to 12 months in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale for pain intensity scores stratified by patient age. Results: Patients aged <42 years receiving allograft experienced greater improvement in ODI (p = 0.042) and a higher ODI response rate (≥10-, ≥15- and ≥20-point reductions in ODI) than those receiving saline (p = 0.001, p = 0.002 and p = 0.021, respectively). Conclusion: Young patients with discogenic CLBP may have significant functional improvement following nonsurgical disc allograft supplementation.


Spine ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (21) ◽  
pp. 2510-2515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A. Anderson ◽  
Paul E. Schwaegler ◽  
Deborah Cizek ◽  
Glen Leverson

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 370-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Edward ◽  
Leah Yacat Carreon ◽  
Mark V. Williams ◽  
Steven Glassman ◽  
Jing Li

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document